Replies

you made a statement about Czechs forming Churchs in 45 AD? your Question was “There were people and groups in N-W EUrope that did not know of the See of Rome” --> PROVE IT.

you can't toss out random statements without proof and then try to run away from the question or obfuscate it

You are telling me that you know absolutely that there was never a Christian who travelled from the eastern Mediterranean region to central Europe in the 1st century. -- that's not the statement you made, you said “There were people and groups in N-W EUrope that did not know of the See of Rome”. Don't change the statement now after your statement has been proven false.

You are making a statement that you have such superior knowledge that you can say that no man ever carried the Gospel north of, say, Greece or Macedonia in the first century.

Strawman alert -- that's not the statement you made, you said “There were people and groups in N-W EUrope that did not know of the See of Rome”. I pointed out that that statement was false, wrong, incorrect, historically silly.

you made a statement about Czechs forming Churchs in 45 AD? your Question was “There were people and groups in N-W EUrope that did not know of the See of Rome” —> PROVE IT.

The “SEE” of Rome in the sense of Roman Catohlicism didn’t exist until the fourth century. All history that says it existed earlier is fabricated by the same “SEE.”

“Strawman alert — that’s not the statement you made, you said “There were people and groups in N-W EUrope that did not know of the See of Rome”. I pointed out that that statement was false, wrong, incorrect, historically silly.”

You can not say with any knowledge that there were not Christians in NW Europe without any knowledge of the “SEE” of Rome, because you don’t know that there were not.

There were churches in Rome, not one central diocese all through the first century, and many believers who traveled north had never been to Rome, and didn’t have any connection with any church(es) there.