You wrote:
“What I posted was an excerpt.”
So it’s not a distortion because it’s an excerp? What? It still says that a catholic news agency said XYZ when in reality it WAS AN IRANIAN NEWS AGENCY. You think it being an excerpt some how changes that reality?
“Try reading the rest of the thread and find out for yourself. Don’t make me do your homework for you.”
I’m not. I’m asking you about NOW. You posted a post in this thread. It is a distortion you were called on more than two years ago. Do you at least admit that it is a distortion or will you continue to dodge?
By the way, I just checked through this entire thread - easy enough when it’s only 30 some odd posts long - and saw that you no where took responsibility for posting this distortion: “To quote a Catholic news organization, “Our Lady of Fatima is really Fatima, daughter of the Prophet Mohammed,” EVEN THOUGH YOU WERE CALLED ON EXACTLY THIS DISTORTION MORE THAN TWO YEARS AGO.
Will you now admit that what you posted is a distortion or will you continue to dodge that simple question?
Try reading the rest of the thread I linked to and find out for yourself. Do I need to tie your shoes for you and pin a note to your collar as well?