You wrote:
“That was the question I asked; you have not answered it.”
The question you asked was already answered by me in post #75. This is at least the 3rd time I have pointed that out and at least the second time I pointed out the specific post #.
“Where in the Scripture does it say Christ saves the unborn?”
Already answered...again...in post #75.
“Apparently you don’t know the Bible; you have to get spoon-fed by an ever-shifting cabal in Rome to be told what to believe.”
Uh, no. There is not an “ever-shifting cabal in Rome”. That phrase tells us more about you then it does about the Church.
“The verses included within are true; the spirit of the Bible is not present, just like the Cliff Notes for any book loses the spirit and main meaning of the book. Wouldn’t expect you to pick up on the subtlety, though...”
And you’re still wrong. I picked up on the fact that you’re still wrong. That’s not subtle. It’s glaringly obvious.
“Eight years at St. Alphonsus, and 4 years at Bishop O’Dea High School. Catholic. Apparently a bit above your level since subtle innuendo escapes your grasp.”
No, you seem to think like a public school grad no matter where you originally went to school. If you can’t read post #75, then you have serious issues.
“I guess the Christian Brothers of Ireland are a bit more dry than the Jesuits you’re used to?”
Never had Jesuits of teachers. At least they could read post #75, however.
OK, let's look at 1 Peter 3:19:
through whom also he went and preached to the spirits in prison
Nope, no reference to unborn babies there! If that's your answer, you definitely fail...
Uh, no. There is not an “ever-shifting cabal in Rome”. That phrase tells us more about you then it does about the Church.
So that group is never-shifting? The Magisterium is immortal, the Pope never dies? Wow, I guess Sister Mary Elizabeth was wrong - some men DO live forever!
And you’re still wrong. I picked up on the fact that you’re still wrong. That’s not subtle. It’s glaringly obvious.
Yes, I'm wrong because you say I'm wrong, no evidence or Scripture to the contrary. You believe it, ergo it is true. In the face of such withering attack and logic, a tower of intellect and reason, why I have no choice but to concede!
Never had Jesuits of teachers. At least they could read post #75, however.
I'm not denying they could read 1 Peter 3:19; however, how they get the salvation of unborn babies from that verse is apparently quite unknown.
Must have been handed down by the eternal cabal in Rome, that way as to avoid that messy reading and learning of the Bible...