OK, let's look at 1 Peter 3:19:
through whom also he went and preached to the spirits in prison
Nope, no reference to unborn babies there! If that's your answer, you definitely fail...
Uh, no. There is not an “ever-shifting cabal in Rome”. That phrase tells us more about you then it does about the Church.
So that group is never-shifting? The Magisterium is immortal, the Pope never dies? Wow, I guess Sister Mary Elizabeth was wrong - some men DO live forever!
And you’re still wrong. I picked up on the fact that you’re still wrong. That’s not subtle. It’s glaringly obvious.
Yes, I'm wrong because you say I'm wrong, no evidence or Scripture to the contrary. You believe it, ergo it is true. In the face of such withering attack and logic, a tower of intellect and reason, why I have no choice but to concede!
Never had Jesuits of teachers. At least they could read post #75, however.
I'm not denying they could read 1 Peter 3:19; however, how they get the salvation of unborn babies from that verse is apparently quite unknown.
Must have been handed down by the eternal cabal in Rome, that way as to avoid that messy reading and learning of the Bible...
You wrote:
“Nope, no reference to unborn babies there! If that’s your answer, you definitely fail...”
Can you read? Seriously, can you? Read post 75 all the way through. ALL THE WAY THROUGH.
“So that group is never-shifting? The Magisterium is immortal, the Pope never dies? Wow, I guess Sister Mary Elizabeth was wrong - some men DO live forever!”
Ever-shifting cabal. The Vatican is not a cabal. The people in it are not a cabal. The Vatican is not ever-shifting. The people in it are not ever-shifting. The White House has a cabal - since those in it are literally part of ONE party. It changes every four to eight years. That’s ever-shifting.
“Yes, I’m wrong because you say I’m wrong, no evidence or Scripture to the contrary.”
Your errors require little evidence other than common sense to show.
“You believe it, ergo it is true. In the face of such withering attack and logic, a tower of intellect and reason, why I have no choice but to concede!”
If you can’t even read post 75, you mights as well concede.
“I’m not denying they could read 1 Peter 3:19; however, how they get the salvation of unborn babies from that verse is apparently quite unknown.”
Anbd who claimed that? I posted the comment about 1 Peter because of WHAT YOU CLAIMED. Again, read post 75 ALL THE WAY THROUGH.
“Must have been handed down by the eternal cabal in Rome, that way as to avoid that messy reading and learning of the Bible...”
Keep embarrassing yourself. I don’t mind. When you actually read post 75, let me know.