No there isn't. It didn't exist until the nineteenth century. Are you telling me that a pure flight of fancy that is only two hundred years old for which proof is inherently impossible has anything positive to contribute vis a vis the immemorial Tradition?
A surgeon’s scalpel is a tool for good in skilled hands, a tool for evil in the hands of a murderer. It’s all in how you use the tools.
This is a pure non-sequitur. See above.
Sola Scriptura, KJV-Only, Fundamentalist Baptists have more in common with Islam that with historical Christianity. And that’s history for you. ;-)
And islam is closer to the Truth than historical chr*stianity.
I don't suppose you've ever heard of Torah min Shamayyim?
Yes. As long as it doesn't replace immemorial Tradition. But then again we differ on what "immemorial Tradition" is.
This is a pure non-sequitur. See above.
It's only a non-sequitur if we accept your answer as the only possible, true answer. But that's what we're discussing aren't we? Your argument is circular and non-probative. A "non-sequitur" in its own right. Let's move on, shall we?
And islam is closer to the Truth than historical chr*stianity.
Then we disagree. Profundly.
I don't suppose you've ever heard of Torah min Shamayyim?
No, but I've heard of "Torah Min-Hashamayim." Might be a matter of simple spelling and transliteration from the Hebrew.
"The Torah from Heaven," the title of Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological masterpiece. Heschel is a highly-respected theologian on both sides of the Jewish-Christian divide. But, although I've heard of the work, I haven't read it, nor do I know why is it relevant to the divine inspiration and integrity of the Koran, or to the acuity of KJV-Only, Independent, Fundamentalists Baptist a la Pensacola Bible Institute.
You will have to elucidate.
-Theo