[TheThirdRuffian]

“There are some that are saying that they tested part of the Shroud where a patch was placed later, therefore skewing the results.”

I saw that on this thread. That’s news to me.

Lots of peoples’ faith is very weak to be worried about whether this cloth is real or not.

[Pyro7480]

Lots of peoples’ faith is very weak to be worried about whether this cloth is real or not.

That's the wrong conclusion.

[agere_contra]

Lots of peoples’ faith is very weak to be worried about whether this cloth is real or not.

A person's attachment to reality is very weak if they accept anything the media says about the Shroud without checking.

[Nabber]

Seems to me that your faith is somehow bothered by the potential that this cloth is what it purports to be....

And I can see no reason for that.

[Storm Cloud]

If somebody claimed to have found a toga that Julius Ceasar wore, would you doubt it?

I can't imagine what is so hard about believing that this shroud was the burial shroud of Jesus Christ.

[Mr. Silverback]

Sorry to post three times in a string like this, but this requires a response: Lots of peoples’ faith is very weak to be worried about whether this cloth is real or not.

My brother, that statement is as logic-free as the one the "scientist" made. I'm not aware of any person whose faith in the death and Resurrection of Christ depends on the authenticity of a cloth in an Italian church, and therefore will quit the Faith if it's debunked. Are you? Can you show them to me?