Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cardinal O'Malley Defends Role at Kennedy Rites
The Boston Globe ^ | September 3, 2009 | Michael Paulson

Posted on 09/03/2009 6:57:00 AM PDT by TaxachusettsMan

Cardinal O’Malley issued a forceful defense of his decision to participate in the funeral of Senator Kennedy; revealed the substance of a conversation he had with President Obama: Catholic bishops are “anxious to support a plan for universal health care, but we will not support a plan that will include a provision for abortion or could open the way to abortions in the future.’’

But the most impassioned part of the cardinal’s blog post is a de facto plea for greater civility among Catholics when discussing divisive issues. He warned against “harsh judgments’’ and attributing “the worst motives’’ to people with whom Catholics have disagreements, saying “these attitudes and practices do irreparable damage to the communion of the Church.’’

O’Malley said he regretted Kennedy’s support for abortion rights. But “As archbishop of Boston, I considered it appropriate to represent the church at this liturgy out of respect for the senator, his family, those who attended the Mass and all those who were praying for the senator and his family at this difficult time. We are people of faith and we believe in a loving and forgiving God from whom we seek mercy.’’

Raymond Arroyo at EWTN wrote: “The prayer intercessions, endless eulogies, image of the cardinal reading prayers, and finally Cardinal McCarrick interring the remains sent an uncontested message: One may defy church teaching, publicly lead others astray, deprive innocent lives of their rights, and still be seen a good Catholic, even an exemplary one.’’

Also praise. Rev. James Martin, associate editor at America magazine, wrote, “Cardinal O’Malley’s decision to attend the funeral is large-hearted, compassionate, pastoral, sensitive and, above all, Christian.’’

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bravosierra; cardinalomalley; catholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last
To: red irish
"The Catholic Church in Massachusetts did not shepherd Kennedy. They let him down"

Good point.

101 posted on 09/03/2009 12:03:17 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Ask His forgiveness. Don't wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk; presently no screen name; jjm2111; All
Moscow's Assault on the Vatican
Follow the link-Long, but well worth reading.
102 posted on 09/03/2009 12:29:19 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Ask His forgiveness. Don't wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Most of the Southern clergy of all denominations were on the side of the Confederacy, and Catholics were no exception. The future first bishop of St Augustine, Bp Augustin Verot, originally from France, thought that slavery was wrong but that blacks needed paternalistic care because African culture was so different and now that they were in such a different country, they could not be expected to simply make their way on their own without the institution of slavery.

However, in theory Catholic slave owners were expected to do things like permit manumission upon the death or decision of the “owner,” permit the religious instruction and baptism of slaves, permit and encourage their marriages, allow them to own property, not separate families by selling children and parents separately, etc. These were the rules first used by the Spanish in St Augustine. There weren’t that many Catholics in the South, so this didn’t have a major impact, unfortunately.

Interestingly, after the Civil War, the Catholic dioceses adapted fairly well. Bp Verot brought a religious order to St Augustine just to teach the children of the recently freed slaves, and he was not the only bishop to be concerned about black education.

Another interesting thing is that Bp Verot went to Vatican I in 1869 primarily to urge a vote on something he considered vitally important: a rejection of the “two creations” theory. This was a theory popular in Southern Protestant circles that declared that blacks and whites had been created separately, and that blacks had been created by God to serve whites. Bp Verot gave an impassioned address about this and the need to reject it, but the problem was that most of the assembled bishops had never even heard of the theory, which seems to have been an American speciality and unknown outside of the US, and didn’t want to spend any time on it. So he went back without that decision, although he did get support for a resolution supporting the independence and value of scientific research (which was a hot topic among the bishops).


103 posted on 09/03/2009 1:00:29 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111

http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/000317/pope.shtml


104 posted on 09/03/2009 1:00:46 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: red irish

Excellent! John the Baptist - right on! He spoke the Truth no matter what it cost! These weak kneed robe wearing wusses couldn’t hold a candle to John! They do not belong in ministry - they robbed the Church of what it means to be a Christian by their example.


105 posted on 09/03/2009 1:07:52 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
It's called defending the faith.

Your post is an interesting read. It reminds me of something I read just this morning in my Bible study:

Galatians:

Gal 2:11 When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong.

Gal 2:14 When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter in front of them all, ......

Sometimes keeping the faith and defending the gospel is a difficult challenge, but God knows, and will ultimately judge, all we do, or don't do, to proclaim him and his word to the world.

106 posted on 09/03/2009 1:11:53 PM PDT by Col Freeper (FR is a smorgasbord of Conservative thoughts and ideas - dig in and enjoy it to its fullest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

>>>> I don’t think the Catholic hierarchy spoke out against slavery. <<<<

>>And we can add the Holocaust to their ‘do nothing’ list. <<

When I was in Boston in the lat 90s, the Globe ran a front-page article about how the Catholic Church had never denounced Nazism. On the back page was a picture of the Boston Globe “sixty years ago, today.” The headline screaming across the entire broadsheet was that the “Pope Condemns Twin Terrors of Totalitarianism,” that is, Stalinism and Fascism.

The fact is that while the U.S. was still turning a blind eye towards the Nazi regime, the Catholic Church was boldly insisting that men of good will must do all they could to counter the Nazis. For this stance, tens of thousands of Catholic priests and nuns were slaughtered in Central Europe.

Likewise, Catholic popes have issued several bulls and epistles regarding the inherent evil of the slavery of blacks and Amerindians. At the time, however, most Catholics in America were Northerners, who had little say in such goings on. The indentured servitude of Northern laborers often rivaled plantation slavery in cruelty; young children locked in factories for sixteen hours a day, using dangerous equipment. On many occasions, hundreds would die in fires, since they were locked in. As my uncle (who worked as a child laborer in the 1920s, losing fingers in the mill) put it, “the difference between the Northern slaves and Southern slaves was that the Southern slaves had a positive economic value; their masters used brutality to keep them in line, but at the end of the day, a dead slave was a lost investment. A dead Catholic meant nothing.”


107 posted on 09/03/2009 4:07:35 PM PDT by dangus (I am JimThompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Actually, I believe that was John Crysostom, “the Golden-Mouthed.”


108 posted on 09/03/2009 4:09:33 PM PDT by dangus (I am JimThompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan

In 21st century America, never trust a man with a beard.


109 posted on 09/03/2009 5:59:22 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: dsc
In 21st century America, never trust a man with a beard.

Everyone knows that an evil twin always has the beard or goatee. ;-)

110 posted on 09/03/2009 6:02:58 PM PDT by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: marbren
So the role of the church should be moral policemen for unbelievers?

Yes, if those unbelievers are members.

111 posted on 09/03/2009 6:14:35 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ('Arammi 'oved 'Avi vayered Mitzraymah vayagor sham bimtei me`at; vayhi-sham legoy gadol `atzum varav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Actually, I believe that was John Crysostom(sic), “the Golden-Mouthed.”

You are mistaken. Chrysostom is credited with the following:

""The Road to Hell is paved with the bones of priests and monks and the skulls of bishops are the lamp posts that light the way."

More than likely Chrysostom, 344-407, modified the quote of Athanasius, 297-373.

112 posted on 09/03/2009 6:20:52 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine

if the Cardinal wanted to show mercy and to help the family in time of suffering, he could have had a priest say the mass at a quiet, private mass. No media, no TV, no “big stars” like Obama.

so much for his argument.


113 posted on 09/03/2009 6:22:04 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Pray for Israel! And Georgia ! And the Iranian people! and Honduras!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

You are an idiot.


114 posted on 09/03/2009 6:24:08 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: marbren
All; I was just curious, How many people on this thread think they are better, more righteous, than Ted Kennedy?

Anyone who is NOT a communist/socialist/marxist partnered up with another god deciding who should live and who should die!!!!

115 posted on 09/03/2009 6:32:16 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: livius
Another interesting thing is that Bp Verot went to Vatican I in 1869 primarily to urge a vote on something he considered vitally important: a rejection of the “two creations” theory. This was a theory popular in Southern Protestant circles that declared that blacks and whites had been created separately, and that blacks had been created by God to serve whites. Bp Verot gave an impassioned address about this and the need to reject it, but the problem was that most of the assembled bishops had never even heard of the theory, which seems to have been an American speciality and unknown outside of the US, and didn’t want to spend any time on it. So he went back without that decision, although he did get support for a resolution supporting the independence and value of scientific research (which was a hot topic among the bishops).

Interesting. I've heard of a polygenistic defense of slavery that held that Blacks weren't descended from Adam. Perhaps this is what you're talking about. Although if the "scientific research" he was promoting was evolutionism it seems to me he'd be turning around and advocating the very same thing.

I spent most of the day at a historic Civil War battlefield near where I live. That's why I haven't been online today.

116 posted on 09/03/2009 6:32:45 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ('Arammi 'oved 'Avi vayered Mitzraymah vayagor sham bimtei me`at; vayhi-sham legoy gadol `atzum varav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

O’Malley is a damn fool and should be ex-communicated from the Catholic Church. I am a catholic and now the world is a better place without Shamoo the OldsMoSub Murdering POS alleged senator stealing our good oxygen.

I for one, am glad to see that obese POS taking his well deserved dirtnap for enternity in Hell.

Molon Labe,


117 posted on 09/03/2009 6:37:38 PM PDT by No Surrender No Retreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus; presently no screen name; livius
In 1537 Pope Paul lll published and disseminated a "Papal Bull" entitled "Sublimus Deus". In the document he clearly stated that no man is to be enslaved,all have a need and a right to hear God's word and to be converted and that no one could take the property of another.

Just as Pope Benedict's words,to audiences and in official documents go unheeded,so did the words and sanctions of Pope Paul lll. You can find lots of information on this by Googling the title,"Sublimus Deus".

Because of holy and prescient truths that have so often come from the mouths and pens of our Popes,I double check every thing I am told by c/Catholics,religious or lay,against the Popes' words,documents and the Catholic Catechism.

I am very grateful to be Catholic because the teachings of Christ are clear,because the Church has preserved these teachings and because there is a formal structure with a visible authority figure. Finally,if for some reason I still can't figure something out,then I remember what one of the nuns said in third or fourth grade,"well,if it wasn't a miracle then it's quite a mystery". And I smile and know when I'm ready for it,He will let me understand it.

BTW I pray for the Pope every night,he needs all of our prayers in these terrible times.

118 posted on 09/03/2009 8:00:03 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

Hey Cardinal...

May the good lord have mercy on your soul. Posers like you are the reason I left the Catholic church. You have no honor and no moral authority.

Resign now, and get yourself a wife while you still can. Whatever you do, don’t go around convincing yourself that your anything special!


119 posted on 09/03/2009 8:05:53 PM PDT by Greenpees (Coulda Shoulda Woulda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
You are wrong on both counts.

And as an aside,Catholics and nonCatholics of any or no religion are doing a disservice to Jewish people by constantly bringing the "holocaust" into every conversation or discussion of anything related or unrelated to other peoples' sufferings and sadness.

120 posted on 09/03/2009 8:10:37 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson