Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Assumption of Mary
Christian Resources ^ | William Webster

Posted on 08/17/2009 9:10:31 AM PDT by AnalogReigns

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 381-383 next last
To: wagglebee

I’m not certain LUTHER retained ‘Luther’s Marian beliefs’...


281 posted on 08/17/2009 1:10:41 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
This insistence on deprecating the Mother of God as some kind of mere life-support system for a Savior is bizarre.
282 posted on 08/17/2009 1:11:28 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

>>I left the cult long ago<<

What cult?


283 posted on 08/17/2009 1:15:06 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“While Luther could call Mary the “Mother of God,” he was far more concerned to say something about the work of God in Christ than about her, thus, he un-deified her by definition. His usage was not intended to be a quasi-divine statement of veneration similar to medieval or current Roman Catholic trends. When Luther abandoned aspects of Mariology like the Immaculate Conception, it served to further un-deify the goddess. Christ was the only one conceived sinless ruling the throne of the heart, the only Savior in whom one could place their complete trust. While retaining such beliefs like perpetual virginity, Luther did so in un-dogmatic terms, making sure that Mary was not to be deified for such an attribute. He implied in the Table Talk that it was Mary’s choice to remain a virgin after the birth of Christ, rather than her continued virginity being a miraculous gift from God.”

For the Catholics on this thread, I understand the whole “Mary is not a deity” idea. This article is written from the perspective of Luther, and would need to be evaluated in light of the common practices of the 1500s.

FWIW - the full article is posted here: http://www.ntrmin.org/Luthers%20Theology%20of%20Mary.htm


284 posted on 08/17/2009 1:15:23 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
When we say "Hail Mary full of grace" we quote the angel sent to gain Mary's consent to made Mother of God. Her submission "behold the handmaid of the Lord" is a model of Christian faith.

That statement in and of itself is quite remarkable. I may be wrong about this, but I'd be hard-pressed to think of any other place in the New Testament where an angel (the archangel Gabriel, no less) offered a salutation of this kind to a human being.

285 posted on 08/17/2009 1:15:30 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; lightman
I’m not certain LUTHER retained ‘Luther’s Marian beliefs’...

Then please point out specifically when he renounced them.

286 posted on 08/17/2009 1:15:42 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Some Lutherans

Do you have a source for that statement? I think we can agree that 'traditional Lutherans' would exclude ELCA. Of course in general, 'Christian' might exclude ELCA on their current path.

Traditional Lutherans in the true sense of the word would mean LCMS and WELS. I believe in this respect, you are in error.

287 posted on 08/17/2009 1:15:50 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

When ‘Mother of God’ is used as though she was ‘Mrs Holy Spirit’, or ‘God the Mother’, it becomes even more bizarre. The extremes in this debate are not good places to be.


288 posted on 08/17/2009 1:18:18 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
The Roman Catholic Church has elevated her to godhood.

LOL! That's just silly and is completely contrary to all Catholic doctrine. Do you actually read what you type before you hit the post button?

I was merely giving my interpretation of a scene I have seen many times.

So, at least we've clarified that it is your interpretation. It's just too bad that your interpretation is incorrect.

By definition, yes. But I am not suggesting you rely on her for your salvation or that you pray to her.

Catholics do not rely upon Mary for salvation either. You've created the perfect strawman. Nice work.

289 posted on 08/17/2009 1:19:03 PM PDT by theanonymouslurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
The extremes in this debate are not good places to be.

That's why I hang out in the middle with His Church, the pillar and ground of the Truth.

290 posted on 08/17/2009 1:19:48 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
As someone who went through the Ordination ceremony for priesthood, I would disagree.

Would you care to share any further information about this rather extraordinary claim?

291 posted on 08/17/2009 1:23:12 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xone; lightman

It had been my understanding that some Lutherans maintained Marian beliefs that are similar to Catholicism.


292 posted on 08/17/2009 1:25:26 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I'll even go one step further, too, Petronski . . .

Go back and look carefully at the salutation of the angel Gabriel. This salutation itself ("Hail, full of grace!") makes a very clear statement about the unique nature of Mary. In general terms, grace is the means by which humans are granted salvation by God and saved from the effects of original sin. Grace by definition is the result of Christ's Redemptive mission, and Old Testament figures did not enjoy any fruits of this Redemption while they lived on this earth (even those who were greatly favored by God).

In this context, this statement by Gabriel that Mary was "full of grace" can be seen as a remarkable acknowlegement that she had already been given the benefit of Christ's Redemption before He died on the cross and rose from the dead.

293 posted on 08/17/2009 1:28:44 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

>>Unfortunately, your church claims I MUST believe in something not mentioned in scripture, nor by anyone during the first 4-500 years, or risk damnation.<<

I’m so sorry you are uninformed about the Catholic church’s teaching on your damnation. Start here.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070629_responsa-quaestiones_en.html

Here’s something to look at

“Rather, it comes from and brings out more clearly the fact that there are “numerous elements of sanctification and of truth” which are found outside her structure, but which “as gifts properly belonging to the Church of Christ, impel towards Catholic Unity”.[11]

“It follows that these separated churches and Communities, though we believe they suffer from defects, are deprived neither of significance nor importance in the mystery of salvation. In fact the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as instruments of salvation”

Come into the light my FRiend. The Catholic Church doesn’t say you must believe in anything, to make it to heaven.
That’s up to God.


294 posted on 08/17/2009 1:29:22 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Text, without Context is Pretext.

I know it well. This is yet another reason of proof for the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Thanks

295 posted on 08/17/2009 1:34:20 PM PDT by frogjerk (tagline pulled for verification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; lightman
Mary

Q. I've heard that Martin Luther believed in Mary's immaculate conception, in her perpetual virginity and in praying to her. Is this how Lutherans still view Mary today?

A. Like Luther himself, Lutherans hold Mary in high esteem for the chosen role she played in God's plan of salvation. Lutherans have never objected to denoting Mary as the "Mother of God" (theotokos, "God-bearer"), since she was the mother of Jesus and Jesus was and is indeed God. Since the Son of God was and is sinless, it is evident that some miraculous "exception" was made in the conception of Jesus through Mary that prevented original sin from tainting the Christ-child. This accounts for Luther's comments about Mary being "entirely without sin" (as far as the conception was concerned). Lutherans today are not bound to Luther's personal views regarding how this was accomplished; in any event, it is clear from Luther's other and later writings on Mary that he did not hold to the view that Mary was personally devoid of all sin (which would mean that she would have had no need of forgiveness or salvation). Luther also held to the semper virgo (the perpetual virginity) of Mary. This, again, is a personal view to which Lutherans today are not bound. Scripture is not clear on this matter, and Lutherans do not regard it as a theological issue.

In his early years Luther was still greatly influenced by his rigorous Roman Catholic and monastic training. In his later writings he clearly rejects invocation to Mary and/or the saints as having no Scriptural mandate or promise. None of this undermines the opening sentence of this e-mail, which should be underscored as the final word on this issue.

From the LCMS website:

http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=2195

Lightman can give the ELCA answer.

296 posted on 08/17/2009 1:34:33 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

bablefish


297 posted on 08/17/2009 1:38:00 PM PDT by woollyone (I believe God created me- you believe you're related to monkeys. Of course I laughed at you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: woollyone

I have to say.
I truly adore your tagline!


298 posted on 08/17/2009 1:45:14 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: xone; lightman

Thanks for this.

Would I be correct then in saying that while traditional Lutherans may or may not share basic Marian beliefs with Catholics, they generally have no major issues with Catholics on the subject?


299 posted on 08/17/2009 1:46:10 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; Petronski
Along the same lines:

From The Meaning of Kecharitomene: Full of Grace (Luke 1:28)

"Kecharitomene" ('Full of Grace' in the Greek text) means "having been" or "have already been" graced.

It also shows a completeness with a permanent result

300 posted on 08/17/2009 1:46:35 PM PDT by frogjerk (tagline pulled for verification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 381-383 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson