Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archbishop Burke Slams Obama's Appearance at Notre Dame
FOX News ^ | May 8, 2009 | FOXNews

Posted on 05/08/2009 9:39:12 AM PDT by TaxachusettsMan

One of the Vatican's highest ranked clerics and a frequent critic of President Obama said Friday that Notre Dame is causing a "scandal" by giving the president an honorary degree and a platform to address graduates at its commencement next weekend.

'The proposed granting of an honorary doctorate at Notre Dame University to our president, who is so aggressively advancing an anti-life and anti-family agenda, is rightly the source of the greatest scandal," said Archbishop Raymond Burke, who is the prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, the Vatican's highest court.

Burke, the former archbishop of St. Louis and vocal opponent of giving communion to politicians who support abortion rights, told Catholics at a national prayer breakfast in Washington, D.C., that "with unparalleled arrogance, our nation is choosing to renounce its foundation on the faithful."

He pointed to several Obama administration decisions that he said have damaged "the fundamental society that is the family," citing the repeal of the conscience clause, which prohibits health care workers from refusing to participate in abortion-related services; repeal of the Mexico City policy, which allows federal funding to be used abroad to provide abortions; presidential support of the Freedom of Choice Act, which prevents government from in any way denying or interfering with a woman's right to choose; and support of the U.S. Population Fund, which he noted supports China's one-child policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; bhoabortion; catholic; notredame; notredamescandal; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Miss Marple

Ack!

Holy Gather should read Holy Father!


21 posted on 05/08/2009 2:38:47 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

>>Ppeople who have fallen away from the evangelical or Protestant churches tend to either identify themselves as “protestant” or “unaffiliated” or something like that.

Catholics, because of a strong cultural identity, tend to identify themselves as Catholic even if they haven’t been to mass since they were kids. Those people are lumped in with the practicing Catholics in order to arrive at that number. Obama’s support among weekly mass attenders was much smaller.<<

I was having a debate with a friend and we both started googling. We were both right.

I said the Catholic church is the fastest growing - that’s true because most immigrants are Catholic.

He said the Catholic church was the fastest declining - he had a point because their church attendance is declining most and they have more parishes closing.


22 posted on 05/08/2009 2:50:04 PM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

Ok, What is Fr Jenkins saying about all this?

There is so much uproar that he cannot miss it. Is he just ignoring it all and pretending it is not happening? Or does he release a statement occasionally, or....???


23 posted on 05/08/2009 5:34:28 PM PDT by KarenMarie (NEVER believe anything coming out of DC until it's been denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

Straight from the Vatican!

Burke didn’t have people skills, but he knows the Catholic law and Catholic reasoning.

God bless him for that!


24 posted on 05/08/2009 6:49:46 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

The audacity of unparalleled arrogance!


25 posted on 05/09/2009 4:28:08 AM PDT by NewCenturions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Well, first the Catholic Church does NOT have a doctrinal position against the death penalty. Pope John Paul II had an opinion that the death penalty was not morally beneficial in the Western world (i.e., Europe and North America), given the stability of democracy and conformity of the rule of law. However, consider:

* John Paul was speaking only as to OPINION on matters of PRUDENTIAL judgement. He emphatically rejected the notion that he was establishing doctrine, and harshly condemned any attempts to morally equivocate abortion to the death penalty, not only on the basis that abortion is tens of thousands of times more common in the West, but on the basis that abortion is certainly a grave evil, whereas the death penalty is not.

* John Paul’s statements were stated very precisely, and are thus doctrinally sound, but the more casual interpretation of them is, in fact, heresy: The Catechism of the Council of Trent, published with the authority of the ecumenical council of Trent, and written by Saint Charles Borromeo, one of only 33 Doctors of the Church, stated that the death penalty was in fact morally obligatory to rescue the souls of the aggrieved from the temptation to retribution or despairing against divine justice.

* John Paul’s statements were based on the assertion that Western democracies’ rule of law was unchallenged by criminal activity, an assertion appeared true in the 1990s when John Paul asserted it, but seems less true today.


However,... I believe Ronald Reagan was given an honorary degree. In any case, the degree Obama is being given is a law degree. This can only be taken as an endorsement of Obama’s legal notions, which are an absolute abomination to not only Christ and humanity but rational thought, itself. His law exams were literally exercises in creating rationalizations to subvert democracy and morality. (and I mean “literally” literally!) For instance, a typical question notes that the prevailing interpretation of a state constitution supports an at-face reading. A ballot initiative reaffirmed the constitution by an overwhelming majority. (meaning the majority of the constituents, the courts, the legislature, and the at-face text of the constitution all support a law.) The students’ task was to create a legal ruling to subvert the law. And no, this wasn’t like Spock’s unwinnable academy exam; they were expected to nullify democracy if they wanted to pass.

A law school giving Obama an honorary law degree is like a Tibetan monk ordaining the Chinese dictators.


26 posted on 05/09/2009 6:42:39 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan
Petition Here
27 posted on 05/09/2009 6:47:32 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
Here
28 posted on 05/09/2009 6:48:09 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dangus
This can only be taken as an endorsement of Obama’s legal notions, which are an absolute abomination to not only Christ and humanity but rational thought, itself.

Fr. Jenkins is showing his true colors.

29 posted on 05/09/2009 6:48:49 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KarenMarie
Here is his statement. It looks like a revised statement. Forget the "further positive engagement." In a letter to the Cardinal Newman Society, Jenkins said, “conditions for constructive dialogue simply do not exist” rescinding any dialogue with the student group.
30 posted on 05/09/2009 6:53:39 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
As a convert, I was shocked that some of the things I knew about the Church and her teachings was unknown to cradle Catholics in my own parish.

Thankfully, things are beginning to turn around, but the Barque of Peter is a large ship, which turns slowly. It will probably be another 10 years before things are really squared away. The Holy Gather is a true blessing to us, and may he live long years more and confound those who want to wreck the Church.

*********************

I was thinking to myself, goodness, she's go me there, I've never heard of the "Holy Gather". Heh. :)

31 posted on 05/09/2009 6:56:07 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Obama White House Urges Tax-Funded Abortion-on-Demand in D.C.
32 posted on 05/09/2009 7:00:10 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cornelis

Thank you for replying to me.

May I ask... do you know when this was released? I remember reading something that was said to have been from Fr. Jenkins that had a blatantly ‘screw you’ tone to it. That was when this issue first arose.

The statement I just read is disgusting. I think I prefer the ‘screw you’ tone over the ‘Obama is the greatest man ever. We need to count ourselves blessed that this near perfect man is coming and if you don’t agree it is because of race’ (at least that is what *I* get from that statement)

May I also ask.... Is there any chance that Fr. Jenkins will face punishment for this...perhaps removal from the school?

We signed a petition to have ND removed from the Kenedy Directory.

Thanks for your time.
:)


33 posted on 05/09/2009 11:28:02 AM PDT by KarenMarie (NEVER believe anything coming out of DC until it's been denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gitmogrunt

67% is not really the flock. These are nominal Catholics who claim to be ‘Catholic’, but don’t attend Mass and couldn’t tell you much about the Catholic Faith if their life depended upon it (at least nothing accurate).


34 posted on 05/17/2009 8:21:20 PM PDT by Fedele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fedele

Anyone can tell a poll taker they are Catholic. Anyone. It is not like proof is demanded. And anyone who wants to skew a poll can lie. These polls mean absolutely nothing.


35 posted on 05/17/2009 10:08:50 PM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fedele
67% is not really the flock. These are nominal Catholics who claim to be ‘Catholic’, but don’t attend Mass and couldn’t tell you much about the Catholic Faith if their life depended upon it (at least nothing accurate).

Exactly. They are lost sheep evading the shepherd.
36 posted on 05/18/2009 8:06:21 AM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson