Skip to comments.
Prophecy Pundits are at it Again
American Vision ^
| February 23, 2009
| Gary DeMar
Posted on 02/24/2009 10:10:12 AM PST by topcat54
Calvary Chapel of Chino California held The Southern California Prophecy Conference last week (Feb. 2022, 2009). I wonder if those who came to hear speakers like Tim LaHaye, Mark Hitchcock, Paul McGuire, David Hocking, David Reagan, and Ed Hindson were aware that Chuck Smith, the founder of the Calvary Chapel network of churches, made some very definite predictions about when the rapture was going to take place.
While cleaning up my office, I came across a cassette tape of a sermon Chuck Smith preached on December 31, 1979. He told his very accepting audience on that day that the rapture would take place in 1981. The former Soviet Republic going into Afghanistan in August of 1978 was the prelude to what Smith considered to be a full-force invasion of the Middle East. It would not be long before Russia would invade Israel, Smith told his audience. All of this was said to have been predicted by Ezekiel 2600 years ago.
Smith went on to claim in his end-of-the-year message of 30 years ago that because of ozone depletion Revelation 16:8 would be fulfilled during the soon-coming Great Tribulation: And the fourth angel poured out his bowl upon the sun; and it was given to it to scorch men with fire. According to Smith, Halleys Comet would pass near the earth in 1986 and would wreck atmospheric havoc for those left behind as debris from its million-mile tail pummeled the earth. Halleys Comet did appear in 1986 with no damage done to our planet. (A similar prelude to the end had been predicted based on the so-called Jupiter Effect.[1]) ...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanvision.org ...
TOPICS: Theology
KEYWORDS: dispensationalism; eschatology; preterism; prophecy; tribulation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-373 last
To: raynearhood; Iscool; Lee N. Field; Cvengr
God lists the 12 tribes as HE determines who they are...It may not be the same 12 tribes that started out initially but so what??? So you agree, then, that the nation of Israel with whom God made a Covenant is not the same nation of Israel in Revelation? The entire bloodline of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are not there.
Either that or God is very fickle. Take the poor tribe of Dan, for example. One minute its in, then its out, then its back in again (according to futurism).
To: topcat54
Essentially, it does not matter WHICH of the blood descendants God decrees to fill the bill for the 12 tribes.
Even on tribe reaping the promises God promised to the blood descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
would flush REPLACEMENTARIAN PRETERIST HOGWASH DOWN THE TOILET WHOLESALE.
362
posted on
03/06/2009 10:40:50 AM PST
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Quix
Your frothing at the fingers
Of all your replies, this is the first I can remember that brought a smile to my face. At least the above statement did. "Frothing at the fingers..." I like it. I've personally used: "I could keep driving home the point until I'm blue in the fingers, but..." Anyhow, I'll probably use it in the future.
It's also rather mystifying psychologically. Why would anyone calling themselves "Christian" work so hard to call God a liar?
I call myself a Christian because I have been justified by faith through the redemptive work of Christ. I have never called God a liar. I simply call your interpretation of Scripture incorrect, your theology silly, and your attempts to exegete newspapers against Scripture misguided.
I haven't laid out all the involved verses and considered all the nuances of that issue.
Until you have, and can reply intelligently without invective assaults and empty arguments, your frothing at the fingers will be ignored on this issue.
363
posted on
03/06/2009 11:05:29 AM PST
by
raynearhood
(<< BEWARE!!! A consistent NAYSAYER posted this reply)
To: Lee N. Field
I’ll throw myself on the mercy of g-d.
To: raynearhood
Until you have, and can reply intelligently without invective assaults and empty arguments, your frothing at the fingers will be ignored on this issue. Don't hold your breath. I've been trying to get him to say something intelligent for quite some time now. Nothing has worked. Like trying to get rid of a harmless but annoying insect.
I suspect he's hiding his abject ignorance of the Bible behind all these cutsie/colorful phrases.
To: topcat54
Don't hold your breath.
I won't. I've been back and forth with Quix before on different, but similar issues of interpretation. The body of the argument has always been the same.
366
posted on
03/06/2009 12:11:31 PM PST
by
raynearhood
(<< BEWARE!!! A consistent NAYSAYER posted this reply)
To: raynearhood
Glad to be of humor service.
Y’all will likely need a lot of humor when the truth begins to slap y’all upside the faces eventually.
367
posted on
03/06/2009 6:43:26 PM PST
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Quix; raynearhood; Lee N. Field
Yall will likely need a lot of humor when the truth begins to slap yall upside the faces eventually.HAH!!!
Now that's funny. Same tune we've been hearing from the futurists "any day now" crowd for decades.
You Israeloholics can tap us on the shoulder when we're supposed to take you seriously, which, from the looks of things won't be anytime soon.
368
posted on
03/06/2009 8:25:11 PM PST
by
topcat54
(Laughing at a futurist is not scoffing at God.)
To: topcat54
Given that you don’t take God’s Word seriously in terms of
GOD ALMIGHTY’S PROPHECIES
REGARDING
THE BLOOD DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, ISAAC AND JACOB
looks like I’m in GREAT COMPANY.
369
posted on
03/06/2009 8:39:18 PM PST
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Quix
looks like Im in GREAT COMPANY. Here they are:
370
posted on
03/06/2009 9:15:07 PM PST
by
topcat54
(Laughing at a futurist is not scoffing at God.)
To: topcat54
Man, I wish I had hair that good.
371
posted on
03/06/2009 9:32:56 PM PST
by
raynearhood
(<<DANGER!!!! Proud NAYSAYER posted this reply!!!)
To: raynearhood
Man, I wish I had hair that good. Not sure. I think whatever they put in it must affect their brain.
372
posted on
03/06/2009 9:49:08 PM PST
by
topcat54
(Laughing at a futurist is not scoffing at God.)
To: topcat54
I think whatever they put in it must affect their brain.
Whatever they put in it, I'd avoid... but just to have the hair to put it in.... oh, that would be glorious.
373
posted on
03/06/2009 10:29:13 PM PST
by
raynearhood
(Experiencing male pattern baldness since 1996)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-373 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson