The question is legitimate. Joseph Smith did not teach trinitarianism, and it was once upon a time a form of modalism. The question is about the form of modalism he taught, but in conclusion it is about his being polytheistic.
The article is not a diatribe. It has the tone of a scholarly presentation. It is no different than any other critique I’ve seen of any other theologian..
I never questioned a legitimate question, I question the same old losers on here who’s only bond with their ilk, is to gather together with a negative cause.
They speak in the name of righteousness, but are really doing the devil’s work by spreading negative energy amongst their fellow man (happy believers) through hurtful murmurings just to fill a void in their lonely lives. They act as a squad of “truth” when in reality, they cast dipsersions to amuse one another and to hear themselves speak. Most of them are single and/or divorced, which prevents them from being truly happy, so they must claim a cause and attach God to it. They will not be rewarded for their deeds, as they all know that Christ’s workings do not include an air of superiorority over their peers.
Let the fruits of our lives determine our judgements, not the calculating and idol words of the unhappy.
And just WHY do you bigots HATE us so?
--MormonDude(I did not understand the article.)