I am very consistent. When speaking about personal conversion and things having to do with personal discussion of discipleship. I'm not doing that as is or should be to you plainly evident. I'm attacking his methodology which deserves an open and frank assessment. Get it?
You wrote:
“I am very consistent.”
No, actually you’re not.
“When speaking about personal conversion and things having to do with personal discussion of discipleship.”
What? You’re missing half a sentence there.
“I’m not doing that as is or should be to you plainly evident.”
Actually you discussed your personal faith - Catholic school, altar boy, blah, blah, blah - so I don’t see how what you;re doing is any different. Be consistent and address Claveau personally as you insist he must do with Baldwin.
“I’m attacking his methodology which deserves an open and frank assessment. Get it?”
No. Be consistent. Address Claveau the same way you insist he should address Baldwin. Follow your own advice. Stop making excuses. Address Cleaveau the same way you insist he should address Baldwin.