You wrote:
“I am very consistent.”
No, actually you’re not.
“When speaking about personal conversion and things having to do with personal discussion of discipleship.”
What? You’re missing half a sentence there.
“I’m not doing that as is or should be to you plainly evident.”
Actually you discussed your personal faith - Catholic school, altar boy, blah, blah, blah - so I don’t see how what you;re doing is any different. Be consistent and address Claveau personally as you insist he must do with Baldwin.
“I’m attacking his methodology which deserves an open and frank assessment. Get it?”
No. Be consistent. Address Claveau the same way you insist he should address Baldwin. Follow your own advice. Stop making excuses. Address Cleaveau the same way you insist he should address Baldwin.
Now you can't follow the logic of simple speech. He engaged a Christian in a lame attempt at Catholic propaganda. He did this in a crude manner by calling him out. I'm not trying to convert anyone to my belief. I'm metaphorically kicking his arse on Free Republic. Maybe try to follow the bouncing ball in this discussion for once? I have no intention on being sensitive and personal with this character. None whatsoever. If I wanted to speak about a person's personal conversion I would do it privately not by doing a dog and pony show over the internet.