Posted on 07/20/2008 9:36:13 PM PDT by Graybeard58
Mormons focus on accessible, social aspects of their religion. Although the Mormon system of doctrine is genuinely attractive to many of its members, many have argued that the primary "glue" of Mormonism is the heritage, culture, and family ties, not the doctrine and theology.
In other words, the typical allegiance to the Mormon organization primarily stems from something other than doctrinal concerns. The average Mormon sitting in a pew does not care how or why their religion works, they only care that it works for them.
They are not concerned with the real character of Joseph Smith or how the LDS scriptures coincide with biblical teachings. A common element often overlooked when Christians share their faith with Latter-day Saints is that many Mormons are not Mormon merely for doctrinal reasons. This view of not being concerned with theology is considered to be atheological. If a person does not care about their theology, they miss the importance of rooting their entire life in the true knowledge of God and a coherent, rational, theological worldview.
A person's relationship with God is built on the foundation of what one believes about God and what it means to be right with God. This is the most important determining factor in shaping the way a person lives.
An atheological person does not seriously reflect on their own foundational worldview assumptions (e.g., what is truth, who is God, does this matter?), nor do they see how doing so would be relevant to everyday life.
South Park, a fictional, satirical cartoon, depicted a Mormon named "Gary" with the following words:
"Look, maybe us Mormons do believe in crazy stories that make absolutely no sense. And maybe Joseph Smith did make it all up. But I have a great life and a great family and I have the Book of Mormon to thank for that. The truth is, I dont care if Joseph Smith made it all up. Because what the church teaches now is loving your family, being nice and helping people. And even though people in this town might think thats stupid, I still choose to believe in it."
Grey Echols, a Mormon, writes the following in a review of By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus:
"This is a well written book which manages to not push an 'anti-Mormon' agenda. However as an LDS I do not think others should read it. Why? Because it could destroy your faith in the church. I am not trying to be clever. If you enjoy all of the good things the church has brought into your life, do you care where it came from?
No other church has so short a history that it can be examined so closely by science. Otherwise we would find that they are all created on the backs of con-artist. I am willing to bet every religion was founded by a fraud. So who cares. Does religion bring us together? Does it bond a nation, a town, a family? If so then let it be.
The truth is fleeting, and life is short. If believing in Santa makes children smile then believing in God makes adults smile. When children find out Santa isn't real, you kill a certain spark you can never get back. When you expose a church as a fraud, you kill a little spark in all of us."
We must be quite a threat to them over at COB (Church Office Builidng) that they would send so many apologists over here. It’s quite an honor to be known as an enemy of Mormonism. As a Christian and an ex-cult member, I proudly wear that badge.
“I am telling the truth because I belong to the Messiah-I am not lying, and my conscience confirms it by means of the Holy Spirit.” (Romans 9:1)
You asked for it!
But of course...
I can't see why this is hard, but I understand, your training runs long and deep, heavy on the rhetoric, very, very lite on the logic...
+++++++++++++++++++++
You seem not to get the idea that your assumptions are no good without using BOTH Joseph Smith’s writings AND THE WRITTINGS OF OTHERS, as a compression to Paul's writings alone.
You and yours keep saying that something written second hand by someone else is as if it was written by Joseph.
How many of the accounts, that you use as evidence that Brother Joseph contradicted himself, were written by Br. Joseph, and how many were written by someone else.
What contractions can you find in the first hand accounts written by Joseph Smith?
I saw that the other day, about busted a gut...
I’m afraid I disagree with your friend. There are too many in Mormonism who will overlook the truth in order to believe the lie.
But have you noticed, it isn’t Christians who are changing to become closer in line with Mormonism, but it is Mormonism that is forced (because of the internet and such) to adopt Christian ideas. Perhaps the Mormon so-called Church will move closer and closer to Christ until they finally are in line with Him.
I see the Thin skinned thread-killer has shown up for duty. Prepare for lock-down.
......You are a son of perdition and an apostate and “I REBUKE YOU BY MY PRIESTHOOD!.....What are you going to do when you are in outer darkness and you look up to see Joseph Smith's face shining brighter than the noonday sun?”
++++++++++++++++
I saw it to, and I know some dumb bishops, but this guy was so dumb he could not have been a bishop.
Rush Limbaugh would call him a “seminary caller”.
Fred, can you relate briefly here, what happened during the “first vision?”
You can link or copy and paste from the official site if you wish.
I am not looking at any accounts, I am not looking at any of the points, I am not there yet.
The simple fact you say you or whomever is comparing (this from YOUR OWN POSTING), the DRIECT WRTITTING of the two men give them equal weighing no matter the inherent argument or addition of non first hand information.
It is just the simple logic of you own statement that I am concerned with. Comparing the DIRCT writings of the two men is apples and apples, and that does not satisfy you.
Oh well, I should learn that logic matters not, for if it did there would be no issues to begin with, for there would be no LDS to argue about.
Well, he said he was “in” the bishopric...maybe just the ward clerk? The first time I heard it, I thought it was pretty dumb, too, but there HAVE been some posters on this forum that I could picture saying these things. Present company excepted, of course. ;) The ones I am thinking of are gone.
I find that satisfying as well. Surrender means victory...
That is true, there will be the hold out zealots for whom no logic or truth will dissuade. After all there are Pagans and Wiccans amongst us as well...
Technically true; as it's the Organization to which you belong doing it.
The Articles of Faith outline 13 basic points of belief of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The Prophet Joseph Smith first wrote them in a letter to John Wentworth, a newspaper editor,
in response to Mr. Wentworth's request to know what members of the Church believed.
They were subsequently published in Church periodicals.
They are now regarded as scripture and included in the Pearl of Great Price.
THE ARTICLES OF FAITH
OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS History of the Church, Vol. 4, pp. 535541
Joseph Smith |
| |||||||
Version Number When Published Brief Description |
Age Year |
Pillar of light |
No. of Person- ages |
Father Present |
Son Present |
Question: Join What Sect? |
Remarks-References |
1. Offical version, written 1838,
first Published 1842
(There are minor differences between the various source references,
Ensign Jan 1985, page 14)
|
14
1820 |
yes | 2 |
yes
Both spoke |
yes |
Join none |
Lucy, Hyrum, Samuel, Sophronia join the Presbyterian Church - JSH, pages 49-50, 1981 edition;
Times & Seasons, March, April 1842;
Ensign Jan. 1985, page 14;
Joseph Smith's First Vision by
Milton V. Backamn, Bookcraft, 1971, 1980, Appendix C, page 160f
|
2. Dictated by Smith to F.G. Williams, Summer to Nov. 1832 | 14 or 15 | yes |
1 | no |
yes Saw Lord, He "spoke" |
No question,
told "None doeth good",
sins forgiven
|
Joseph Smith's First Vision, Appendix A, page 155f |
3. Written by Smith,
his 1832 diary,
in his own hand
|
15 |
yes |
1 |
no |
yes Saw the Lord Jesus Christ |
No question,
told sins forgiven,
all do no good
|
Ensign, Dec. 1984, pages 24-26; ibid, Jan. 1985, page 11 |
4. Smith's diary of 1835,
recorded by
Warren Cowdery,
Nov. 9, 1835, conversation of Smith with Joshua
|
About 14 |
yes |
One, then another like unto first |
?
|
?
Second spoke, saw many angels
|
No questions,
told sins forgiven,
Jesus is Son
|
Joseph Smith's First Vision, Appen. B |
5. Letter form Smith to
John Wentworth,
editor of Chicago Democrat
|
none |
no |
2 |
? They spoke |
? |
No Question |
Joseph Smith's First Vision, Appendix D;
Ensign, Jan 1985, page 16;
Times & Seasons, Vol 3, pages 706-707, March 1, 1842
|
6. Early church leaders
Brigham Young, G.A.Smith,
John Taylor
|
15 |
no |
1 Saw an angel, and asked the angel |
no |
no |
Join none |
See Journal of Discourses,
2:17;
18:239;
13:77, 78;
20:167;
12:333, 334.
|
Yo! Dude!
Listen up!!
This here's my son: Listen to him!
fred is not tearing down the Bible? Well then, he is surely taking a different stance than the apostles of his organization in Mormonism.
who in his right mind, could for one moment, believe the Bible in its present form to be a perfect guide? Who knows that even one verse has escaped pollution, so as to convey the same sense now that it did in the original? (Apostle Orson Pratt, Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon, p.47.)
As all informed persons know, the various versions of the Bible do not accurately record or perfectly preserve the words, thoughts, and intents of the original inspired authors (Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p.383).
The infallibility of the Bible is a fundamental doctrine among Bible cultists, though by their own admission they cannot find a book, chapter, or verse within the Bible to sustain this doctrine. Infallibility and mortality are incompatible. We no more have infallible books than we have infallible men. Such a belief quickly leads to the ridiculous (Joseph Fielding McConkie, Gospel Symbolism, p.232).
Living Prophets® put out second hand info all the time and the Members lap it up like manna.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.