Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Worship of Mary? (An Observation)

Posted on 05/30/2008 10:21:34 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 9,861-9,8809,881-9,9009,901-9,920 ... 11,821-11,826 next last
To: gost2

INDEED.


9,881 posted on 06/28/2008 7:15:26 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9835 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

9,882 posted on 06/28/2008 7:16:11 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9836 | View Replies]

To: Quix

See, you’re not even trying. What’s the point?


9,883 posted on 06/28/2008 7:17:28 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9882 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

9,884 posted on 06/28/2008 7:18:21 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9879 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

So do you or do you not deny that the Roman church was a corrupt political oligarchy at the time of The Reformation?


9,885 posted on 06/28/2008 7:18:31 PM PDT by gost2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9877 | View Replies]

To: gost2

Formulated the way you have, presuming you are referring to the Catholic Church, there’s no need to deny it. It’s false.


9,886 posted on 06/28/2008 7:22:43 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9885 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.


9,887 posted on 06/28/2008 7:23:43 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9827 | View Replies]

To: enat
Under the principle that there is no confidentiality or proprietary interest in the promise if it is made to a group including one who is not a recipient of the promise.

That doesn't sit too well with Acts 1:17 "For he was numbered with us, and had obtained part of this ministry."

There is no discrepancy.

Well gee, thanks for clearing that up. "I'm writing to you to watch out for those that can't harm you anyway" make sense now that you've explained it better....

Sorry, sounds like the "little children" he was writing to were actually church leaders to me. And as you can't disprove my understanding using Sola, you can't mandate yours, either.

9,888 posted on 06/28/2008 7:26:13 PM PDT by papertyger (Gun control laws make as much sense as giving condoms to a pregnant teen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9869 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

The insinuation that I lie like Goebbels is very personal.

Last time that one called me a liar, I was suspended for complaining about it.


9,889 posted on 06/28/2008 7:27:09 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9887 | View Replies]

To: Joya

ping to the post you were asking about.


9,890 posted on 06/28/2008 7:28:25 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9547 | View Replies]

To: papertyger; enat

Acts 1:17 is directly on point: “obtained part of this ministry.”


9,891 posted on 06/28/2008 7:28:39 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9888 | View Replies]

To: Joya

ping


9,892 posted on 06/28/2008 7:29:01 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9556 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
“Is the Biblical standard not “two or three witnesses?”

Neither of those two scriptures mention an institutional church or hierarchy, in fact, in the Matthew 18 passage the church Jesus describes is an informal (”where two or three are gathered together in my name there am I in the midst”) assembly.

“The same could be said for the doctrine of the Trinity”

Although “Trinity” is not stated the doctrine is explicit in the scriptures. The one, institutional, hierarchical church is not. There were many “churches” mentioned in the scriptures, some with elders, some with prophet-teachers, some democratic and some anarchical. some highly ritualistic and some just teaching churches. There was no central controlling body or person in the early churches as witness Paul’s problems in Corinth and in his letter to the Philippian church.

“This passage is silent on apostolic succession, as you well know”

I don't remember Apollos being an Apostle.

9,893 posted on 06/28/2008 7:29:10 PM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9877 | View Replies]

To: Joya

ping


9,894 posted on 06/28/2008 7:30:13 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9660 | View Replies]

To: Joya

ping


9,895 posted on 06/28/2008 7:31:22 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9677 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789; Joya

Please archive this one, too.


9,896 posted on 06/28/2008 7:32:22 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9701 | View Replies]

To: Joya

ping


9,897 posted on 06/28/2008 7:33:12 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9730 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Let me know if she’d like some heirloom tomato seeds. I’m quite willing to share some from each of 20 or more varieties.


9,898 posted on 06/28/2008 7:35:13 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9818 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Thanks tons. You are certainly welcome.

Not at all sure I do as you say. I just do what I can.

You hold your own in behalf of The Kingdom quite well, imho.


9,899 posted on 06/28/2008 7:36:46 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9844 | View Replies]

To: gost2
So do you or do you not deny that the Roman church was a corrupt political oligarchy at the time of The Reformation?

I deny the question has any more bearing on the rectitude of the reformers actions than David's anointing had on reign of Saul.

9,900 posted on 06/28/2008 7:42:54 PM PDT by papertyger (Gun control laws make as much sense as giving condoms to a pregnant teen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9885 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 9,861-9,8809,881-9,9009,901-9,920 ... 11,821-11,826 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson