The Worship of Mary? (An Observation)

[tiki]

Ouch!

[John Leland 1789]

Shudder indeed.

[OLD REGGIE]

Do you call that hate filled rant a prayer?

[Mad Dawg]

Have another beer, Reggie. I understand it's good for the joints.

Heck. Have another joint. Not sure it's good for the beer though.

I may be paranoid. But it is certain that some Protestants here post not to discuss but to upset and "drive nuts". Denial as a defense mechanism has its merits.

[Petronski]

You should indeed shudder at how the two of you can pat each other on the back for repeating a false statement about the Catholic Church.

[1000 silverlings]

Some Protestants here desire and intend ill for some Catholics here.

It's more wah, they hate me, it's a constant refrain. It's incredible really. I wonder how old they really are.

[netmilsmom]

>>Both, according to the RCC.<<

Ah, ah, ah! Bearing false witness?

[Quix]

LOL. Thanks.

[Petronski]

I wonder how old they really are.

Old enough to recognize the hate at work in constantly telling proud lies about the faith of another. That ain't love, and it sure ain't indifference.

[Mad Dawg]

Changing the subject aGAIN?

[Petronski]

You don’t need a question mark there.

[OLD REGGIE]

Hmm, how do you know it was a she?

I was struck with how empty the Church must have been.

[Quix]

LOL.

I think Mad Dawg is head and shoulders above me . . . he’s so methodical . . .

I shoot from the hip in a typically ramble all over the countryside fashion.

[John Leland 1789]

Actually, I want to take your word for it that the Co- stuff is not really a doctrine of the Catholic Church. There are many Catholics on FR and elsewhere who keep pushing the idea, though.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

You did not post it.

I posted #5 out of the six sections of the 25th chapter of the WCF because that section addressed the error being discussed which was that the RCC considers itself to be a "perfect" church.

It's not. Not by a looong shot.

I didn't post Sections 1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 because those sections were not addressing that topic.

If and when the topic becomes "Is the false bishop of Rome an antichrist," I'll be happy to make reference to the WCF.

You really appear concerned about the WCF since you seem to post it more often than I do. lol. As God wills. Keep reading it.

[Quix]

Thanks.

Will read it.

[netmilsmom]

>>“Mary, our subordinate Redemptrix.”
“Mary, our subsidiary Redemptrix.”
“Mary, our assistant Redemptrix.”
“Mary, our joint-Redemptrix.”<<

As a Christian, does it do you any good to perpetuate this lie? I can see when no one posted a link to a dictionary with the proper definition but since it has, these words are hateful and unwarranted.

[Judith Anne]

I had 20/900 in one eye (left, the good one) and 20/950 in the other. I was wearing contacts and glasses in order to see, and radial keratotomy was a miracle for me.

The doctor would only do one eye at a time, in case there was a complication I would still have some pitiful amount of useful vision.

This has beem a miracle for me. Now the only concern is, for a high myope like myself, the risk of sudden blindness from retinal detachment. So far, so good.

[1000 silverlings]

This was answered previously. If it was “with the Redeemer” the Latin would be “cum Redemptor”. It is not, and it is not Latin. It is some crazy made up english that doesn’t make sense, unless she is sharing some role with another goddess.

[papertyger]

I am regularly thankful that I am separated by geography and anonymity from some of the people here.

I was going to respond to this post with a cute little "I see you" graphic, so I googled "peekaboo" images...

...Big mistake ;o)