Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom; Dr. Eckleburg

This was answered previously. If it was “with the Redeemer” the Latin would be “cum Redemptor”. It is not, and it is not Latin. It is some crazy made up english that doesn’t make sense, unless she is sharing some role with another goddess.


2,679 posted on 06/05/2008 1:09:57 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2677 | View Replies ]


To: 1000 silverlings

>>It is some crazy made up english that doesn’t make sense, unless she is sharing some role with another goddess.<<

Co- is not crazy and made up. Look here

http://www.answers.com/topic/co-prefix?cat=health

Why do you think it’s made up?


2,685 posted on 06/05/2008 1:14:26 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Iron Mom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2679 | View Replies ]

To: 1000 silverlings
If it was “with the Redeemer” the Latin would be “cum Redemptor”. It is not...

According to whom?

...and it is not Latin.

Not anywhere?

2,688 posted on 06/05/2008 1:15:48 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2679 | View Replies ]

To: 1000 silverlings

>>If it was “with the Redeemer” the Latin would be “cum Redemptor”<<

And actually the Church doesn’t teach co-redeemer anyway so it’s a moot point.


2,690 posted on 06/05/2008 1:17:32 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Iron Mom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2679 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson