>>If it was “with the Redeemer” the Latin would be “cum Redemptor”<<
And actually the Church doesn’t teach co-redeemer anyway so it’s a moot point.
No it isn’t. There still exists the very squirrely and unrecognizable “co-Redemptrix” that is being called “with the Redeemer”
And actually the Church doesn’t teach co-redeemer anyway so it’s a moot point.
= = =
Not a moot point.
It seems that all the available evidence strongly indicates that it’s just a matter of time until the new dogma gains that status—given the sympathies from the Pope down.