Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: John Leland 1789; Mad Dawg

>>“Mary, our subordinate Redemptrix.”
“Mary, our subsidiary Redemptrix.”
“Mary, our assistant Redemptrix.”
“Mary, our joint-Redemptrix.”<<

As a Christian, does it do you any good to perpetuate this lie? I can see when no one posted a link to a dictionary with the proper definition but since it has, these words are hateful and unwarranted.


2,677 posted on 06/05/2008 1:07:11 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Iron Mom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2659 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom; Dr. Eckleburg

This was answered previously. If it was “with the Redeemer” the Latin would be “cum Redemptor”. It is not, and it is not Latin. It is some crazy made up english that doesn’t make sense, unless she is sharing some role with another goddess.


2,679 posted on 06/05/2008 1:09:57 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2677 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom; John Leland 1789

I don’t see nor feel a microgram of hate in those words.

Discomfort with a perspective, statement, words does not automatically equal hate.

I don’t discern any hate in John at all toward anyone except maybe the devil.


2,965 posted on 06/05/2008 8:18:35 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2677 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson