Skip to comments.
The Worship of Mary? (An Observation)
Posted on 05/30/2008 10:21:34 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
Some of you will remember my recent decision to become a Catholic. I suppose I should be surprised it ended getting derailed into a 'Catholic vs. Protestant' thread, but after going further into the Religion forum, I suppose it's par for the course.
There seems to be a bit of big issue concerning Mary. I wanted to share an observation of sorts.
Now...although I was formerly going by 'Sola Scriptura', my father was born and raised Catholic, so I do have some knowledge of Catholic doctrine (not enough, at any rate...so consider all observations thusly).
Mary as a 'co-redeemer', Mary as someone to intercede for us with regards to our Lord Jesus.
Now...I can definitely see how this would raise some hairs. After all, Jesus Himself said that He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and that none come to the Father but through Him. I completely agree.
I do notice a bit of a fundamental difference in perception though. Call it a conflict of POV. Do Catholics worship Mary (as I've seen a number of Protestants proclaim), or do they rather respect and venerate her (as I've seen Catholics claim)? Note that it's one thing to regard someone with reverence; I revere President Bush as the noted leader of the free world. I revere my father. I revere Dr. O'Neil, a humorous and brilliant math teacher at my university. It's an act of respect.
But do I WORSHIP them?
No. Big difference between respecting/revering and worshiping. At least, that's how I view it.
I suppose it's also a foible to ask Mary to pray for us, on our behalf...but don't we tend to also ask other people to pray for us? Doesn't President Bush ask for people to pray for him? Don't we ask our family members to pray for us for protection while on a trip? I don't see quite a big disconnect between that and asking Mary to help pray for our wellbeing.
There is some question to the fact that she is physically dead. Though it stands to consider that she is still alive, in Heaven. Is it not common practice to not just regard our physical life, but to regard most of all our spirit, our soul? That which survives the flesh before ascending to Heaven or descending to Hell after God's judgment?
I don't think it's that big of a deal. I could change my mind after reading more in-depth, but I don't think that the Catholic Church has decreed via papal infallibility that Mary is to be placed on a higher pedestal than Jesus, or even to be His equal.
Do I think she is someone to be revered and respected? Certainly. She is the mother of Jesus, who knew Him for His entire life as a human on Earth. Given that He respected her (for He came to fulfill the old laws; including 'Honor Thy Father and Mother'), I don't think it's unnatural for other humans to do the same. I think it's somewhat presumptuous to regard it on the same level as idolatry or supplanting Jesus with another.
In a way, I guess the way Catholics treat Mary and the saints is similar to how the masses treated the Apostles following the Resurrection and Jesus's Ascension: people who are considered holy in that they have a deep connection with Jesus and His Word, His Teachings, His Message. As the Apostles spread the Good News and are remembered and revered to this day for their work, so to are the works of those sainted remembered and revered. Likewise with Mary. Are the Apostles worshiped? No. That's how it holds with Mary and the saints.
At least, that's how my initial thoughts on the subject are. I'll have to do more reading.
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; mary; rcc; romancatholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 11,041-11,060, 11,061-11,080, 11,081-11,100 ... 11,821-11,826 next last
To: Forest Keeper
Perverse DENIAL
of Biblical Truths
does NOT alter nor remove The Truths.
Great post. Thx.
11,061
posted on
07/03/2008 4:38:55 AM PDT
by
Quix
(WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
To: Forest Keeper
INDEED.
Yet some would have us believe that a bunch of power mongering politicians meeting in Committee know better than John.
LOL.
GTTM
11,062
posted on
07/03/2008 4:40:28 AM PDT
by
Quix
(WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
To: Forest Keeper
You have failed. None of those individually or together amount to sola scriptura.
11,063
posted on
07/03/2008 5:42:32 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: Quix
They know what we mean. It has been spelled out 100s of times over.Yes indeed, you are very right.
11,064
posted on
07/03/2008 5:54:34 AM PDT
by
Forest Keeper
(It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
There never appears to be much substance in your posts. Just a lot of "oh, yeah???"Oh, yeah? I've seen you make that claim with other posters. I've explained your role in that before.
To: MarkBsnr
You have expressed some anti Catholic thoughts in the past. Id have to pass, but thank you for your kind off.
With an attitude like that you'd not be suitable as Jesuit candidate in any event.
11,066
posted on
07/03/2008 7:39:56 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: MarkBsnr
You have expressed some anti Catholic thoughts in the past. Id have to pass, but thank you for your kind off.
With an attitude like that you'd not be suitable as Jesuit candidate in any event.
11,067
posted on
07/03/2008 7:39:56 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: Forest Keeper
Excellent point. I didn't even think of that. :) Thank you, I suspect you are just being gracious.
BTW, I've been enjoying your posts. You have much greater patience than I when encountering such fierce obstinacy.
11,068
posted on
07/03/2008 7:42:24 AM PDT
by
wmfights
(Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
To: wagglebee; Marysecretary; Dr. Eckleburg
Thats not the point, Dr. E. and others want to say that the Assumption didnt exist for 1800 years. This was demonstrated to be false.
Wrong! NEVER existed!
11,069
posted on
07/03/2008 7:45:53 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: MarkBsnr
I am gratified that you understand the difference between belief and knowing. It is not sufficient, yet it is better than the nothing that you claim to know.
Once again you make no sense. Keep up the good work.
Do you think there is a perfect translation of the Bible?
If so, which one?
11,070
posted on
07/03/2008 8:20:08 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: OLD REGGIE
11,071
posted on
07/03/2008 8:21:19 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: Petronski
Youre claiming youre a Jesuit?
If I told you I'd have to kill you.
11,072
posted on
07/03/2008 8:23:02 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: raygun; MarkBsnr; Dr. Eckleburg
11,073
posted on
07/03/2008 8:38:34 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: raygun; MarkBsnr; Dr. Eckleburg
11,074
posted on
07/03/2008 8:38:35 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: MarkBsnr; raygun
Thank you for this wonderful post.
The contradictions are explicit; the lies are exposed and the illogic is highlighted. It is not a matter of logic and reason and Scripture. It is a matter of pride and hubris and personal advancement.
Jesus came for all men - the crime of Calvinisim is that they deny that and therefore crush the hopes of men to be saved by God. Only the elite get saved; screw all the rest.
Too bad it's not original.
UNAM SANCTAM
11,075
posted on
07/03/2008 8:42:46 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: OLD REGGIE
INDEED
. . . according to the solid evidence.
. . . according to the rubber histories . . . anything goes.
11,076
posted on
07/03/2008 8:52:51 AM PDT
by
Quix
(WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
To: Petronski; Forest Keeper
You have failed. None of those individually or together amount to sola scriptura.
OK, you've answered to your typical one-line zinger. Now - to your "Mary" proof.
11,077
posted on
07/03/2008 8:56:20 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: Petronski
Your post is false.
Proof?
11,078
posted on
07/03/2008 8:59:33 AM PDT
by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: OLD REGGIE
11,079
posted on
07/03/2008 9:16:01 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: OLD REGGIE
Now - to your "Mary" proof. Where did you get the idea I was providing that?
That would be the act of a sola scripturist. Tagline ↓↓↓
11,080
posted on
07/03/2008 9:18:54 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 11,041-11,060, 11,061-11,080, 11,081-11,100 ... 11,821-11,826 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson