Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Worship of Mary? (An Observation)

Posted on 05/30/2008 10:21:34 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

Some of you will remember my recent decision to become a Catholic. I suppose I should be surprised it ended getting derailed into a 'Catholic vs. Protestant' thread, but after going further into the Religion forum, I suppose it's par for the course.

There seems to be a bit of big issue concerning Mary. I wanted to share an observation of sorts.

Now...although I was formerly going by 'Sola Scriptura', my father was born and raised Catholic, so I do have some knowledge of Catholic doctrine (not enough, at any rate...so consider all observations thusly).

Mary as a 'co-redeemer', Mary as someone to intercede for us with regards to our Lord Jesus.

Now...I can definitely see how this would raise some hairs. After all, Jesus Himself said that He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and that none come to the Father but through Him. I completely agree.

I do notice a bit of a fundamental difference in perception though. Call it a conflict of POV. Do Catholics worship Mary (as I've seen a number of Protestants proclaim), or do they rather respect and venerate her (as I've seen Catholics claim)? Note that it's one thing to regard someone with reverence; I revere President Bush as the noted leader of the free world. I revere my father. I revere Dr. O'Neil, a humorous and brilliant math teacher at my university. It's an act of respect.

But do I WORSHIP them?

No. Big difference between respecting/revering and worshiping. At least, that's how I view it.

I suppose it's also a foible to ask Mary to pray for us, on our behalf...but don't we tend to also ask other people to pray for us? Doesn't President Bush ask for people to pray for him? Don't we ask our family members to pray for us for protection while on a trip? I don't see quite a big disconnect between that and asking Mary to help pray for our wellbeing.

There is some question to the fact that she is physically dead. Though it stands to consider that she is still alive, in Heaven. Is it not common practice to not just regard our physical life, but to regard most of all our spirit, our soul? That which survives the flesh before ascending to Heaven or descending to Hell after God's judgment?

I don't think it's that big of a deal. I could change my mind after reading more in-depth, but I don't think that the Catholic Church has decreed via papal infallibility that Mary is to be placed on a higher pedestal than Jesus, or even to be His equal.

Do I think she is someone to be revered and respected? Certainly. She is the mother of Jesus, who knew Him for His entire life as a human on Earth. Given that He respected her (for He came to fulfill the old laws; including 'Honor Thy Father and Mother'), I don't think it's unnatural for other humans to do the same. I think it's somewhat presumptuous to regard it on the same level as idolatry or supplanting Jesus with another.

In a way, I guess the way Catholics treat Mary and the saints is similar to how the masses treated the Apostles following the Resurrection and Jesus's Ascension: people who are considered holy in that they have a deep connection with Jesus and His Word, His Teachings, His Message. As the Apostles spread the Good News and are remembered and revered to this day for their work, so to are the works of those sainted remembered and revered. Likewise with Mary. Are the Apostles worshiped? No. That's how it holds with Mary and the saints.

At least, that's how my initial thoughts on the subject are. I'll have to do more reading.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; mary; rcc; romancatholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,421-10,44010,441-10,46010,461-10,480 ... 11,821-11,826 next last
To: wagglebee; Dr. Eckleburg

“Whether you like it or not, members of the PCUSA consider themselves, and are generally considered to be, Calvinists”

And Dignity and Catholics for a Free Choice consider themselves Catholics. What is your point?.

Dr. Eckleburg; forgive me for breaking my promise, please.


10,441 posted on 06/30/2008 2:10:56 PM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10434 | View Replies]

To: enat
...Dignity and Catholics for a Free Choice...

Nice comparison to PCUSA.

10,442 posted on 06/30/2008 2:13:51 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10441 | View Replies]

To: tiki; Dr. Eckleburg
Esau thrived and that is obvious from the Bible but 2 little verses, taken out of context are used to prove that there are elect and non-elect.

.Are you serious?

10,443 posted on 06/30/2008 2:14:43 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10361 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’ve got an idea. Ordain CLOSETED homosexuals, so many it represents a large number of your clergy, and PRETEND you don’t.


10,444 posted on 06/30/2008 2:16:30 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10426 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE

“I am certain you will chase down the “Catholics” who followed enat around”

I appreciate your covering my back here. This is really no problem. In my profession when one has to resort to questioning academic credentials one has no real defense to the argument. I consider it a compliment.


10,445 posted on 06/30/2008 2:17:37 PM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10386 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
One of them went so far as to post a link to a phony Diploma Mill with the slightly disguised charge concerning enat's credentials.

Truly? Because this is harrassment

10,446 posted on 06/30/2008 2:19:45 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10386 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“Nice comparison to PCUSA”

You like that? They are about on the same moral level now.


10,447 posted on 06/30/2008 2:19:51 PM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10442 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Dr. Eckleburg; OLD REGGIE
It’s clear where Esau belongs, except perhaps to some protestants.

where does he belong?

10,448 posted on 06/30/2008 2:25:00 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10355 | View Replies]

To: enat
They are about on the same moral level now.

No, not really.

Catholics for Free Choice promote killing of innocents. That's far worse than any thing PCUSA or Dignity could do. Murder trumps all.

10,449 posted on 06/30/2008 2:25:51 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10447 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; PAR35; irishtenor; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; RnMomof7; RochesterFan; ..
Whether you like it or not, members of the PCUSA consider themselves, and are generally considered to be, Calvinists.

Whether you like it or not, members of the PCUSA consider themselves, and are generally considered to be, Calvinists.

The PCUSA does not regard itself as a Calvinist denominiation. I was a member of the PCUSA. Very few of the Presbyterians in that denomination have even read Calvin. Sadly, by this recent vote permitting the ordination of practicing homosexuals, contrary to the will of vast numbers of members in the denomination, the PCUSA has further removed itself from much of Scripture and the theology Calvin articulated and taught.

Neither the PCA nor the OPC capitulates on the Gospel and its teachings concerning homosexuality. Such modernism was part of what caused the denomination to splinter in the first place.

But by the grace of God, the remnant survives, regardless of men's ignorance and schemes.

And by this act the membership rolls of the PCA and the OPC will undoubtedly grow.

10,450 posted on 06/30/2008 2:27:53 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10434 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Not only is it not part of Catholic teaching, it is prohibited.

Legislators have a Code of Ethics. Legislators lie, cheat, and steal.

Police have a Code of Ethics. Police lie, cheat, and steal.

Lawyers have a Code of Ethics. Lawyers lie, cheat, and steal.

The Catholic Church doesn't teach the worship of Mary. Catholics do.

Eliminate the "Catholics" who violate "Catholic Teaching" and you have a tiny minority religion.

Your "Catholic Teaching" ploy is meaningless.

10,451 posted on 06/30/2008 2:29:45 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10440 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings; tiki; Dr. Eckleburg

“Esau thrived and that is obvious from the Bible but 2 little verses, taken out of context are used to prove that there are elect and non-elect”

David had the same problem thinking prosperity is a sign of God’s favor.

Psa 73:12 Behold, these [are] the ungodly, who prosper in the world; they increase [in] riches.

Psa 73:13 Verily I have cleansed my heart [in] vain, and washed my hands in innocency.

Psa 73:14 For all the day long have I been plagued, and chastened every morning.

Psa 73:15 If I say, I will speak thus; behold, I should offend [against] the generation of thy children.

Psa 73:16 When I thought to know this, it [was] too painful for me;

Psa 73:17 Until I went into the sanctuary of God; [then] understood I their end.

Dr. Eckleburg: I just got absolution from a lawyer for my church.


10,452 posted on 06/30/2008 2:30:10 PM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10443 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
You're changing the subject.

Following your debate technique...

No, I'm not.

10,453 posted on 06/30/2008 2:30:39 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10437 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

***Does God know who will receive faith in Christ, and who will not, and yet does God create both those categories of men anyway?***

A step up, for sure. Keep trying, you’re almost there.


10,454 posted on 06/30/2008 2:31:15 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10382 | View Replies]

To: Quix
[KISSING THE FOOT OF A STATUE OF A MAN! What part of this escapes you guys?]

ANSWER:
Virtually ALL of it! GOD--PLEASE Have Mercy !!!

So it would seem. None are so blind, and all that...

10,455 posted on 06/30/2008 2:31:41 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10173 | View Replies]

To: enat
Only if you say 27 Hail Marys and promise to floss.

8~)

10,456 posted on 06/30/2008 2:32:26 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10441 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings
They seem to have been "serious" about this for days.

It's almost like once they have an opinion, NOTHING is going to change that opinion, not even the truth.

10,457 posted on 06/30/2008 2:33:57 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10443 | View Replies]

To: enat
I appreciate your covering my back here. This is really no problem. In my profession when one has to resort to questioning academic credentials one has no real defense to the argument. I consider it a compliment.

I understand. Frankly though, I was emphasizing the double standard shown here by many and used the "harrassment" of you as an example.
10,458 posted on 06/30/2008 2:36:11 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10445 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
I've got an idea. Ordain CLOSETED homosexuals, so many it represents a large number of your clergy, and PRETEND you don't.

LOL.

And then when they're faced with evidence of the sexual abuse of minors in their congregation, shuffle these men around to other unsuspecting parishes so they can continue their abuse with impunity.

10,459 posted on 06/30/2008 2:37:05 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10444 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE

I recognize that but just wanted to say I appreciated your concern.


10,460 posted on 06/30/2008 2:37:43 PM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10458 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,421-10,44010,441-10,46010,461-10,480 ... 11,821-11,826 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson