Yes amen Dr. (Boy, talk about mangling the verses and the plain meaning...especially the verse that every Christian proclaims.) It seems that Chip and others now want to claim we are the anti-Christ, because we believe the plain truth of scripture
NO.
Another Falsehood.
I essentially asserted that the Replacementarian perspective shared a lot in common with the Communist and globalist perspectives as I’d experienced and studied them.
I noted the points I thought were in common and hypothesized that CONTROL was a common feature.
However, if someone wants to wear a shoe that fits . . . I believe in feet being comfortable.
My belief is
that such globalist communist forces
HAVE
used such perspectives in the past;
ARE
using such perspectives now;
AND WILL USE
such perspectives increasingly in coming years
to the destructiveness of individuals and of authentic Christians as much as God allows.
“It seems that Chip and others now want to claim we are the anti-Christ, because we believe the plain truth of scripture.”
Consider the source. I’ve read his posts and I’m not surprised he’d come up with that one eventually.
So believing that Jesus came in 70 AD, although not in the flesh, but in some other sense, is "the plain truth of scripture"??? Is that what you are confessing here??? that Jesus did have a coming after his physical coming, but not like his physical coming. This other coming was ethereal, not physical, not in the flesh.
Well John's epistle is also the plain truth of scripture and he calls your preteristic Gnosticism just exactly what it is. Your problem is not with me but with the "plain truth of scripture".
And BTW, I remember just a few posts back your denying that you know what a Preterist believes and now you are including yourself squarely in the camp of Preterism. What happened??? did you find a few more petals on that dandelion of yours: "I'm a preterist.. I'm a preterist not .. I'm a preterist ..." If the flower fits, wear it.