Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Mormon Brothers?
Reformed Evangelist ^ | May 14th, 2007 | Jeff Fuller

Posted on 07/05/2007 3:00:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

Mormon Evangelists

The following draws from the book Is the Mormon My Brother by apologist James White. Earlier this year, Paul Kaiser reprinted a Worldview article titled 10 Mormonism Facts which generated a myriad of responses from visitors who stated that Mormons were being misrepresented and are simply our brothers & sisters in the Body of Christ. Let’s look at what Dr. White presents using LDS resources:

The First Vision

Without question the key revelation in Mormon Scripture regarding the nature of God is to be found in what is known as the First Vision of Joseph Smith. The vision itself is fundamental to all of LDS theology. Mormon Apostle Bruce R. McConkie described the vision:

That glorious theophany which took place in the spring of 1820 and which marked the opening of the dispensation of the fullness of times is called the First Vision. It is rated as first both from the standpoint of time and of pre-eminent importance. In it Joseph Smith saw and conversed with the Father and the Son, both of which exalted personages were personally present before him as he lay enwrapped in the Spirit and overshadowed by the Holy Ghost.

This transcendent vision was the beginning of latter day revelation; it marked the opening of the heavens after the long night of apostate darkness; with it was ushered in the great era of restoration, the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. (Acts 3:21.) Through it the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens, and because of it the truth about those Beings whom it is life eternal to know began again to be taught among men. (John 17:3.) With this vision came the call of that Prophet who, save Jesus only, was destined to do more for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived in it. (D. & C. 135:3.) This vision was the most important event that had taken place in all world history from the day of Christ’s ministry to the glorious hour when it occurred.(1)

And Mormon Prophet Ezra Taft Benson said,

Joseph Smith, a prophet of God, restored the knowledge of God. Joseph’s first vision clearly revealed that the Father and Son are separate personages, having bodies as tangible as mans. Later it was also revealed that the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit, separate and distinct from the personalities of the Father and the Son. (See D&C 130:22.) This all-important truth shocked the world even though sustained by the Bible. (2)

How is it that the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens and the knowledge of God was restored by this one vision? While the story is as familiar to Mormons as John 3:16 is to Christians, we present Joseph Smith’s own recounting of the story in full, taken from the LDS Scriptures (and hence carrying canonical authority). However, we note that the account that appears in the LDS Scriptures was written in 1838, eighteen years after the events described:

14 So, in accordance with this, my determination to ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the morning of a beautiful, clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and twenty. It was the first time in my life that I had made such an attempt, for amidst all my anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt to pray vocally.

15 After I had retired to the place where I had previously designed to go, having looked around me, and finding myself alone, I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon bysome power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction.

16 But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being just at this moment of great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!

18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)–and which I should join.

19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong;(3) and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.

20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, Never mind, all is well I am well enough off. I then said to my mother, I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true. It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me, almost in my infancy? (Joseph Smith History 1:14-20).

What does this vision, recorded in LDS Scripture, teach concerning God? First and foremost, it presents to us the concept of a plurality of gods. This arises from the fact that God the Father is a separate and distinct physical entity from Jesus Christ, His Son. God the Father is possessed of a physical body, as is the Son. This is why McConkie can claim the creeds of Christendom were smashed to smithereens, for the vision has always been interpreted by the LDS leadership to teach that God the Father is a separate and distinct person and being from the Son. The unity of Being that is central to Christian theology is completely denied by Joseph Smith in the First Vision. Hence, you have one God, the Father, directing Smith to another God, the Son.

While it is not our intention to critique these teachings at this point, it should be noted that there are a number of problems with the First Vision, and with the entire development of the LDS concept of God as well. As we noted, this version of the First Vision was not written until 1838. Previous versions, however, differed in substantial details from this final and official account. Most significantly, the presence of both the Father and the Son as separate and distinct gods is not a part of the earlier accounts.(4)

————————————————-

(1) Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine,2nd ed., rev. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 284-285, LDSCL.

(2) Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988), p. 4, LDSCL. On page 101 of the same book, we read this strong statement:

The first vision of the Prophet Joseph Smith is bedrock theology to the Church. The adversary knows this and has attacked Joseph Smith’s credibility from the day he announced the visitation of the Father and the Son. You should always bear testimony to thetruth of the First Vision. Joseph Smith did see the Father and the Son. They conversed with him as he said they did. Any leader who, without reservation, cannot declare his testimony that God and Jesus Christ appeared to Joseph Smith can never be a true leader, a true shepherd. If we do not accept this truth if we have not received a witness about this great revelationwe cannot inspire faith in those whom we lead.

(3) One of Mormonism’s leading scholars, James Talmage (and a General Authority), said the following in the General Conference of April, 1920:

This Church, therefore, from its beginning, has been unique, for the organization of the Church was forecasted in this declaration that at the time of Joseph Smiths first vision there was no Church of Jesus Christ upon the earth; and I do not see why people should take issue with us for making that statement (CR1920Apr:103).

(4) I noted a number of the historical problems with Mormonism in Letters to a Mormon Elder, pp. 88-106. For a fuller treatment of this issue, see H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, Inventing Mormonism (Salt Lake: Smith Research Associates, 1994), pp.1-41, and Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? (Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1982), pp. 143-162.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: apologetics; boggsforgovernor; brothers; christianity; lds; mormon; mormonism; orthodoxy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,341 next last
To: topcat54; Logophile; Gamecock; Larry Lucido
I fail to see why any creed would be a prerequisite for being considered a Christian. All these creeds were determined by groups of humans trying to resolve theological questions.

I think a better starting point in defining who is a Christian would be those that follow Jesus, seeking to live a Christ like life, knowing Jesus is the son of God and through him alone salvation is found.

121 posted on 07/05/2007 7:13:07 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; topcat54; Logophile; Gamecock; Larry Lucido
"knowing Jesus is the son of God and through him alone salvation is found."

Correct. Let us now define "God." Upon what foundation will you build this temple?

Christians will tell you the Father is the same God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Mormons will tell you the Father was just some dude who got things right.

So, if the Father of Mormonism and Judeo-Christian are different, so is the Son.

Mormons do not believe in the Christian Christ.

122 posted on 07/05/2007 7:21:32 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Enosh; topcat54; Logophile; Gamecock; Larry Lucido
Let us now define "God."

Creator and ruler of the universe.

123 posted on 07/05/2007 7:28:35 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; topcat54; Logophile; Gamecock; Larry Lucido
"Creator and ruler of the universe."

Bingo! Thus He could never have been a mere man as He existed before mankind.

Thus... Mormonism is FALSE!

124 posted on 07/05/2007 7:35:24 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Enosh; topcat54; Logophile; Gamecock; Larry Lucido
Thus He could never have been a mere man as He existed before mankind.

No argument from me. We exist at his pleasure.

I was unaware that Mormons believed God "evolved" from being a mere man.

125 posted on 07/05/2007 7:40:24 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
I think a better starting point in defining who is a Christian would be those that follow Jesus, seeking to live a Christ like life, knowing Jesus is the son of God and through him alone salvation is found.

Sounds good to me. I wish the Creedians could figure that out.

126 posted on 07/05/2007 7:42:13 PM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Enosh; restornu; Flo Nightengale

***When has this ever happened to anyone?***
***Ruy here apparently thinks that a caste system exists within America.***

During the 1880’s this handshake was standard for the “common” people. Only the Elete got the full handshake.

One man in in the church of england got the two finger handshake and was so angered he went, joined and became a leader the English-Irish version of the restorationist movement (totally separate from the American version).

Hill’s Manual of Social and Business Forms by Thomas E. Hill (1881) clearly shows the two finger handshake.


127 posted on 07/05/2007 7:42:29 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I wish the Creedians could figure that out.

But how about the non-creedians who seek to move beyond Scripture?

128 posted on 07/05/2007 7:47:33 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar; restornu; Flo Nightengale; All
"(1881)"

*Blink*

Anyone else find this funny?

129 posted on 07/05/2007 7:49:11 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691

AzaleaCity5691: “If you knew anything about the Catholic Church, you would know that we don’t deify Mary.”

Perhaps I am mistaken, but I have seen numerous defenders of the RC church on these threads claiming Mary was without sin. This is an attribute only God can claim.

Members of the Catholic faith regularly pray to Mary. Why would they pray to someone who has no power to answer?


130 posted on 07/05/2007 7:50:48 PM PDT by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
But how about the non-creedians who seek to move beyond Scripture?

The creeds don't move beyond scripture?! I beg to differ.

131 posted on 07/05/2007 7:52:08 PM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691
Hmm. Very interesting.
The South comprises many states which had little to no Roman Catholic presence. Virginia, North and South Carolina , Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee come to mind.
Florida and Louisiana would be the only two which were in any way influenced by Roman Catholicism, and those were a non English speaking (Spanish and French, respectively) origin. The colonial period was not (outside of Maryland) much influenced by Roman Catholicism. In fact, I believe only one signer ( Carroll) was a member of that church.
132 posted on 07/05/2007 7:53:03 PM PDT by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Enosh

Sometime you come off as a
Royal Ring a Ding Ding!

133 posted on 07/05/2007 7:54:35 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: visually_augmented; AzaleaCity5691
"Why would they pray to someone who has no power to answer?"

The correct question is, "Why pray to someone other than God?"

We know that sometimes Angels act, so insulting them isn't a very good idea. Doubly so for Jesus' mother.

134 posted on 07/05/2007 8:00:05 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
But how about the non-creedians who seek to move beyond Scripture?

If I'm incorrect I'm sure you will cite the Scripture that shows it. From what I've seen so far Mormons believe Mary is the on going "mistress" of God and produces "spirit babies" for God in heaven. Also, Mormons believe individual believers will evolve into "Gods" themselves. Lastly, Mormons apparently believe that God "evolved" from man in the first place. I don't believe any of these assertions are Scriptural.

135 posted on 07/05/2007 8:03:44 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
I believe it is stated as:
“God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man...and you have got to learn to be gods yourself.”
Journal of discourses 6:3-4 (Joseph Smith)

Now this doesn't sound too good. So the church is finessing it, and revising and developing and denying it and the verbal gymnastics required are absurd. But if you do some basic research you cannot avoid the fact that this is a foundational belief of the LDS church. And so no, they are not Christian.

136 posted on 07/05/2007 8:05:09 PM PDT by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Thanks, Resty. I know you're nice from that yanked thread I got in trouble over.

So, if the Father was once a man, how did He create the universe which existed before man?

(The Creation bit is in the Bible, BTW...)

137 posted on 07/05/2007 8:07:40 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Enosh; restornu; Flo Nightengale; All

Low Church.
***The terms actually came about in the Anglican church in the 16th & 17th centuries***

“(1881)”
*Blink*

***Anyone else find this funny?***

Perhapis I should have ended each post with the words SARCASM /OFF.

Low church. Two finger handshake. leaving church feeling very LOW. Must one PAINT A PICTURE FOR YOU?
Sheesh.


138 posted on 07/05/2007 8:09:25 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Comment #139 Removed by Moderator

To: Bainbridge
“God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man...and you have got to learn to be gods yourself.” Journal of discourses 6:3-4 (Joseph Smith)

Thank you for the notation. I know you won't find anything alluding to this in Scripture.

Gen. 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

God preexisted everything. God could not be the product of evolution. God existed before anything began.

140 posted on 07/05/2007 8:12:52 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 1,341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson