Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Sloth

Yes: "2 It behoveth therefore a bishop to be blameless, the husband of one wife, sober, prudent, of good behaviour, chaste, given to hospitality, a teacher, 3 Not given to wine, no striker, but modest, not quarrelsome, not covetous, but 4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all chastity. 5 But if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?

2 "Of one wife"... The meaning is not that every bishop should have a wife (for St. Paul himself had none), but that no one should be admitted to the holy orders of bishop, priest, or deacon, who had been married more than once. "


33 posted on 02/23/2007 10:03:41 AM PST by fogofbobegabay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: fogofbobegabay
(for St. Paul himself had none)

True, but I see no biblical evidence that Paul was a bishop. And your interpretation seems to fly in the face of verse 5, that suggests that one is unqualified to be a bishop unless he's demonstrated the ability to control his own kids.

43 posted on 02/23/2007 10:54:02 AM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: fogofbobegabay

Wrong. Literally, the text says "one woman man" - it does not have anything to do with how many wives...it talks about commitment to the wife of the presbuteros.


79 posted on 02/23/2007 9:03:31 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson