Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peril in Paradise: Why Young-earthers Emotional "No Death Before Adam" is just that: Emotion
http://www.reasons.org/resources/connections/200510_connections_q4/index.shtml#peril_in_paradise_theology_science_and_the_age_of_the_earth ^

Posted on 11/18/2005 6:02:24 AM PST by truthfinder9

Peril in Paradise: Theology, Science and the Age of the Earth

by Mark Whorton, Ph.D. Waynesboro, GA: Authentic Media, 2005. 256 pages. Paperback.

Reviewed by Krista Bontrager, MA., M.A.

Any old-earth creationist who has ever locked horns with a Christian friend about the age of the earth knows that there is far more to the debate than simply interpreting Genesis 1. The discussion inevitably shifts to a debate about how to understand Genesis 3. How has Adam's sin affected the creation?

NASA scientist, Mark Whorton, shrinks the divide separating young-earth creationists from old-earth creationists down to two words. Everything hinges on the question, what did God mean when He called the creation "very good"?

The real strength of Peril in Paradise is that Whorton approaches a classic debate from a different angle. Genesis 1 is nowhere in view. Rather, Whorton asserts that the discussion about the age of Earth is intertwined with a debate about the similarities and differences between Eden and the new heavens and Earth.

Whorton identifies two vastly different paradigms for understanding creation-the perfect paradise paradigm (used by young-earth creationists) and the perfect purpose paradigm (used by old-earth creationists). Advocates of the perfect paradise model believe God's pronouncement that the pre-fall creation was "very good" indicated that Eden was the best of all possible worlds. It was absolute perfection, a kind of "heaven on Earth." And although humans have ruined this paradise through sin, God will restore the earth to its Edenic state.

The perfect purpose paradigm, by contrast, asserts that the chief purpose of creation is to glorify God, who causes even wicked beings to testify to His glory. This universe is but one part of God's overall plan of creation and redemption.

Beckoning from the background, however, is the realization that what Whorton is really arguing concerns the nature of God's sovereignty over creation. Did He have to implement Plan B-the cross-after creation was spoiled by Adam's sin? Or, was it all part of His master plan?

Whorton tackles this theological powder keg with a surprising depth of knowledge of Scripture and the history of theology, despite the fact that these disciplines rest outside the realm of his formal education. He places himself squarely within classical Protestant theology, quoting from John Calvin and the Westminster Confession, in order to build his case.

But Peril in Paradise is far from a rehash of time-worn arguments. Whorton tills new ground in the age of the earth debate by helping readers to reflect more deeply about what the Bible means when it describes Eden. And the book's release is timely, given the increasing charges of heresy coming out of certain creationist organizations, including the young-earth concern that animal death before Adam's fall undermines the atonement of Christ. They reason that human sin introduced death to God's creation, necessitating the Savior's redemptive work. Therefore, predation (death and bloodshed of animals) could not have been part of a "very good" creation prior to human sin. Whorton demonstrates why such thinking is biblically unfounded.

Whorton's case could have been made even more powerful with better organization of his material. At times it is hard to track how the points of each chapter fit together to form a cohesive whole. I found myself on more than one occasion flipping back to re-read the chapter title, asking, what is he arguing here again?

And there isn't a lot of literary drama to keep the reader motivated to turn the page. It lacks a certain, so what? or what difference does all this make? factor. Peril in Paradise is a straightforward information-driven approach that will largely appeal to those Christians already interested in the topic.

That's the major limitation of Whorton's book. It's not written at a popular level, but it's not exactly an academic treatment of the topic either. It seems to be a book in search of an audience. Whorton could have infused the book with more popular appeal, which I think is the readership he hopes to reach.

For this reason I would not be inclined to pass this book on to a young-earth friend, unless he or she was already well versed on the controversy. It might, however, be a good resource to provide a pastor or church leader, especially one who has expressed concern about the death-before-the-Fall issue.

But most importantly, Peril in Paradise will equip the old-earth creationist with powerful biblical and theological reasons for why animal death before Adam need not be a point of confusion or embarrassment, but rather an integral part of God's eternal plan.




TOPICS: Apologetics; Ministry/Outreach; Religion & Science; Theology
KEYWORDS: creationists; religion; science; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: PetroniusMaximus

[So where in your "old-earth" Bible does it give you permission to be rude to a fellow believer??? ]

I probably could say I'm also returning the favor since you talk to people like a kid. You brought this out of the realm of adult discussion. Maybe you're just used to dealing with Darwin Fundies.

And by the way, old-age isn't "metaphorical," its the literal translation. Put away the Ken Ham talking points.


41 posted on 11/21/2005 8:28:53 PM PST by truthfinder9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
"Your childish responses reveal your intellect on this subject."

Comparing my intellect to that of a child is an insult to all children! You owe them an apology!



"All of these verses refer to time periods other than 24 hour days."

Hey, the verse says "The next day Moses sat down to judge the people, and they stood around Moses from morning until evening" - FROM morning TILL evening - not 24 hrs!



"But you can't grasp that because, as a fundamentalist, you already have the answers."

I am not a fundamentalist! I am an intellectual Hotentot!!! But I love the fundies and I'll hang with them.



"And you wonder why I have to be stern with you. It's like talking to a kid. "

Come on! Your getting silly on me!!! Here's a plan of attack for you - try using an argument that makes some FREAKING SENSE and isn't just obviously poor isogesis.



"Let's see here, you admit that this is an example of "mornings and evenings"

Because it's a reference to 6,000+ mornings and evenings! Morning and evening are used as the MINOR UNITS to describe a long period of time - Six years and 100 days!!!! He's using mornings and evenings to be PRECISE - not to give some hazy reference to an indeterminately long period.


"Young-earthism is nothing more than a superficial, non-literal interpretation that is contradictory and ignores context."

Just for fun, show me how belief in a literal, six day creation contradicts the Scripture.




"With logic like yours above, no wonder Darwin Fundies use it to claim Christianity is false. "

Naw, I think they would stumble pretty hard over the RISING FROM THE DEAD stuff, friend! You need to learn who your friends are.
42 posted on 11/21/2005 8:47:27 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson