Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bible Question
September 16, 2004 | Gypsy286

Posted on 09/16/2005 5:25:50 PM PDT by GYPSY286

I'll be the first to admit that I have not read the Bible from start to finish but I do remember reading a scripture that - I'm paraphrasing here - that whoever takes away from what is written here will be turned away from God and whoever adds to what is written will be turned away from God. Can someone more knowledgeable tell me where I can find it? Any help would be deeply appreciated!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: GYPSY286

Interesting question....I always thought what was meant there was that we are to not change the words around to make them say what we want them to say. Leave them alone. But in different versions of the Bible, to stay exact in the meaning of the verses. IMO


21 posted on 09/16/2005 5:41:27 PM PDT by queenkathy (Dear God, I have a problem; it's me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GYPSY286
Would the Book of Mormon be considered as "adding" to the Words of the Bible?

If Mormons consider the Book of Mormon to be a direct word from God's mouth to Mr. Smith's ear...then, "yes." The Book of Mormon is NOT Scripture.

22 posted on 09/16/2005 5:42:50 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: madison10
The LDS considers the Book of Mormon to be the words of Gods prophets (parts of the twelve tribes who had been seperated) who lived long ago on the American continent in the new wolrd. They testified of Christ and His coming in Palestine, just as the Bible is God's word in the Old Word to His prophets there and is His witness for Christ.

As such, the Book of Mormon is considered to go hand in hand with the BIble in testifying of Christ. That is its purpose. "In the mouths of two or more witnesses."

That is how the LDS faith views the Book of Mormon, believing that both are scripture.

Not looking for contention, just explaining the faith.

23 posted on 09/16/2005 5:49:54 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Okay, thanks.


24 posted on 09/16/2005 5:52:49 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: madison10

You are welcome...and than you.


25 posted on 09/16/2005 5:58:39 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GYPSY286
Everyone seems to be looking at the curses upon those who add to or take away from the prophecies in Revelation. I'd suggest it is just as important to look at the promises of blessings to those who read and keep the things that are written in that book:

(Rev 1:3) Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand.

The promise is there. Read it, hear it, keep it. You will be blessed.

26 posted on 09/16/2005 6:09:50 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Amen...seek the blessing!


27 posted on 09/16/2005 7:26:34 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
We do have differences in theology, but realtively speaking, next to the saving atonement of Jesus Christ ad Him crucified, they are minor.

Really? Altering God's nature is "minor"? It's blasphemy.
28 posted on 09/16/2005 7:29:39 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Wouldn't it be both verses 18 and 19?
18 I warn everyone who hears the prophetic words in this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book,
 
19 and if anyone takes away from the words in this prophetic book, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city described in this book.

29 posted on 09/16/2005 7:39:58 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
Like I said, I will not get into contention.

I worship God the Father as my eternal Father, Jesus Christ, His Son (whome He said He was) as my personal Savior, and the Holy Ghost, who witnesses of Jesus Christ even as he did when Christ was baptised.

The essential element and issue is that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, atoned for our sins and through Him, and Him alone, can mankind be saved.

God's best to you and yours.

30 posted on 09/16/2005 7:43:18 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

I think someone should make a movie about Daniel. And I mean a fancy high-dollar Hollywood version, like The Passion.


31 posted on 09/16/2005 8:11:53 PM PDT by SerpentDove (Sen. Landrieu on the flooded buses: "This administration doesn't believe in mass transit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GYPSY286; sanewbie

Let us all remember that the "book" being referenced is not a book at all but a scroll. The Greek word for scroll, biblion, is sometimes translated as, book. Additionally, the curse and blessing are applied only to the "scroll" of Revelation. The New Testament, as such did not exist, although many of its parts did. The Old Testament had not been codified definitively, either. Certainly, the Bible, a single codified book with a fixed table of contents did not exist either for Christians or Jews. Therefore, to apply the curse or the blessing to the Bible as we know it today would be a stretch.


32 posted on 09/16/2005 11:01:16 PM PDT by sanormal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GYPSY286

Galatians 1:8


33 posted on 09/17/2005 12:35:40 AM PDT by kublia khan (absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

Thanks for the link!


34 posted on 09/17/2005 12:39:18 AM PDT by endthematrix (JOHN ROBERTS vs JOE BIDEN ................... ROBERTS wins TKO in second round!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kublia khan

Galatians 1:8 (New International Version)

8But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!
35 posted on 09/17/2005 8:20:44 AM PDT by gscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GYPSY286
Thank you so much. Would the Book of Mormon be considered as "adding" to the Words of the Bible?

The problem is, Mormons can point out it only applies to Revelation. And since it does, there's no real rebuttle.

You're better off using the resources like the ones here.

36 posted on 09/17/2005 10:02:50 AM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GYPSY286; A.J.Armitage
You're better off using the resources like the ones here.

If you want to know what "Mormons" really believe (and not just what anti-Mormons say about us), you are better off using the resources here.

37 posted on 09/17/2005 5:55:43 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile

That's a misdirection to get people to avoid looking at (usually accurate) information about what Mormons don't want you to hear until you're in it deep enough you'll just swallow it, like God the Father being a former mere man who just got promoted for being a good little Mormon on his own home planet. At least you don't sue people over it.

But it doesn't even fit the link I provided, because unless you've dropped the Book of Mormon like you did polygamy and that curse of Cain thing, demonstrations of Smith's authorship are a perfectly appropriate answer to what you "really believe". You really believe it was written in ancient America, and you're really wrong. And the whole religion is exposed as a fraud, one of at least half a dozen ways anyone who's not already sold can easily see.


38 posted on 09/18/2005 3:08:28 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
That's a misdirection to get people to avoid looking at (usually accurate) information about what Mormons don't want you to hear

"Usually accurate" information? That means information that is sometimes inaccurate. And if we are judge by your caricature of LDS doctrine, sometimes should be often.

You are free to disbelieve Mormonism. However, it is not right for you to misrepresent our beliefs in an attempt to ridicule or defame the LDS Church. If anyone wants to know what the LDS Church teaches, it is best to go to the source. For as you have demonstrated, the Church's opponents cannot be expected to give a fair or accurate accounting.

We have been over this ground many times before. God has given me sufficient reasons to believe in the truthfulness of Mormonism; you have given no reason not to. I have no interest in arguing any more with you. I suggest we agree to disagree, and leave it at that.

39 posted on 09/19/2005 11:25:08 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
Inaccurate is not synonymous with unsympathetic.

Other readers will be free to draw the conclusion you wish to avoid a debate because you're afraid you'll lose.

40 posted on 09/19/2005 1:29:04 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson