Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.S.P.X Act of Reparation in Fatima
Traditio in Radice ^ | August 25, 2005 | Nicholas D.C. Wansbutter

Posted on 08/25/2005 9:17:11 PM PDT by murphE

Thursday, August 25, 2005

S.S.P.X Act of Reparation in Fatima

Posted by at 8:04 AM

I still haven't been able to find any reports on the S.S.P.X pilgrimage to Fatima, however, with what French I command, I was able to find the following site which gives a detailed account of the event: La Porte Latine: Pélerinage de réparation à Fatima

I shall attempt to translate a summary accompanied by some of the best pictures. For the rest of the pictures you can visit the link. I apologise in advance if my translations are not 100% accurate, as my French is more than a little rusty after years of under use. Nevertheless, I think I shall be able to give our readers a good "taste" of the pilgrimage. Keep in mind the necessity for this pilgrimage: the desecration of the Fatima shrine by Hindu pagans, abetted by the shrine rector and local bishop (neither of whom have been punished by the Vatican).


For tradition, a tent church; a visible sign of persecution.
For Hindus, the sanctuary of Fatima; a visible sign of œcumenical sacrelige.

A Link to Bishop Fellay's sermon in four languages and the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary by the four bishops. (Of course, these four bishops do not constitute all the bishops of the world, nor do they include the Pope in their number, so this doesn't come close to satisfying Our Lady's request, but it certainly doesn't hurt. Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!)

On Saturday, 20th August, 2005, several hundred faithful assisted, by linguistic group, at various conferences on the message of Fatima, œcumenism and restoration given by bishops and priests. I have included pictures of Bishops Williamson and Tissier de Mallerais delivering their conferences. A Ukrainian priest of the traditional Society of St. Josephat stands next to Bp. Tissier de Mallerais in the lower picture. The same evening, Fr. Jacqmin presented a film on the history of the S.S.P.X.

On Sunday, 21st August, 2005, the pontifical mass was celebrated by Bishop Fellay in a meadow near Fatima.


The article continues with yet more pictures showing the nearly 2,000 faithful in attendance under the blazing Portugese sun (N.B. the modest dress which one could juxtapose with the comportment of the thousands that attended the W.Y.D. mass). I have included but a small sampling here.

The article reports that enthusiasm and meditation were "palpable". A large a thank you to Father Lorber and his chorale for the beauty of the chants and hymns. Large thanks, also, to the incredible devotion, without fault, of the three Windel brothers and their friends who provided the sound system, ushering, &c.; all with a kindness and a professionalism which did honour to catholicity!

All of the traditional communities "alligned" with the S.S.P.X were represented: around fifty religious sisters, and more than 150 friars, seminarians, monks and priests. Deo gratias!

The four bishops of the Society, as requested by Our Lady of Fatima (as communicated to Lucy), then consecrated Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. The pontifical mass was completed around 1 p.m., followed by the act of consecration. As reported previously, this all began at 10:00 a.m.

At 5:00 p.m. traditional Stations of the Cross were conducted in five different languages (at five different locations) - the languages were French, English, Spanish, Polish, and Ukrainian. In the above pictures we see Father Angel of Bellaigue "distracting" some sisters of the S.S.P.X on their way to where the Stations would begin, and in the lower picture, faithful on the Way of the Cross. This was completed around 8:00 p.m.

On Monday, 22nd August, 2005, after the low mass, which gathered nearly 2,000 pilgrims once again, Fathers Bouchacourt (French), Couture (English), de Montagut (Spanish) and Stehlin (German and Polish) explained to the pilgrims, in frank and "direct" terms why it was necessary to make this act of reparation. The Mother of God had been insulted and God had been insulted, by an act sacrilege made in the very sanctuary of Fatima. It was required then, for the honour and glory of God, to make reparation for this insult to His Holy Mother!

The international procession then moved out for the act of reparation. The whole planet was represented, although it seemed that Germany and France had the largest contingents. But the Americans, both North and the South, had also come in great numbers. Switzerland, relative to its Catholic population, had by far the best representation. Belgium and the Netherlands were not far behind. Austria, the Baltic States, Russia, Ukraine, Singapore, China, India also had a successful showing of delegates, as they too, desired to make reparation in the name of the universal Church. Africa did not miss this opportunity for penitence and of reparation, with several misionnaires dressed in their very white habits. The procession, immense and colourful, impressed the Portugese locals and many of them stopped the bishops to ask for blessings.

(Finally, the grand conclusion!) The four bishops of the S.S.P.X knelt in front of the statue of Our Lady of Fatima under Capelhina.

The arrival on the esplanade went well and attracted the curious glances of the tourist-pilgrims of Fatima. The language of the Church, Latin, resounded on the esplanade of Fatima as the Litanie of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Litanies of the Blessed Virgin were chanted. With the traditional pilgrims' arrival in front of Capelhina, a group of ten guards of the sanctuary tried to dissuade the pilgrims from advancing in front of Capelhina under the pretext that they did not have written authorization from the shrine recrtor, due to his absence... (the Rector had received Father Maret and had given his agreement for "an" hour of prayer....). But since when does one need an official paper to make reparation for the ridiculed honour of Our Lady? 2,000 faithful pushed slowly past, and the barriers opened or rather... yielded.

(Now, my rusty French had some difficulty with this last bit, so the details may be a bit off ...) During the recitation of the rosary for reparation, two cleaning ladies decided to vacuum in Capelhina. Under the general words of dissaproval, including that of the Portuguese pilgrims, the cleaners beat a slow retreat. Then two [Novus Ordo] nuns arrived who wanted to sing with the microphone a Portuguese song ... It was microphone against microphone: as the volume went up, the tempers started to warm as well. Unfortunately, a Redemptorist brother could not hold his temper any longer: he jumped the barriers and drew himself up in front of the nuns to put an end to this new insult.

It took the intervention of the police and an unambiguous order from Bishop de Galarreta, before the brother who had taken holy but regrettable anger joined his place in the procession and took up again the recitation of the rosary which was immediately stopped by the sound system of the sanctuary being put to maximum volume by the "authorities", playing loud music ...

The rosary was concluded, the act of reparation pronounced and attended to, the honour of the Blessed Virgin was raised up: thank you, God and forgive all the sins of the world.



I must say that having read of this wonderful pilgrimage my spirits are totally restored after the blow they took over the last few days from W.Y.D. and the new advancements in oecumenism. It was a real pleasure seeing all this true, old school, Catholicism in these pictures. May God have mercy on us through this act of reparation, so sorely needed after the desecration of the Hindu ceremony. The only hint of meloncholy over this stems from the fact that only the S.S.P.X undertook this good work, and that my wife and I were unable to attend due to my inability to get time off work. Just seeing the pictures, hearing Bishop Fellay's solidly Catholic sermon, and reading of the weekend's events filled me with joy and enthusuasm nevertheless. I encourage our readers to follow the links I provided and see all of the pictures.

Addendum: A tip of the bowler to "Jimmy the Hand" for providing the following LINK which gives further information and a first-hand account of the event. He posted this in the comments section but I wanted to put it up with the main article to ensure everyone sees it.

Posted on the Feast of St. Louis IX, a.D. MMV



TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Ecumenism; Prayer; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholic; fatima; tradition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2005 9:17:12 PM PDT by murphE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: murphE

All we need now is for the SSPX to atone and repair for their heresy, scandal, and schism, and everything will be honkey-dorey again. Then, even I'll rejoice.

-Theo


2 posted on 08/26/2005 3:22:20 AM PDT by Teófilo (Visit Vivificat! - http://www.vivificat.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo
A Link to Bishop Fellay's sermon in four languages and the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary by the four bishops. (Of course, these four bishops do not constitute all the bishops of the world, nor do they include the Pope in their number, so this doesn't come close to satisfying Our Lady's request, but it certainly doesn't hurt. Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!)

* The SSPX undertake a pilgrimmage to Fatima and once there they engage in spiritual theatre misleading their followers as to the facts of the Consecration and, in effect, calling Pope John Paul II and Sr. Lucy public liars.

VATICAN CITY, DEC 20, 2001 (VIS) - Made public today was a communique regarding a meeting which took place at the convent of Coimbra, Portugal, on November 17, 2001, between Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone S.D.B., secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and Sister Mary Lucy of Jesus and of the Immaculate Heart.

"Over the last few months," says the communique, "and especially following the sad event of the terrorist attack of September 11, articles have appeared in various newspapers regarding presumed new revelations by Sister Lucy, announcements of warning letters to the Pope and apocalyptic re-interpretations of the message of Fatima.

"Moreover, emphasis has been given to the suspicion that the Holy See has not published the integral text of the third part of the 'secret,' and some 'Fatimid' movements have repeated the accusation that the Holy Father has not yet consecrated Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

"For this reason, in order to obtain clarification and information directly from the surviving visionary, it was considered necessary to organize a meeting with Sister Lucy. This took place in the presence of the prioress of the Carmelite convent of St. Teresa and of Fr. Luis Kondor S.V.D., vice-postulator of the causes of Blesseds Francisco and Jacinta; and with the permission of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and of the bishops of Leiria-Fatima and Coimbra."

"The meeting, which lasted more than two hours, took place on the afternoon of Saturday, November 17. Sister Lucy, who will be 95 on March 22 next year, was in good health, lucid and vivacious. She first of all professed her love for and devotion to the Holy Father. She prays much for him and for the Church as a whole."

With reference to the third part of the secret of Fatima, she affirmed that she had attentively read and meditated upon the booklet published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and confirmed everything that was written there. To whoever imagines that some part of the secret has been hidden, she replied: "Everything has been published; no secret remains." To those who speak and write of new revelations she said: "There is no truth in this. If I had received new revelations I would have told no-one, but I would have communicated them directly to the Holy Father."

Sister Lucy was asked: "What do you say to the persistent affirmations of Fr. Gruner who is gathering signatures in order that the Pope may finally consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, which has never been done?". She replied: "The Carmelite Community has rejected the forms for gathering the signatures. I have already said that the consecration that Our Lady desired was accomplished in 1984 and was accepted in heaven."

* For some reason, the SSPX thinks it can get away with this public campaign to malign Pope John Paul the Great and to dishonor the actual witness of Sr. Lucy. They are hateful shameless liars.

3 posted on 08/26/2005 4:26:14 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: murphE
"[...] my spirits are totally restored after the blow they took over the last few days from W.Y.D. and the new advancements in [sic]oecumenism."

And I must say, these words could come straight from Satan's own lips.
4 posted on 08/26/2005 6:44:34 AM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murphE
Keep in mind the necessity for this pilgrimage: the desecration of the Fatima shrine by Hindu pagans, abetted by the shrine rector and local bishop (neither of whom have been punished by the Vatican)

Like SSPXers are the only Catholics who go there. Between May and October each year, millions visit Fatima. Why does their loving presence not make up for the "desecration"- assuming that the Hindu presence there really was such?

I wonder which is really more offensive to God. Pagan hearts or proud, obstinate ones?

5 posted on 08/26/2005 8:03:00 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
I have already said that the consecration that Our Lady desired was accomplished in 1984 and was accepted in heaven."

In a 1985 interview in Sol de Fatima, Sister Lucy was asked if the Pope fulfilled the request of Our Lady when he consecrated the world n 1984, Sister Lucy replied, "There was no participation of all the bishops, and there was no mention of Russia." She was then asked,"So the consecration was not done as requested by Our Lady?" to which she replied: No. Many Bishops attached no importance to this act."
6 posted on 08/26/2005 8:18:13 AM PDT by sempertrad ("You call this a multi-media event? This is a slide projector and a bedsheet!" - A. Asparagus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Like SSPXers are the only Catholics who go there. Between May and October each year, millions visit Fatima. Why does their loving presence not make up for the "desecration"

Did those millions of Catholics visiting Fatima make an act of reparation to Our Lady? I wonder how many among them thought such an act was even necessary?

If there was an organized, public act of reparation among those millions at some point, please post details. It would surely be great to know about others who have already done such a thing.
7 posted on 08/26/2005 8:24:17 AM PDT by sempertrad ("You call this a multi-media event? This is a slide projector and a bedsheet!" - A. Asparagus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt
And I must say, these words could come straight from Satan's own lips.

And I must say offering prayers to Our Lord and our Lady doesn't remind one of Satan. Blasting music and yelling into microphones so as to make those prayer inaudible, however...
8 posted on 08/26/2005 8:27:45 AM PDT by sempertrad ("You call this a multi-media event? This is a slide projector and a bedsheet!" - A. Asparagus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo
All we need now is for the SSPX to atone and repair for their heresy, scandal, and schism, and everything will be honkey-dorey again. Then, even I'll rejoice.

-Theo

"Honkey-dorey"? Is that where everything's O.K. with white guys? Check your bible on when to rejoice, Junior. You might find this:

Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth with the truth.

-1 Corinthians 13:6

9 posted on 08/26/2005 9:35:11 AM PDT by Luddite Patent Counsel (Theyre digging through all of your files, stealing back your best ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt

What do you mean?


10 posted on 08/26/2005 9:59:25 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("O Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us... and... especially the enemies of the Church.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bornacatholic
To those who speak and write of new revelations she said: "There is no truth in this. If I had received new revelations I would have told no-one, but I would have communicated them directly to the Holy Father."

If there have been no new revelations, how could Sr. Lucy know for certain that the 1984 consecration was "accepted by Heaven"?

For some reason, the SSPX thinks it can get away with this public campaign to malign Pope John Paul the Great and to dishonor the actual witness of Sr. Lucy. They are hateful shameless liars.

Don't pin this on the SSPX. They are not responsible for the many inconsistances which the faithful have received from nearly everyone directly in charge of Sr. Lucy and the Fatima events. The only ones who have "dishonored" Sr. Lucy are those who forbade her to speak about the Fatima events freely and then acted as her spokesmen: even going so far as to suggest that much of what Our Lady told her/showed her might not really have happened and were merely the result of Sr. Lucy's own imagination based on pious books she read as a child.

IYO, was Mother Angelica being a "hateful shameful liar" for thinking that "we didn't get the whole thing" with regard to the release of the Third Secret?
11 posted on 08/26/2005 10:25:09 AM PDT by sempertrad ("You call this a multi-media event? This is a slide projector and a bedsheet!" - A. Asparagus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo

God bless SSPX for doing something the Vatican did not have the guts to do as our Lady demanded!


12 posted on 08/26/2005 10:34:22 AM PDT by BulldogCatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
I mean Satan is displeased by World Youth Day and authentic ecumenism. He did not like seeing thousands of young people sitting for catechesis, adoring the Eucharist, and contemplating a religious vocation. Nor does he like any kind of friendly solidarity among the children of God. Division is what he likes. Unity saws him off.

I'm sure the Pope's recent trip really did a number on Satan's spirits.
Papa tore him a new one, Deo Gratias.
13 posted on 08/26/2005 10:41:57 AM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sempertrad

LOL


14 posted on 08/26/2005 11:10:31 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt

Good post

I agree with you on that one

I think WYD -when done correctly is a good thing

It is a shame though that we cant get this catechesis back in our church's RCD programs.
Even Pre-Cana is now farmed out to the laity instead of a good Traditional priest

My wife and I sat through (8) 3 hour sessions one on one with a Traditional Priest with a huge textbook for our pre-cana at a "Traditional" church and it was amazing and strengthened our marriage and we knew what we were getting into.

Now the Novus Ordo puts 5 or 6 couples and crams it down their throat over some weekend, or visits with a "happily married couple" at their house for pre-cana. And you wonder why the divorce rate is where it is, even among catholics. But with 60,000 annulments a year now granted by the church, some for the highest bidder (aka Teddy Kennedy) marriage is just an extension of dating for many

God bless
Others go


15 posted on 08/26/2005 2:10:02 PM PDT by BulldogCatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
assuming that the Hindu presence there really was such?

Do you really wish to dispute what is common knowledge as to what happened with the Hindu presence at Fatima? Really?

Quote:
Likewise, the SIC reporter who accompanied the Hindus from Lisbon to Fatima was interviewed in mid-June by a representative of The Fatima Crusader who traveled to Portugal to further investigate the event. The SIC reporter said that Our Lady of Fatima, “means one thing for Catholics, another thing for the Hindus, and even for the Moslems has another importance, does it not? For the Moslems, she is the daughter of the prophet; for the Catholic, we mean the Mother of Jesus Christ; for the Hindus, she is the most important of the goddesses, the Most Holy Mother goddess, as they call her, the Holy Mother Creator.” Thus, Guerra might say that the Hindus did not specifically tell him that they equated Our Blessed Mother with one of their false gods. But the Hindus clearly told the SIC reporter of this equation, as is evident from the young Hindu women in the broadcast, and from the reporter who would have received his information from the Hindus themselves. This is why SIC reported that the day the Hindus went to Fatima “was dedicated to the greatest of all female deities. She is called the Most Holy Mother, the goddess Devi, the deity of Nature who many Portuguese Hindus also find in Fatima.” unquote
From www.fatima.org

Read more on the travesty of the desecration of this shrine which was founded in respect and recognition of our Blessed Mother at Fatima.
By the way, have you heard Bishop Fellay is meeting with His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI a week from Monday? Evidently our new Pope believes it important to meet with the head of the SSPX notwithstanding the protestations of many in the novus ordo establishment who have run things for forty some years.

16 posted on 08/26/2005 3:09:24 PM PDT by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom
I'm aware of what happened at Fatima.

I'm simply unsure that God and His Blessed Mother are as a)offended and b)threatened by the Hindu presence as some seem to be.

As I mentioned in my previous post, God looks at hearts and I'm far from convinced that the hearts of some of these pagans are further from Him than those of the self-righteous. That's why I'm not at all certain that anything has been desecrated and hence, am unsure of the need for a pilgrimmage of reparation.

The tone of the article is one of "let's get rid of the smell of those horrible Hindus".

You guys are really walking on shaky ground.

17 posted on 08/26/2005 4:13:37 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I'm simply unsure that God and His Blessed Mother are as a)offended and b)threatened by the Hindu presence as some seem to be.

I do not have the temerity to suggest reactions from Almighty God and His Blessed Mother on these or other issues. It is, however, within our rights and prerogatives to be judgemental on matters such as this. In fact, we are called to defend Fatima as a sacred site reserved to the veneration of our Blessed Mother. This isn't a matter of "self righteousness." It is a matter of absolute importance and a fundamental defense of the Faith. You can appreciate the difference, no?

You guys are really walking on shaky ground.

Huh? In what way?
To defend our Blessed Virgin Mary?
Attempting to preserve the sacredness of this site and offer prayers and reparations to Mary and Her Immaculate Heart for the sins and deviations from the teachings of our Faith?
If one is aware of what happened at Fatima, and recognizes the damage and irreparable harm that occurred there, there is then a duty to rise up to meet the challenge -- to try and provide a rationalization for what occurred or attempt to position is as not as bad as other activity or reactions is called, quite simply, relativism. That is abhorrent.

18 posted on 08/26/2005 5:09:30 PM PDT by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

Yes-and after the cat got out of the bag and JPII "The Great" tried to blame the Bishop over at Fatima for the desecration, the Bishop said the Vatican and JPII had "full knowledge" of the Hindu worship (after all JPII did get cow dung and "shiva"put on his head by a Hindu) and he let the cat out of the bag and the so called Fatima Pope was really in cohoots with its desecration


19 posted on 08/26/2005 6:43:29 PM PDT by BulldogCatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I'm simply unsure that God and His Blessed Mother are as a)offended and b)threatened by the Hindu presence as some seem to be.

You shouldn't be unsure if you know the first commandment. "Golden calf" ring any bells for you? God and Our Blessed Mother of course were not threatened, but we do know what God says about worshiping false gods. God and Our Blessed Mother were most definitely offended by this act of worshiping a false god, especially at a site consecrated to Our Lady, not just the mere Hindu presence as you put it, so euphemistically.

And the Lord spoke all these words: I am the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt not have strange gods before me. Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth. Thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them: I am the Lord thy God, mighty, jealous, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me.
Exodus 20:1-5
20 posted on 08/26/2005 7:56:35 PM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson