Skip to comments.
PATRIARCH’S PARDON: Vartholomaios forgives Catholics for sack of Constantinople in 1204
ekathimerini.com ^
| Wednesday April 14, 2004
| ekathimerini.com
Posted on 04/14/2004 10:44:45 AM PDT by Destro
Wednesday April 14, 2004
PATRIARCHS PARDON
Vartholomaios forgives Catholics for sack of Constantinople in 1204
Ecumenical Patriarch Vartholomaios yesterday forgave Catholics for the 1204 sack of Constantinople by crusaders from the Fourth Crusade during a liturgy in Istanbul marking the 800th anniversary of the event and attended by Cardinal Philippe Barbarin, Archbishop of Lyon. We cannot forget that tragic day for Constantinople and for our Patriarchate but we forgive... and we accept with satisfaction the expression of their regret and the reassurance that the West will never again undertake such an abomination against the Christians of the East, Vartholomaios said. It is a fact that a great sin was committed against Constantinople 800 years ago, Cardinal Barbarin said.
TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Ecumenism; General Discusssion; History; Orthodox Christian; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: balkans; catholiclist; constantinople; crusade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: FBDinNJ
41
posted on
04/14/2004 9:29:12 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Exactly! the Pala D'Oro and the horses are looted treasure from the 4th crusadeThe Patriarch's gonna croak when he sees what a storage bill for 800 years comes to.
42
posted on
04/14/2004 9:35:50 PM PDT
by
Romulus
("Behold, I make all things new")
To: Destro
Ha! Well I'm a history major @ Villanova University and everything you're stating is in direct contrast to the accepted thought on the situation oEf the Eastern mpire at the collapse of the Roman Empire. Even if the Emperor remained "Dominus Noster," the average person in the Eastern Empire would not have understood what that meant because they were all speaking Greek if not Syriac or Coptic.
I place my faith in my Professors and in Averil Cameron's books rather than in some Professor @ Tomball College
43
posted on
04/14/2004 9:36:15 PM PDT
by
FBDinNJ
To: FBDinNJ
the average person in the Eastern Empire right down to the end called themselves "Romaioi". The Orthodox church considers itself the legate and defender of Rome of ROMIOSINI.
44
posted on
04/14/2004 9:45:16 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
The average citizen in the Eastern Empire could have called themselves whatever they wanted to for all I care. But the fact that they considered themselves Roman was part of the problem, which led to the downfall of Roman Imperial power. This situation with an ever expanding group of people who held Roman citizenship eventually led to people from 'barbaria' attaining citizenship. This situation eventually led to Germanic tribes crossing the Rhine and eventually the sack of Rome and the downfall of the Western Empire.
Alright lets assume your premise is true that the Orthodox church considers itself the legate and defender of Rome. Just for the sake of argument lets say that's true.
They clearly didn't do a decent job then did they? Rome was not defended at all by her Eastern citizens, who quickly even revolted against the control of the Eastern Emperor as a result of the Monophysite heresy. These same people who betrayed the West eventually betrayed the east and helped the Islamic armies conquer formerly Christian lands. What kind of defense is that?
45
posted on
04/14/2004 9:56:56 PM PDT
by
FBDinNJ
To: FBDinNJ
How can a good Catholic not be aware of St. Augustine's work the "City of God"? The Orthodox church is not a temporal power but a spiritual one and a legate of what is called ROMIOSINI. ROMIOSINI - ROMANITAS can not be explained with a few words.
The Patriarch, unlike Pope does not and did not command nor will ever command armies in the field like a temporal ruler.
Constantinople did a great job in defending Europe. She bore the brunt of Islamic expansion and converted the Russian and Slavic peoples to Christianity. She preserved the fruits of classical civilization for a later generation.
46
posted on
04/14/2004 10:06:09 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Kristos Anesti!
The commentary outside FR on this has been fun. There are certainly a lot of trad-RC, like the blue army, etc, who are fuming and frothing at the mouth over this one. Tsk tsk.
Look for Seattle Catholic to have a scathing write-up soon.
It was nice of us to forgive them even if they have kept all the stolen loot and even sent it out to show it off on museum tours. Guess we can only ask so much. Money is money after all, and certainly that stuff is worth a lot by now.
47
posted on
04/14/2004 10:46:15 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MarMema
What would you have preferred? That the Muslims got the relics and destroyed them? I mean look at what the Turks have done, they turned Haigi Sophia into a mosque and then a museum, and their whole plan of storing gun powder in the Parthenon while the Venetians were shooting rockets at the Acropolis wasn't the best idea ever either.
48
posted on
04/15/2004 9:52:48 AM PDT
by
FBDinNJ
To: Destro
Well Destro I don't know about the acuracy of your statement, because the current Patriarch did serve in the military and was an officer in the Turkish military from 1961 till 1963.
Doesn't seem too spiritual to me.
49
posted on
04/15/2004 9:56:26 AM PDT
by
FBDinNJ
To: FBDinNJ
He was not the Patriarch then, Nimrod. You are not born into teh clergy you know? Jesus.
50
posted on
04/15/2004 10:13:24 AM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Yes you're not born into the clergy, but it is the imperative of the Bishops of the Church to pick worthy leaders. The eastern Bishops clearly didn't care that Black Bart's record is definitely stained by the fact that he was in the military of the heathen Turks
51
posted on
04/15/2004 10:20:28 AM PDT
by
FBDinNJ
To: FBDinNJ
Nope. Serving in the military is not a sin. St. George served in the Christian killing Pagan legions of the Roman empire.
52
posted on
04/15/2004 10:25:11 AM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Christians are supposed to refrain from serving in heathen Armies.
If you look at all early church documents it tells believers to refrain from serving in the military and this is a result of their being under pagan/heathen control. This ban was eventually lifted when the Roman Empire became Christian.
53
posted on
04/15/2004 10:29:27 AM PDT
by
FBDinNJ
To: Destro
I guess Christians can only serve when it's the Crusades...under the pope.
54
posted on
04/15/2004 1:24:17 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: FBDinNJ
If this is a sin - Catholics beleive in perpetual sins?
55
posted on
04/15/2004 3:26:54 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: All
Oh, for crying out loud! The Muslims are hellbent upon destroying us and you guys (of both sides) want to fight over WHAT?
Damned ignorant fools. All of you! Get your acts together before the REAL enemy gloats over our charred corpses!
A dumba$$ ally is worse than a powerful enemy.
56
posted on
04/16/2004 12:25:30 AM PDT
by
broadsword
(The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for Democrats to get elected.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson