Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: redhead
It is--as someone above has said--the effect on the living that is the problem. It is presumptuous and obnoxious--in my opinion--to manipulate the memory of the deceased for anything that they would not have wanted when alive. I just don't buy it.
21 posted on 12/21/2003 7:04:20 AM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for democracy: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Pharmboy
"It is--as someone above has said--the effect on the living that is the problem. It is presumptuous and obnoxious--in my opinion--to manipulate the memory of the deceased for anything that they would not have wanted when alive. I just don't buy it."

Yes, you are correct. I guess I was thinking of the "effect" on the souls of the deceased. But the survivors must be not just brokenhearted but infuriated when they hear of this kind of presumptuous nonsense. Just one more reason why I left...

28 posted on 12/21/2003 7:40:50 AM PST by redhead (Les Français sont des singes de capitulation qui mangent du fromage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
Because we all know that the eye-opening experience of death and say, perhaps, meeting Jesus Christ with his arm around Joseph Smith and saying: Let me introduce you to someone, would never change anyone's mind. :-)

296 posted on 12/22/2003 11:45:04 AM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson