To: redhead
It is--as someone above has said--the effect on the living that is the problem. It is presumptuous and obnoxious--in my opinion--to manipulate the memory of the deceased for anything that they would not have wanted when alive. I just don't buy it.
21 posted on
12/21/2003 7:04:20 AM PST by
Pharmboy
(History's greatest agent for democracy: The US Armed Forces)
To: Pharmboy
"It is--as someone above has said--the effect on the living that is the problem. It is presumptuous and obnoxious--in my opinion--to manipulate the memory of the deceased for anything that they would not have wanted when alive. I just don't buy it."Yes, you are correct. I guess I was thinking of the "effect" on the souls of the deceased. But the survivors must be not just brokenhearted but infuriated when they hear of this kind of presumptuous nonsense. Just one more reason why I left...
28 posted on
12/21/2003 7:40:50 AM PST by
redhead
(Les Français sont des singes de capitulation qui mangent du fromage.)
To: Pharmboy
Because we all know that the eye-opening experience of death and say, perhaps, meeting Jesus Christ with his arm around Joseph Smith and saying: Let me introduce you to someone, would never change anyone's mind. :-)
296 posted on
12/22/2003 11:45:04 AM PST by
frgoff
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson