[Texas Federalist]

He ruled it was an unconstitutional infringement of the telemarketers free speech. It is unclear at this point whether the judge attended law school.

[m1-lightning]

He ruled it was an unconstitutional infringement of the telemarketers free speech. It is unclear at this point whether the judge attended law school.

LMAO! What about disturbing the peace?

[tiamat]

Free Speech, huh?

Well my family has a right to be LEFT ALONE , especially during dinner.

What's this clown's home phone number and what time ddo they serve dinner where he lives?

Tia

[Let's Roll]

Is just me or was the First Amendment protection only intended for political speech?

[jerri]

That is pathetic that the free speech of annoying telemarketers is more important than the wishes of those that they are annoying.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

He ruled it was an unconstitutional infringement of the telemarketers free speech.

Maybe they should publish the judges's home telephone number so the 50 million people who he just screwed can express THEIR free speech.

[jimkress]

It is unclear at this point whether the judge attended law school.

No. It is unclear at this point whether the judge attended GRADE school.

[FreeReign]

He ruled it was an unconstitutional infringement of the telemarketers free speech.

The judge made a liberal ruling.

[LibFreeUSA]

- "He ruled it was an unconstitutional infringement of the telemarketers free speech. It is unclear at this point whether the judge attended law school.

I don't know about many of you here, but your 'ideology' seems to be getting in the way of a 'higher principle' here, Freedom of Speech!

Quit trashing the courts, when a ruling is being based on protecting Freedom of Speech. Take time to really consider the implications of the issue and the arguements involved, and what is at stake here.

Sure, I hate telemarketers. But, I'm am not willing to sacrifice any undue encroachment on the 1st Amendment for the sake of NOT RECEIVING a telemarketer's call.