Skip to comments.
Second U.S. Judge Blocks 'Do-Not-Call' List
Fox News ^
| http://www.foxnews.com/
Posted on 09/25/2003 4:10:17 PM PDT by Hotdog
War of the laws?...whats next?
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: donotcalllist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 401-408 next last
To: Texas Federalist
It is unclear at this point whether the judge attended law school. No. It is unclear at this point whether the judge attended GRADE school.
81
posted on
09/25/2003 5:16:51 PM PDT
by
jimkress
(Go away Pat Go away!)
To: Diddle E. Squat
Federal judge in Denver rules that it violates free speech rights. Total bullcrap. I own the phone, I pay for it, all the DNCall list does it give me a CHOICE to limit the type of calls allowed to come into MY PHONE.
I have "Privacy Manager" on BOTH of my lines. It basically says to the caller if you don't provide caller ID info, you don't get thru! Are these courts now going to make THAT illegal too?
82
posted on
09/25/2003 5:17:41 PM PDT
by
teletech
(Have we dug up Saddam yet?)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Is it dinnertime in Denver yet?
83
posted on
09/25/2003 5:18:18 PM PDT
by
kcar
(T)
To: Graybeard58
The law does not prevent the telemarketers from speaking. However, There is no constitutional requirement that anyone has to listen. According to the 'logic' of this idiot judge, if I want to write a letter to the editor of the NY Times, they MUST print my letter since to not print it is a violation of my right to speak.
84
posted on
09/25/2003 5:20:18 PM PDT
by
jimkress
(Go away Pat Go away!)
To: Political Junkie Too
If instead of phoning me at 8:00pm they stood outside my window and called into my home, would that be any different? If I ask them to stop, they should stop and not claim free speech.If they don't stop, there's always the 2nd Amendment:
To: Diddle E. Squat
No, maybe Congress should declare more federal tax on phone use by businesses if they generate a certain percentage of their overall business by phone solicitation.
To: Hotdog
What I don't understand is how the states that already had DO NOT CALL were functioning all this time. This new edict applies only to the national list. The individual states are not included in the new order.
87
posted on
09/25/2003 5:22:58 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: Hotdog
Heh heh!
To: seamole
They should amend the Constitution, legalize bills of Attainder for ONE DAY ONLY and have half the judiciary's heads on pikes by tomorrow at sunset.
That would work.
89
posted on
09/25/2003 5:25:30 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: kcar
Because I don't have a mouthful of food when they ask me those questions...I'm setting aside time to answer those questions at my convenience...not theirs...after all I'm the customer. If I want it I'll ask for it
otherwise leave me alone!
90
posted on
09/25/2003 5:25:42 PM PDT
by
Hotdog
To: TomGuy
The Judge's problem with the list is that it gives preferential exemption to charitable (and political) organizations. Tax laws are preferential to charities and political campaigns too. Will this judge throw out the tax code?
91
posted on
09/25/2003 5:28:22 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: grayout
And we could have a funeral persession come by your house every morning and block your driveway before you go to work. You can always ride your bike to work get around or there's always the bus at a very low price.
92
posted on
09/25/2003 5:28:57 PM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(- A Charge To Keep -)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
I like the way you take the Amendments in order...sounds as if the founding fathers could really look into the future...
93
posted on
09/25/2003 5:30:08 PM PDT
by
Hotdog
Comment #94 Removed by Moderator
To: m1-lightning
If that many people are dieing in my community..I'm getting the heck out!
95
posted on
09/25/2003 5:31:20 PM PDT
by
Hotdog
To: Hotdog
I told you all so! (from yesterday)
Bad law, bad idea, don't need the govt regulating our phones.
To: Hotdog
I guess I'm dead for spelling dying wrong...
97
posted on
09/25/2003 5:33:00 PM PDT
by
Hotdog
To: grayout
Has anyone gotten any solicitations by phone in the last two nights. We haven't and it's D**N GOOD THING!
To: Professional
I agree to a point...but I think it's time to put traffic lights up at this intersection...too many companies trying to hit and run...
99
posted on
09/25/2003 5:34:30 PM PDT
by
Hotdog
To: Graybeard58
Require politicians & charities to observe the requirements of the no-call list.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 401-408 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson