Democratic Surrender Monkeys, The Party of Islam, and 2004

I'd put more faith in the article if it used one of the accepted transliterations of Al Qaeda, rather than the Q-u butchery seen here.

No, I think it should be Democrat Monkey Traitors. They aren't surrendering to the islamofacists, they're collaborating with them.

Democratic Dhimmis (Dummies?)

Some demonrats consider MONKEY a racist term!

Which is pretty insulting to monkeys. Why haven't we heard anything from PETA?

Funny, I've always thought that there is a need to protect the church from the state, not the way he put it.

Not if you're intention is to protect the State Religion.

You are spot on. If the Dims get their way, we'll cut and run from Iraq, leaving it to the U.N., which means the Saddamites will seize control back. And they'll blame it all on the pubbies who, they'll claim, never should have gotten us into that "quagmire" in the first place.

Would the terrorists appreciate us leaving the Middle East? Oh, would they ever express their "appreciation."

al-righty then...

i dont know why youre exactly cheering this. President bush policy is liberation of muslim countries, not to kill off muslims.

perhaps you have the KKK and president Bush mixed up.

They not only eat cheese, they vote for the Government to subsidize it.

To any Dimocrat who's worth the yellow stripe down his/her/it's back, ANYTHING coming out of the mouth of a conservative has racial undertones. We're all marauding Huns, you know. >;-)

of course, you don't have an agenda, eh Persia?

This article took radicals and organized Muslims who are purposely out to defeat President Bush...why do you think that is? Because they won't stand up and fight the radicals, so we must.

So why are you trying to paint President Bush with the KKK brush?

Do you condemn terrorism? What are you doing about it within your own community? Have you contact the AMC and CAIR to condemn their political stance? Muslims are only alienating themselves. if you check your facts, it's MUSLIMS who killed 3000 Americans on 9-11, it's MUSLIMS in the military who are being arrested for espionage, and it's MUSLIMS in America who are remaining mum on terrorism and combatting it here in the USA.

I suggest you loom down, see which side of the line you are standing on...

Good article! -- deserving of a full posting....

- ConservativeStLouisGuy

______________________________________________________

Democratic Surrender Monkeys, The Party Of Islam, And 2004

Renew America
Jon Alvarez
September 22, 2003

We've witnessed the bowing of the Democratic Party to the anti-war radicals in this country, what many Americans aren't aware of is how the Democratic Party has become the Party of Islam. As we approach the election of 2004, Muslim organizations such as CAIR and the AMC have vowed to throw their support behind any Democratic candidate in order to defeat President Bush and his war on terror. Of course, Al-Quada and every other major terrorist organization are also rooting for a Democratic victory over President Bush. Do we see a disturbing pattern here? A vote for the Democrats in 2004 is a vote for Al Quada.

Muslims in America have proven that they are not willing to be a partner in the war on terror. America is at war with radical Islam and those that support terrorism. Lines in the sand have been drawn, just as President Bush warned the world after 9/11. By choosing to oppose President Bush politically, Muslims groups in America have chosen to ally themselves with their radical brethren. This is very much a black and white issue, with no shades of gray. There are two schools of thought on how to handle terrorists: kill them or appease them. Will we soon hear Democratic candidates chanting "Allah Akbar" on the campaign trail?

The Democratic Surrender Monkeys have been making the rounds on the talk show circuits. They have made it perfectly clear that, according to them, the actions of this administration have been a "miserable failure." Seems the removal of Saddam, the democratization of Iraq, and the continued killing of terrorists in Iraq (as opposed to the streets of NYC) is just not acceptable to them. Democrats have stated that they would reverse most of the actions taken by President Bush. This would include the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. Repeated sound bites of Howard Dean promising to "bring our boys home" equates to abandoning the present mission of establishing a free and stable Iraq. Like their allies across the Atlantic, the French, it would seem that when the going gets tough, the Democrats would get running!

Just last week, Ted Kennedy attacked President Bush and Operation Iraqi Freedom as being based on a lie. No Teddy, claiming you did everything you could do to save poor Mary Jo was a lie. Just because terrorists aided by Saddam Hussein failed to attack the United States doesn't make the perceived threat any less real. Many of these same Democrats voted to allow force to be used in dealing with Saddam Hussein. They had access to the same intelligence reports President Bush had. Of course, they are now using hindsight to attack and discredit President Bush. Imagine if we had the same luxury at our disposal. Wouldn't it be nice if we could use hindsight to fight our enemies? We could have rounded up the 19 Muslim terrorists prior to 9/11. Of course, that would have resulted in cries of racial profiling and harassment. Those poor boys just wanted to learn how to fly, right? Would Democrats have been happier if the United States had been attacked with WMD provided to terrorists by Saddam Hussein?

What course of action do the Democratic Surrender Monkeys propose we take if they happen to win in 2004? Congressman John Murtha (D-PA) was on Hardball the other night, he sounded as if he was prepared to negotiate a cease-fire with Al Quada. Nancy Pelosi wants heads to roll in the Bush administration. She doesn't think it's too much to ask that President Bush be capable of predicting the future. Shame on him for not being prepared to rebuild Iraq, install a democracy, and withdraw our troops after a whole six months! Like the French, the Democrats have done virtually nothing to aid us in this great struggle. They now seek to disgrace America by proposing we surrender at what could be our greatest moment. Can you imagine if FDR had decided not to storm Normandy Beach, because it just looked too tough?

The Democratic Surrender Monkeys are attempting to create their own self-fulfilling prophecy. We have heard their repeated cries about the "Vietnamization" of Iraq. Now that we know how they would handle the current situation, it seems this WOULD be another Vietnam were they in charge. Their "exit strategy" would be to abandon the people of Iraq by pulling our troops out prematurely and allowing the corrupt and grossly inefficient UN to take control. What message would this send to the terrorists? What message would this send to our brave soldiers? This would be very similar to Vietnam were we to pull out with our tails between our legs, before our mission was accomplished. Like deja vu all over again, our military would be left with that same old feeling that it was all for nothing. Terrorists around the world would become emboldened and our country would definitely NOT be safer as a result. The Democratic Surrender Monkeys would have us repeat the same mistakes we made in Somalia. They would prove Saddam Hussein right, that Americans could not stomach another "Black Hawk Down."

The election of 2004 will clearly be a referendum on the war on terror. The policies of the Bush administration in protecting America from further attacks and taking the war to the terrorists will be the deciding issue of the election. The American public will either extend the mandate given to President Bush after September 11th or choose to take an alternate route, one offered by the Democratic Surrender Monkeys and their allies in the United Nations. This election will have dire consequences for our country, as the world will be watching intently, more so than any other election in our history. The terrorists will be watching, too.

A Democratic victory in 2004 would not only play into the hands of the terrorists but would lead to the "Vietnamization" of Iraq. We cannot wage a politically correct war on terror. There is no appeasing these terrorists and we cannot capitulate on Iraq with regards to UN control. A vote for a Democratic candidate is a vote for Al Quada. It's that simple. Our enemies both at home and abroad do not want George Bush in office. It is for these reasons that we must see to it that President Bush wins the election of 2004. We must show the world that America has the resolve, the courage, and the wherewithal to see this through. America is not to be messed with. How will you vote?