Skip to comments.
FReeper jmstein7 made Law Review! Needs input!
9-19-03
| jmstein7
Posted on 09/19/2003 1:26:14 PM PDT by jmstein7
Dear FReeper friends,
I'm writing to let you know that I just found out that I (retroactively) made Law Review at my school (#10 of 308 in my class).
I want to thank all the FReeper law experts who gave me advice and help last year when I was a 1L. I plan to pay you all back by taking our fight to Law Review.
Anyway, I am looking for a topic for my "note", and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions. I was thinking about writing something about election law (Bush v. Gore, Lautenberg, 9th Circuit recall decision, etc.) and the recent intrusion of the judiciary into the political branches of government.
Any help/hints/advice?
Thank you all!
TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: announcements; congrats; constitution; elections; government; news; ny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
1
posted on
09/19/2003 1:26:15 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
Write something about...Truth. Write about how it's not a lawyer's job to bring his politics into the law. The Law is dynamic in and of itself. It doesn't need ideology injected into it. Indeed, one could say that, once ideology is shoe-horned into the law...it's no longer The Law.
To: jmstein7
(#10 of 308 in my class). We're impressed.
3
posted on
09/19/2003 1:29:08 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: jmstein7
Tell them you once killed a plaintiff with your bare hands.
4
posted on
09/19/2003 1:29:12 PM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(No, Travis McGee didn't pay me to say nice things. Read his book!)
To: ambrose
I couldn't have done it without my fellow freepers!
5
posted on
09/19/2003 1:29:40 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
To: jmstein7
No help here, but congrats to you. Way to go.
To: areafiftyone
Thanks, A51!
And Democrats say conservatives are DUMB... HA!
:)
8
posted on
09/19/2003 1:32:08 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: DoughtyOne
Thanks, D1!
(You still have a license to use that bit of intellectual property from earlier in the day :) )
9
posted on
09/19/2003 1:33:20 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
DUHHHHHHHH YUP! ;-)
To: areafiftyone
lol!
11
posted on
09/19/2003 1:34:01 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
;-)
To: jmstein7
How about an note explaining how no one reads law review notes and articles except the people who write them and that they have absolutely no relevance or value whatsoever to the practice of law. (OK, OK, I admit that I didn't make law review and was no where near the top of my class and I'm a bit jealous of your success :-)
To: jmstein7
Congrats,
I was on law review. Very soon you will discover that it is the ultimate Huck Finn (or was it Tom Sawyer?) manipulation. You see, the school needs a law review to remain accredited. Some brilliant administrator decides, "Hey, let's capitalize on the super-competitive nature of law students and tell them it is some great honor to cite-check articles!"
For all the work, it was a great time and some of my best friends to this day are my old law review buddies.
Congratulations. I have no advice on your note or comment topics. Mine was published and I doubt it ever has been read, let alone cited.
To: jmstein7
Anyway, I am looking for a topic for my "note", and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions. I was thinking about writing something about election law (Bush v. Gore, Lautenberg, 9th Circuit recall decision, etc.) and the recent intrusion of the judiciary into the political branches of government.Congratulations!!
You know, there's gonna be a ton of notes written on these cases involving the Constitution and state election laws and most will never be read. I'd recommend you consider some paths that will be less traveled. For example, just about anything involving the laws regulating our health care system may seem mundane now, but will be very hot shortly. People will then be doing research and actually finding your contribution. ;-)
15
posted on
09/19/2003 1:40:09 PM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
("Don't mind people grinnin' in your face." - Son House)
To: jmstein7
Pick a non toxic subject such as amicus curiae briefs.
Plenty of material,what are they, who can file, weight of each brief,what can be filed,etc. etc. quote some outrageous ones and some excellent ones. I wish you lots of luck.
16
posted on
09/19/2003 1:43:01 PM PDT
by
ijcr
(Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
To: jmstein7
(#10 of 308 in my class).Excellent Work!
Congrats!
To: jmstein7
You had better as hell not write it on the Political Question doctrine, particularly in reference to what's going on with the California Recall and the 9th Circuit right now.
That's mine.
On another note, congratulations.
:)
18
posted on
09/19/2003 1:48:10 PM PDT
by
TheAngryClam
(A proud member of the McClintock Militia)
To: Labyrinthos; el_chupacabra; Scenic Sounds; ijcr; MotleyGirl70; TheAngryClam
Thanks, guys!
AC -- I promise I will steer clear of your topic :)
SS&IJCR -- thank you for the advice!
EC -- being cited would be great, but I mainly just want to piss of the libs in my class who live to bring me down.
Labyrinthos -- LMAO
19
posted on
09/19/2003 1:59:16 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
Now, that said, if you are dead set on doing the same thing as I am, the place to start is with 102 Colum. L.Rev. 237, which is an article by Rachel Barkow on the political question doctrine and one of the most recent overviews of its history.
20
posted on
09/19/2003 2:00:31 PM PDT
by
TheAngryClam
(A proud member of the McClintock Militia)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson