Supreme Court Study Finds New Gun Facts

gunlawupdates@gunlaws.com | 17 August, 2003 | Alan Korwin

[marktwain]

This is a brand new book, hot off the presses. Looks like lots of good information here the the OldDominantLiberalMedia didn't want us to know!

[Bonaparte]

This book can be ordered right here right now.

[Congressman Billybob]

MT, thank you for posting this. I always admire anyone who hits the books and does basic research with new results, from material that others had ovrlooked for decades if not centuries.

John, I assume you're aware of this book, and want to ride it into the Supreme Court like John Wayne chasing the bad guy into a saloon on horseback.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Texans for Sale or Rent" posted on FR, other publication to come.

[ConservativeLawyer]

2nd Amendment Ping

[guitar Josh]

This is very good news. Too bad the media won't report it.

[ChewedGum]

This is very good news. Too bad the media won't report it.

I'm sure the NYTimes will...they will just leave out all the cases which don't agree with their position.

Gum

[guitar Josh]

I'm sure the NYTimes will...they will just leave out all the cases which don't agree with their position.

You're right, my mistake.

[therut]

Just Ordered Thanks for the Link!!!

[IncPen]

ping

[MonroeDNA]

Bump!!!

[FreedomPoster]

Ping.

[OXENinFLA]

bump

[Joe Brower]

Interesting. Ultimately, though, we are forced to ask the question, "What good does this do us?". Hopefully, this bodes well for cases like Silveira vs. Lockyer, which, if granted cert, would determine if the RKBA as defined in the 2A is indeed an "individual right".

[harpseal]

Good to hear about this book I shall have to get a copy.

[ExSoldier]

"....Ultimately, though, we are forced to ask the question, "What good does this do us?"

The very FIRST thing I learned in Law School...AFTER: "You teach yourself the LAW, we teach you how to think like a LAWYER"...was something about how the US Supreme Court is the only institution on the planet which visibly demonstrates that change is bad. Showing these cases in a brief to the court is going to be a persuasive element as a reminder of earlier binding precedent. I begin to be cheered just a wee bit more...at least the outlook isn't quite as gloomy as before.

[ninenot]

I'm sure the NYTimes will...they will just leave out all the cases which don't agree with their position.

That should make for a VERY brief review of the book...

BTW, even the Wisconsin Supremes have found that the right to self-defense exists in the State (partially due to the hard work of the NRA and its people in Wisconsin.)

As a result of the decision, issued a couple of weeks ago, Wisconsin NOW has a 'right-to-carry-concealed' WITHOUT A PERMIT situation.

Thousands of innocent children have been butchered by wild-eyed gun-carrying white Christian family men...

[glock rocks]

bttt!

[Ancesthntr]

Someone should get this book appended to either Gorski's or another pro-2A brief, so that (at least) the clerks will HAVE to read it. Having a copy sent to each of the Justices wouldn't be such a bad idea, either.

[Johnny Gage]

Bumpity bump bump bump.