To: EternalVigilance
He could not do anything about abortion even if he wanted to because it has been decided by the supreme court and is not a state issue and the same constitution has a Second Amendment that also takes that issue out of a governors hands.
23 posted on
08/07/2003 3:05:03 AM PDT by
RJayneJ
(To see pictures of Jayne's quilt: http://bulldogbulletin.lhhosting.com/page50.htm)
To: RJayneJ
You are naive if you think that his positions on two of the most critical issues of our day are not a reflection of a real philosophical problem with this man, and that they won't impact the national course of those debates.
Or you have fallen into the celebrity cult of personality win-at-any-cost trap.
I know your activities around here enough to believe it is the former.
To: RJayneJ
He could not do anything about abortion even if he wanted to because it has been decided by the supreme court and is not a state issue and the same constitution has a Second Amendment that also takes that issue out of a governors hands.That's akin to saying a drunk who insists on driving is safe because he only had access to whiskey--not beer or wine.
206 posted on
08/10/2003 5:25:06 PM PDT by
Kevin Curry
(Put Justice Janice Rogers Brown on the Supreme Court--NOW)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson