Posted on 08/06/2003 6:14:18 PM PDT by chance33_98
Homosexuality serves no useful purpose
Gilbert Williams’ outrageous lies about homosexuality among dumb animals is simply shameful. Homosexuality comprises a barren act that serves no useful purpose in nature, therefore no collection of living creatures whether man or animal, can sustain themselves from generation to generation exclusively through this practice – it brings death. Furthermore, since when do we look to animals for guidance on sexual morality: animals routinely practice incestuous relationships, polygamy and spousal abuse. Does Gilbert Williams, suggest we do the same?
Additionally, if homosexual acts were also practiced among animals, then such acts would be readily observed by all and sundry and there is no need to learn of such accounts in books.
Besides, if homosexual unions were historically so acceptable, natural and as commonplace as Mr. Williams claims then, how and why did it come to pass that homosexuality is universally outlawed, until recently, in all countries and condemned by all major religions?
Now consider this Ken Scott: a 1978 American study found that 43 per cent of male homosexuals estimated they had sex with more than 500 partners and 28 per cent had more than 1 000 partners (clearly a neurosis); the incidence of sexually transmitted disease (including hepatitis) was seven times higher among homosexuals and in some categories it was as high as 20 times; the life expectancy from all causes of homosexual males was 43, and with the advent of AIDS, it is now 39. A BBC report of June 26, 2003 mentioned that the incidence of AIDS among homosexuals was ten times higher than that in the general population; and 52 per cent of the AIDS cases in the US are among homosexuals. In summary, homosexuality is unhealthy and condemns our young men to an early grave. Given these glaring statistics, opposing the homosexual cause is neither stupid nor ignorant.
The laws of Barbados permit marriage between one man and one woman, which is as much a prescription against homosexuality as it is against bigamy. It applies equally to every man and woman. There is no discrimination; it protects every one equally. The law must not be changed because you do not feel good obeying it.
The book “Religious Apartheid” quoted statistics which revealed that 75 per cent of all paedophiles in the US are homosexual. Mr. Scott’s assertion that most homosexuals abhor child abuse rings hollow since I am yet to hear organisations such as Lambada, GLAD or ACT-up publicly denounce NAMBLA for its public policy of molesting little eight-year-old boys. What you do not say also condemns you.
Homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt children; the trauma and shame visited on children raised by two “mummies” or two “daddies” should not be a burden society imposes on children. Children are not pet puppies who need only to be fed and housed; they also need moral and spiritual guidance. Children should not be recruited into a social experiment to further the political agenda of militant homosexuals. If homosexuals truly wished to have and to care for children they would forgo their homosexual lifestyles and enter stable heterosexual relationships since American surveys indicate that less than one per cent of homosexuals are exclusively homosexual, which means that they can and do perform sexually with someone of the opposite sex.
We do not need the psuedo-science of sociologists, psychiatrists or psychologists to tell us that homosexuality is wrong; they masquerade ideology as science. The “Bible” condemns homosexuality in the strongest terms and that is enough for us.
Ken Scott, God did not make you a homosexual. Your homosexuality is the result of a deprivation neurosis and in trying to deal with that neurosis you have developed an inordinate sexual attachment or attraction to other men just as other people in dealing with a neurosis they develop an inordinate attachment to people, objects or substances. For the homosexual is insecure in his gender identity and in his confusion he attempts to attach himself to someone of the same sex in an effort to attain an identity. It is a disordered love. However, you have chosen to believe the lies of psychologists.
People are not born with a disposition that is impossible to change – even dumb animals are trained to conduct themselves in ways that run counter to their natures. If homosexuality is accepted because of sexual orientation, then there is no sensible reason to reject paedophilia or bestiality since these too can be regarded as sexual orientation.
Ken Scott, thank you for not coming to Barbados and please discourage others of your homosexual persuasion not to visit. Rejecting immorality is discrimination.
Unless you're a Democrat and then it represents votes.
Recently on FR there were several threads about AIDS in Africa, and it turns out that AIDS is wide spread among heterosexuals in Africa (and not in the US) for two main reasons, the most important one is that anal sodomy is very common, and that is a perfect way to spread not only AIDS but many other diseases as well. Another reason is that people - especially men - are often very promiscuous, and that is another great way to spread it. So if heterosexuals are not promiscuous and do not practice anal sodomy, there is no reason to for them to get AIDS.
Neither does celibacy. Next.
Celibacy does not result in premature death to its practioners. Counter?
Voluntary celibacy has tradionally been practiced thorughout history for religious or spiritual purposes, to focus the mind on transcendence, to limit earthly entanglements and maximize the service spirit, and to engender a kind of equal respect for all, a kind of non-exploitive mentality. There are monks, nuns, hermits and renunciates in most traditions of differing spiritual and religious paths, and celibate marriages. People who are atheists will not see the value of this, but others may.
You don't need to speak for Him, His words are crystal clear in condemning not only same sex sodomy, but other kinds of sexual immorality as well. Not only in the Bible but Vedic (Hindu) scriptures, Jewish scripture, and even Budddhist moral teachings.
Gay people are an expression of our evolution and civlization--based on sociobiological interpretation.
That is the opinion of some moral relativist humans beings - and humans are subject to these four defects:
1. Cheating or lying tendency.
2. Tendency to commit mistakes.
3. Tendency to believe what is not.
4. Imperfect senses (inlcuding mind).
So there you have it.
Can you cite some historical sources? What about the desert Fathers (and some desert Mothers)? They were celibate hermits, and in the 3rd century and maybe even 2nd.
One reason we are human is that we repress easy gratification, and have to work for it. Still, our more natural cousins enjoy cheap and easy sex, while the state of repression is unnatural.
Since you admire the monkey behavior so much, you will likely be one in your next life - and get to "enjoy" the chimpanzee life that so attracts you.
It serves as catalyst for exposing bigots and other small minded people. If these people did not have homsexuality to expose their demons, we might not know which of our neighbors and associates were dangerous.
Actually those words aptly describe the homo-nazis and their lawyers who are very very busy "rammin and crammin" their sick agenda down our throats via legislated laws and the courts. Conservatives are merely trying to protect ourselves from their crowbars.
Actually those words aptly describe the homo-nazis and their lawyers who are very very busy "rammin and crammin" their sick agenda down our throats via legislated laws and the courts. Conservatives are merely trying to protect ourselves from their crowbars.
Actually those words aptly describe the homo-nazis and their lawyers who are very very busy "rammin and crammin" their sick agenda down our throats via legislated laws and the courts. Conservatives are merely trying to protect ourselves from their crowbars.
Since you keep bringing up this topic, I'll set you straight. According to Ayurveda (ancient - and currently practiced - medical sciece of India, source of Unani (Arabic) and Greek medicine) states that practice of masturbation leads to mental imbalance and if practiced excessively, to psychosis. I'd say you're the poster boy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.