Skip to comments.
Vote On Gay Bishop Delayed; Allegations Surface
nbc4.com, Minneapolis ^
| August 4, 2003
Posted on 08/04/2003 12:58:04 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
The vote on confirming a gay Episcopal bishop was postponed Monday in light of allegations of pornography and inappropriate conduct, a church spokesman said.
A vote was expected Monday in Minneapolis that could make a New Hampshire clergyman, the Rev. Gene Robinson, the church's first openly gay elected bishop.
The spokesman said the postponement came after allegations emerged involving "touching" and "pornography." He declined to elaborate.
The church's House of Deputies has voted overwhelmingly to approve Robinson, who faces a final vote in the House of Bishops.
Robinson says Sunday's results make him feel "very peaceful on the inside" and "very humbled."
But the American Anglican Council, which represents conservative bishops and parishes, said it is "deeply grieved" by the results.
Robinson, a 56-year-old divorced father of two, has lived with his partner, Mark Andrew, for 13 years.
Bishops who believe gay sex is a sin say the approval of Robinson will weaken and divide the denomination and spark a bitter fight over parish property and funds.
But liberals say the threat has been exaggerated and note that many conservatives had pledged to break ties before over issues such as ordaining women but did not follow through.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bishop; church; episcopal; gay; gayporn; generalconvention; generobinson; homosexual; homosexualagenda; swishop; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-144 next last
To: MineralMan
"Life's for living."
Isn't that from a Massengill commercial?
To: Evil Inc
"Youd think the separation of church and state, the holy law per libs, would prevent the govt meddling. I believe it is headed that way though, through coercion like used on the Boy Scouts."
Atheism is their Church. Sep of church and state is code for weaken the church and strengthen the state. Part of the all fronts attack on the middle class.
It's amazing to me that a judge could take away the camp of the Scouts illegally UNLESS they deny God and bend over for the gay agenda. Meanwhile, the Moooslim camp is embraced. I like the Times articles from Iraq that extoll this holy city, that holy mosque, that holy ayatollah with a reverence. At the same time, they attack and destroy everything Christian, implying that Christianity must be somehow defeated. I am not even religious, but I know fascism when I see it.
I am not concerned about Al Qaeda- we can trash them at anytime militarily. I am concerned with fascist leftists trying to undermine every institution in this country. It borders on conspiracy and it is no longer subtle. Leftists like hillary are in our face with their aggression. Either I am paranoid or this is the most serious issue domestically since the Civil War. More depressingly, the repubs are pretending that nothing is happening. Hillary's speech the other day called for the elimination of states rights. Federal law would be generated basically to replace the states rights, including loose interpretations of the Constitution. It scared the sh** out of me.
I am personally at the point where if faced with a confrontation whereby my freedom is usurped by govt, I will not back down if attacked.
All roads are leading to the end of the Constitution as we know it and the usurpation (word?) of "I".
<<< paranoid rant off
To: dandelion
Yup, it's hard to explain, but I'll keep trying. I know what agnostics and atheists feel, for I used to be one... no one but God could have changed my mind, and yet He did. Ain't that the truth! And how little I deserved it, and how thankful I am.
103
posted on
08/04/2003 4:19:21 PM PDT
by
ImaGraftedBranch
(Education starts in the home. Education stops in the public schools)
To: MineralMan
It's a mistake to believe that an atheist does not know your religion's scriptures. Yes. For even the Devil can quote scripture, as it is written when Satan used the Word to try to tempt Christ. You are familiar with that, aren't you? Think hard before replying.
No....you didn't THINK about what I said. Take a minute and reread it, before moving to the next post.
104
posted on
08/04/2003 4:23:08 PM PDT
by
ImaGraftedBranch
(Education starts in the home. Education stops in the public schools)
To: MineralMan
Life's for living. For you, this life is all you will have then. You had better get busy living it, and stop wasting your time here. Nothing you say will prevent Christians from adhering to the Grace and Love of Jesus Christ.
105
posted on
08/04/2003 4:28:00 PM PDT
by
ImaGraftedBranch
(Education starts in the home. Education stops in the public schools)
To: MineralMan
Life's for livingNo, life is for worshipping and serving the Lord.
To: journey7873
No, life is for worshipping and serving the Lord. What kind of an egotistical freak creates a whole universe to bow down to him? If you saw that behaviour in a human being you would know he is a sick freak.
To: jlogajan
What kind of an egotistical freak creates a whole universe to bow down to him?What kind of creature would reject his Creator?
To: jlogajan
God created people, so that he would have fellowship with them.
It is akin to why parents have children. Don't they have children to love, and in turn hope that their children love them?
Does that make the parents egotistical? No, it makes them understand the bond of love between parents and children. Children instinctively love their parents.
109
posted on
08/04/2003 5:03:00 PM PDT
by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
To: Pan_Yans Wife
It is akin to why parents have children. Any parent that acted like the God of the Bible would be imprisoned for general inhumanity and child abuse.
I have to say this about humans -- on average they are far better than the gods they invent.
To: Pan_Yans Wife
The reason why I ask, is someone mentioned that their numbers were not very large, and thus the church should actually be called a sect. Referring to my very trusty (and long pre-PC) Webster's New Collegiate, the relevant definitions of "sect" are:
4. In religion: a A party dissenting from an establishment or parent church; a body of sectaries. b. One of the organized bodies of Christians; a denomination.
(a) doesn't quite apply, even historically, though (b) does. I think what your "someone" was reaching for was the word "cult" -- a very similar (and in some aspects overlapping) word, but one with rather more negative connotations.
The Episcopal church in America has (to my historically inadequate knowledge) not been a really big church percentage-wise, but it has until recently, certainly within my lifetime, been still large enough and influential enough to be accurately enough called "The Republican Party at prayer."
Those days are obviously long gone; twenty years and more ago, when I was still an Episcopalian, it was obvious even to me that they were history. But is the Episcopal Church of the United States of America (ECUSA) merely a cult? I don't think so. Not yet.
111
posted on
08/04/2003 7:10:27 PM PDT
by
Eala
(But IMHO they're working hard to become such.)
To: GOPgirl_VA
"I am Catholic and disagree with your point of view on God, Jesus and other religious issues, but I want to compliment you on the way you present your side. "
Thanks. I have no animosity toward religious folks. I just don't share their beliefs.
112
posted on
08/04/2003 7:14:43 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Bluntpoint
"Will Nogod greet me into his kingdom at my passing even if I proclaimed in life that Nogod was a figment of some other guy's imagination? "
Nogod cares about you no matter what.
Nogod welcomes all.
113
posted on
08/04/2003 7:15:51 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Bluntpoint
"Isn't that from a Massengill commercial?"
I have no idea. I don't watch commercials that don't apply to me.
114
posted on
08/04/2003 7:17:29 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
The Episcopal is world's second largest church after the Catholics (79 million?) but only comprises something like 3% of all US protestants, mostly on the east coast.
115
posted on
08/04/2003 7:18:06 PM PDT
by
MHT
To: ImaGraftedBranch
"For you, this life is all you will have then. You had better get busy living it, and stop wasting your time here. "
Yep, I think that's what I said. I am living my life. I don't consider time on FR as a waste, though.
116
posted on
08/04/2003 7:18:53 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: journey7873
"No, life is for worshipping and serving the Lord.
"
OK, then that's what you should do. My life is dedicated to other things. But you're free to do what you wish. I hope you'll allow me the same freedom.
117
posted on
08/04/2003 7:20:02 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: journey7873
"What kind of creature would reject his Creator?"
I would never do that. My parents are very important to me, and since they're both 79 years old, I take them even more seriously. How could I reject them. They created me.
118
posted on
08/04/2003 7:21:18 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
"God created people, so that he would have fellowship with them.
It is akin to why parents have children. Don't they have children to love, and in turn hope that their children love them? "
You can't have it both ways. My parents created me sometime around Halloween, 1944, when they had sexual intercourse. After a normal gestation of 9 months, I was born in July of 1945 at 2 A.M. on the 29th.
Your deity had nothing to do with it. My parents tell me that they were alone in their bed that night. Right after that, my Dad shipped out to Europe, where he flew B-17s in WWII.
No deity was involved. My parents are atheists, as I am.
119
posted on
08/04/2003 7:24:55 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan
My parents are atheists, as I am.How tragic for you and your parents.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-144 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson