Posted on 07/09/2003 5:02:46 PM PDT by Nov3
Carb Scare TacticsDiabetes Blog |
« More Timely Topics | Main
July 08, 2003Carb Scare TacticsU.S. News and World Report has an article in their upcoming issue (7/14/03) entitled: "The Diabetes Diet Wars: The nutrition advice given to most diabetics might be killing them" that discusses the great carb debate - again. Headlines like this really rub me the wrong way, especially for those who are newly diagnosed and may read this piece. The article does touch on some interesting points in the ADA nutrition guidelines vs. low-carb debate, but unfortunately leaves out critical information. Begin rant here... Here's the letter I wrote to the U.S. News editor in response to the piece: To the Editor: I found the headline "The nutrition advice given to most diabetics might be killing them" on your "Diabetes Diet Wars" piece to be irresponsible and alarmist. While I agree that the current dietary recommendations from the ADA deserve re-evaluation in light of the recent NEJM studies on low-carb diets and weight loss in type 2 diabetes (which were vaguely referenced in your article), the current guidelines are a far cry from killing anybody. Given that the consumers who are actively digging for diabetes information online and in their bookstores are often those who are newly diagnosed as type 2 and completely overwhelmed (I know, I get email from hundreds each month), this type of fear-mongering headline is uncalled for and designed not to inform but to cause panic. Diabetes is very much an individual disease, and I believe the ADA emphatically recognizes that when they state in their technical review on the subject that a primary goal of medical nutritional therapy should be: "To address individual nutritional needs, taking into consideration personal and cultural preferences and lifestyle while respecting the individuals wishes and willingness to change." In other words, while the ADA does issue evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for carbohydrate intake (and the key phrase is *evidence-based* - meaning based on the current body of knowledge from controlled scientific studies and subject to future change as knowledge evolves), these are only guidelines. Your article also fails to address several critical points of the debate. You quote Frank Vinicor of the CDC speaking to how high protein intake (a feature of popular low-carb diets) cannot harm anyone with healthy kidneys. This is absolutely correct, but your reporter fails to mention that diabetes is the number one cause of chronic kidney failure in America. Many people with diabetes *do* have existing renal impairment, and forcing their kidneys to process extra protein makes the problem worse. There's also the matter of carb quality versus carb quantity (otherwise known as the glycemic index, or GI), which should play a necessary role in this debate. A baked potato, for example, will raise blood glucose levels much higher and faster than a portion of fiber dense whole grain bread, even if the portions given have equal amounts of carbohydrates gram for gram. If anything, there should be a push towards including GI basics on smart carb choices in diabetes medical nutrition therapy. The ADA currently acknowledges the possible utility of the GI, but stops well short of endorsing it, citing a lack of current scientific evidence on long-term success, plus the supposed complexity of the method. In a world of exchange lists, carb counting, and blood glucose testing, however, the GI seems to be just a little more math for a much larger reward. Finally, exercise is an absolutely essential component of any treatment plan for type 2 diabetes. Exercise lowers blood glucose levels, improves heart health (cardiovascular disease is a major complication of diabetes), and improves overall well being. Inactivity is sometimes, though not always, the cause for a seemingly ineffective diet plan. ***************** |
Try Corona Light, add some lime and it is nice, refreshing and not much different from the "regular" beer. It has around 5g of carbos.
Another TV advice "to stay out of the sun, or use heavy screens" is pure garbage.
RIP Dr. Atkins and may you occupy that well deserved space up there, which "medical establishment" denied you here. You saved my life, thank you again!
When I gave up the coffee, I transferred to the diet coke. I was a large an addiction as the coffee. The caffein in the coke is as powerful as coffee. I would drink at least two 16 ounce bottles a day and it would affect me like the coffee. It would speed up my heart rate, keep me up at night and I found that I caught more colds.
I personally do much better on green tea. I enjoy the taste without sugar and have no more than two cups a day. No headaches, fewer colds. I am sooooooooooo glad to not be drinking coffee or cola.
-But to each his own.
Giving up the Diet coke is a tough one. Organic Japanese green tea worked as a good substitute for me. It is a very sweet tasting tea and has some very healthful properties. After a week of "withdrawals", I finally was able to go with out the diet Coke.
Thanks for the encouragement and suggestions, and the the time may be approaching on it's own. I find I'm opening a Diet Coke and only drinking about half...recently it's just not been tasting right.
Also some cucumbers with blue cheese dressing and added chunks of blue cheese. YUM!
Have you checked to see if you're alergic to Aspartame? My ex-wife and several other friends can't eat/drink anything with Aspartame as it gives them monster headaches.
You might take a look at Dite-Rite. It has sucrulose instead of Aspartame, no sodium, no caffine, no calories, no carbs. AFAIK, it's carbonated water, sucrulose and flavor.
Thanks for the info on Diet Rite. Sounds interesting. So far I have been pretty happy with my green tea though. It satisfies me so far. I seem to get sick less often with it as it has some good anti oxidents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.