Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson

Damn, I hate it when I've been had and I've been had big time.

In 1982, while I was working for Congressman Manuel Lujan of New Mexico, a man came up to a me during a gathering in Albuquerque and introduced himself as Terrance J. Wilkinson. He said he was a security consultant and gave me a business card with his name and just a Los Angeles phone number.

A few weeks later, he called my Washington office and asked to meet for lunch. He seemed to know a lot about the nuclear labs in New Mexico and said he had conducted "security profiles" for both Los Alamos and Sandia National Labs. Lujan served on the committee with oversight on both labs and he offered his services if we ever needed briefings.

We already had nuclear experts on the committee, on loan from the Department of Energy, and we never used Wilkinson for briefings but we kept in touch over the years. He said he had served in Vietnam with Army Special Force, worked for Air America, later for the FBI and as a consultant for the CIA. He said he had helped other Republican members of Congress I called some friends in other GOP offices and they said yes, they knew Terry Wilkinson.

"You can trust him, he's one of the good guys," one chief of staff told me. When I left politics and returned to journalism, Wilkinson became a willing, but always unnamed, source.

Over the last couple of years, Wilkinson served as either a primary or secondary source on a number of stories that have appeared in Capitol Hill Blue regarding intelligence activities. In early stories, I collaborated his information with at least one more source. His information usually proved accurate and, over time, I came to depend on him as a source without additional backup.

On Tuesday, we ran a story headlined "White House admits Bush wrong about Iraqi nukes." For the first time, Wilkinsson said he was willing to go on the record and told a story about being present, as a CIA contract consultant, at two briefings with Bush. He said he was retired now and was fed up and wanted to go public.

"He (Bush) said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said in our story. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

After the story ran, we received a number of emails or phone calls that (1) either claimed Wilkinson was lying or (2) doubted his existence. I quickly dismissed the claims. After all, I had known this guy for 20+ years and had no doubt about his credibility. Some people wanted to talk to him, so I forwarded those requests on to him via email. He didn't answer my emails, which I found odd. I should have listened to a bell that should have been going off in my ear.

Today, a White House source I know and trust said visitor logs don't have any record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever being present at a meeting with the President. Then a CIA source I trust said the agency had no record of a contract consultant with that name. "Nobody, and I mean nobody, has ever heard of this guy," my source said.

I tried calling Terry's phone number. I got a recorded message from a wireless phone provider saying the number was no longer in service. I tried a second phone number I had for him. Same result.

Then a friend from the Hill called.

"You've been had," she said. "I know about this guy. He's been around for years, claiming to have been in Special Forces, with the CIA, with NSA. He hasn't worked for any of them and his name is not Terrance Wilkinson."

Both of his phone numbers have Los Angeles area codes but an identity check through Know-X today revealed no record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever having lived in LA or surrounding communities.

His email address turns out to be a blind forward to a free email service where anyone can sign up and get an email account. Because it was not one of the usual "free" services like Hotmail, Yahoo or such, I did not recognize it as one (although you'd think that someone like me would have known better).

The bottom line is that someone has been running a con on me for 20 some years and I fell for it like a little old lady in a pigeon drop scheme. I've spent the last two hours going through the database of Capitol Hill Blue stories and removing any that were based on information from Wilkinson (or whoever he is). I've also removed his name, quotes and claims from Tuesday's story about the White House and the uranium claims.

Erasing the stories doesn't erase the fact that we ran articles containing informattion that, given the source, were most likely inaccurate. And it doesn't erase the sad fact that my own arrogance allowed me to be conned.

It will be a long time (and perhaps never) before I trust someone else who comes forward and offers inside information. The next one who does had better be prepared to produce a birth certificate, a driver's license and his grandmother's maiden name.

Any news publication exists on the trust of its readers. Because I depended on a source that was not credible, I violated the trust that the readers of Capitol Hill Blue placed in me.

I was wrong. I am sorry.

© Copyright 2003 by Capitol Hill Blue


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 200307; 20030709; 20yearsofsuckerhood; admiralboorda; afoolandhissources; andstillnonames; apology; batboy; beatitdoug; bush; capitalhillblue; capitolhillbs; ccrm; chb; chrissteele; chump; cia; corn; correction; corrrection; coupplots; davidcorn; debkaneedsdoug; dougthompson; fraud; gocheckcaponesvault; hoax; inaccuracies; iraq; itsalongroadbackdoug; keywordsgohere; laughingstock; leavefrdoug; lies; longwalkshortpier; losalamos; loseyourdayjob; lostcredibility; makesthenytlookgood; marcash; markash; meaculpa; media; mediabias; nosoupforyou; notreadyforprimetime; rankamateurmistake; retraction; ruinedpermanently; salonishiring; sandia; sandianationallab; scoop; steeledossier; suuuuuucker; terrancejwilkinson; terrancewilkinson; thescoopthatwasnt; tookthedougforawalk; truthout; uranium; whosthefraud; wilkerson; wilkinson; wilkinsonsbitch; wmd; yourestilllyingdoug; youvebeenowneddoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
To: surelyclintonsbaddream
Ping!
661 posted on 07/10/2003 1:46:58 AM PDT by scott7278 ("If I'm not back by dawn -- call the president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: Spidey
"Yes, this seems to be a familiar pattern from Mr. Thompson of writing hate articles about the White House and then apologizing when he can't back it up."

In reading through this thread and the links - I just thought the same thing.

Looks like a new ploy to create distrust of the Bush administration. Throw out lies, then come up with an elaborate reason for the error. Of course, the impression and the junk has been thrown into the media mill - any retractions are ignored when it can be used to hurt Bush. Yet, how can the author be at fault - he apologized for his erratic efforts. In fact, he receives accolades about his honesty.

I am not impressed with Mr. Thompson. Too quick to sprout off, too lax in verification, too willing to destroy the reputation of George Bush.

Another thing. Does anyone really believe that a person sets up a phony id and persona for 20 years to get in a propaganda lie against a GOP president to come along somewhere in the future?




662 posted on 07/10/2003 1:53:51 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Right you are ! It's long past time, that all FREEPERs see Doug for exactly who and what he is; a liar, a fraud, and a weasel.
663 posted on 07/10/2003 2:00:05 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; ATOMIC_PUNK; Howlin; William McKinley; Alamo-Girl; onyx; SpookBrat; ...
Thanks for the heads up, folks !! Wow !

And great work , W.M.!

A thousand pardons if you've been pinged or seen this already. Thanks.



Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.


664 posted on 07/10/2003 2:20:44 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Doug,

The scary thing about your actions is had Bill Clinton been the man you are, there would have been no impeachment. FreeRepublic would have been a footnote.

665 posted on 07/10/2003 2:26:32 AM PDT by Glenn (What were you thinking, Al?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
If I am not mistaken, Cap said that the guy who ran the editorial in the NYT was not asked by the VP to look into the uranium story.

This is another huge story then.

Excellent that you took note. Anymore details ?

666 posted on 07/10/2003 2:57:47 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Bush has been slimed in a big way and his character questioned. Now we see the story was picked up and printed elsewhere.

This was a matter of discussion last night on a long distance phone call

Yes, the original story will have legs, while the correction will have to be advocated for and explained again and agian.

667 posted on 07/10/2003 3:19:30 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
...the mystery "source" could be Deepthroat 2, or a clever, cynical journalistic stalking creation horse for one said...Doug Thompson?

I believe this nails it.

He made up the original story and the so-called Terrance J. Wilkenson.

He's much too volatile for a journalist.

Must be a hormone thing.

668 posted on 07/10/2003 3:42:41 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
bttt
669 posted on 07/10/2003 4:03:33 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; ClancyJ
bttt
670 posted on 07/10/2003 4:04:30 AM PDT by metesky ("Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
You are asking what I think, but I suspect my answer would get taken (perhaps not by you) as being what is true.

I do not at this time know what is true.

I suspect, however, that at this point Thompson is telling the truth now.

671 posted on 07/10/2003 4:04:50 AM PDT by William McKinley (From you, I get opinions. From you, I get the story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: Rivendell; Molly Pitcher; Miss Marple
fyi...
672 posted on 07/10/2003 4:21:27 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
So, Pitt registered truthout.org on September10, 2001, the day before the WTC and Pentagon were hit and thousands died, uses the site to try to damage a US president, and then goes on to coauthor a book by a former UNSCOM inspector who's been carrying Iraqi water since at least 1999, a perv inspector who has admittedly accepted money from an Iraqi-American who happens to be one of Hussein's supporters? And then Pitt puts all of his efforts into opposing the strikes on both Afghanistan and Iraq? Ritter has his handler; maybe Ritter is Pitt's handler. Wonder how he gets paid?

In Bayer stock.

Cipro (Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride) Tablets, IV Solution, IV in 5% Dextrose, IV in 0.9% Saline, and Oral Suspension Company: Bayer Corporation Application No.: 19-537/S38, 19-847/S24, 19-857/S27, 19-858/S21, & 20-780/S8 Approval Date: 8/30/2000

You've just connected the dots between Saddam - 9/11.

673 posted on 07/10/2003 4:23:27 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thus I am unwilling to allow Free Republic to be used to damage Bush or ANY of the Republicans chances, especially with fabricated leftist propaganda. For this, I am labeled a traitor to the conservative cause. So be it. Come hell or high water I'm sticking to my guns on this one. The Democrats are NOT going to be allowed to retake control of our government any time soon and that's a fact!

You just know that the 'Rats are paying people full time to use this forum to damage Bush, since we're the most credible and widely-read conservative forum. ;-)

674 posted on 07/10/2003 4:34:53 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
I don't understand why it's taking more than 2 and a half years to get rid of the clintonistas in the judiciary.

Fred, why in the world do you think that the 40 Dems in the Senate are trying to control the 800 people in the federal judiciary?

They're trying to create an unappointed superlegislature that rules us for life. You know that. I've been following this issue since the Clintonistas tipped their hand back in the impeachment wars with "the Magnificent Seven".

Unfortunately, I believe the courts have gone past the "Dred Scott" point of no return in regards to their credibility.

675 posted on 07/10/2003 4:44:04 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Speaking of TLBShow...Where is he?
676 posted on 07/10/2003 4:48:03 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Gawwwwd I LOVE YOU!!!!!
677 posted on 07/10/2003 4:48:06 AM PDT by Neets (Stupid Sleeper Cells is as Stupid Stupid Sleeper Cells does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
He is at the Little Peoples site holding feets to the fire.
678 posted on 07/10/2003 4:48:32 AM PDT by Neets (Stupid Sleeper Cells is as Stupid Stupid Sleeper Cells does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
It's really depressing to think he'd been fooled for 20years by a trusted news source.
679 posted on 07/10/2003 4:50:52 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Dunno. Heard he got booted by JR hisownself. I'm still looking around to see what happened, but only cursorily.
680 posted on 07/10/2003 5:09:18 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,321-1,340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson