Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Barnes insults Nancy Reagan.

Posted on 06/27/2003 7:55:25 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55

Ok. So I'm watching Special Report tonight and the panelists are Fred Barnes, Mort Kondracke, Katty Kay, and Tony Snow who is in for Brit Hume tonight.

Tony puts up a couple quotes on the screen from Teresa Heinz Kerry.

When asked in a recent magazine article if she would use the last name Kerry on the campaign trail, she replied:

"Now, politically it's going to be 'Teresa Heinz Kerry,' but I don't give a s—-."

On her marriage to the less wealthy Kerry:

"Everybody has a prenup. You have to have a prenup. You've got three kids with somebody else, you have to have a prenup."

Then the guests commented on the quotes.
First Katty Kay from the BBC mentions all the great things about Teresa Heinz Kerry, and ignores Tony's question about the quotes. Katty mentions all the charity work she does, humanitarian work, etc.
Katty says...
"Well at least we know she's not going to be sitting doe-eyed every time her husband makes a speech. We certainly don't need that."

Mort chimes in...

"Well first let me say that I agree with everything Katty just said. But I've heard reports that Mrs. Kerry has been known to chew John out in public and just rip him to shreds in front of people, and thats certainly not very polite or becoming of a first lady. I also agree that we don't need a first lady who will sit there all doe-eyed everytime her husband makes a speech."

Then Fred Barnes retorts...

"I'm not sure how she will play out politically in the midwest but she seems ok to me. She'll tell you the truth, and more importantly she will tell her husband the truth. She won't be a wallflower first lady, and we certainly don't need another first lady like Nancy Reagan who would sit there doe-eyed every time her husband made a speech."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; barnes; fox; foxnews; fred; fredbarnes; kerry; report; special; teresaheinz; weekend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: hellinahandcart
Laura Bush handles herself just fine. So did Barbara Bush. But then, they are just ordinary people, not actresses.
81 posted on 06/28/2003 8:20:01 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
I really see no difference in demeanor between the three, when it comes to how they comported themselves while their husbands were making a speech. In fact, no one looks more "adoringly" at her husband than Laura Bush, yet she's escaped your opprobium somehow.

But then, they are just ordinary people, not actresses.

Gee, I thought your problem with Nancy was that she was a mindless, adoring, cheerleading appendage. That's what you said at first. Now it's because she's an actress (or was "acting")?

Liberals had the same problem with her husband. Who had a heck of a lot more experience than Nancy in that profession, btw.

82 posted on 06/28/2003 9:47:04 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Terp
>> it would be better to have a first lady who didn't stare at her husband whenever he made an apperance or made a speech<<

I agree with Fred. Especially when they get that fixated, glassy-eyed, slack-jawed Stepford wives look. Gives me the willies.
83 posted on 06/28/2003 10:02:15 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
You certainly seem to have a chip on your shoulder.

There is a wide range of possible things to do while listening to someone give a speech. Looking stupified, glassy-eyed and slack-jawed at the very sight of the man speaking is passe, in my opinion.

Smiling approvingly, with dignity, will do just fine.
84 posted on 06/28/2003 10:07:23 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
You certainly seem to have a chip on your shoulder.

Pot, kettle.

I don't care if you like Nancy Reagan or not, but if "smiling approvingly, with dignity" is your standard, Nancy met it. That is essentially all she did. If her facial expressions simply bugged you, just say so, but admit it was her normal expression. She had the same demeanor speaking on her own.

85 posted on 06/28/2003 10:41:28 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
In fact I remember her looking kind of doe-eyed and soft-focused while calling Raisa Gorbachev "a committed Marxist", and not meaning it in a good way. It's just her face.
86 posted on 06/28/2003 10:45:08 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Could you be any more ignorant?

Oh sure- I could believe in astrology, and plan my husband's activites around it.

Points for supporting her husband, demerits for errant superstition, particularly when it influenced his activities.

87 posted on 06/28/2003 10:49:12 AM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d
If the great Ronald Reagan loved and found comfort in his wife then she is all the more remarkably wonderful in my opinion.

The Reagan hating media played up the astrology thing - in the great scheme of his historic presidency Nancy's dabbling in it registers not even a bleep. Certainly a lot less troubling than let's say Hitlery communing with Eleanor...

88 posted on 06/28/2003 10:57:52 AM PDT by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Teresa Heinz "54" is trash when compared to the class of a Nancy Davis Reagan. Period.
89 posted on 06/28/2003 10:59:07 AM PDT by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr
I'm afraid Fred and Mort stammer because they are aging prematurely due to poor nutrition. I'm being perfectly serious.
90 posted on 06/28/2003 11:28:20 AM PDT by Havisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; All
I don't think they want somebody who gazes at her husband the way Nancy Reagan did, and other first ladies have."

I saw the segment. If Fred had only phrased it slightly differently, it would have not created this controversy.

He should have said, "I don't think they want somebody who gazes at her husband the way Nancy Reagan, ano most other first ladies have", it would have more accurately conveyed the point he was trying to make.

He wasn't dissing Nancy, he was dissing the way most First Ladies have pretended to hang on every word - the evil witch of the west wing 42 included.

91 posted on 06/28/2003 12:18:05 PM PDT by mombonn (Have you prayed for our President yet today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Teresa Heinz "54" is trash when compared to the class of a Nancy Davis Reagan.

Probably.  But wasn't Martha Mitchell a breath of fresh air?
92 posted on 06/28/2003 12:23:11 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: exit82
I'll tell the first two words that came to me: Hillary Clinton.

Precisely. She thought she was elected to something, apparently.

93 posted on 06/28/2003 6:23:49 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (There_are_no_spaces_in_my_life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
Teresa HEINZ kerry is a classless woman. Nancy Reagan has more class in her little finger than sh*t-woman ever considered having!!

Nancy's "Just Say NO"! statement was stunning to the left...they DESPISE her for her clarity.....and for the love of her adoring husband!!

94 posted on 06/28/2003 6:37:18 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Good for Fred! I'm one of the many who liked President Reagan and couldn't stand his wife. I'll never forgive her for bad-mouthing Oliver North days before the 1994 election. Both Nancy Reagan and Teresa Heinz can drop dead as far as I'm concerned.
95 posted on 06/28/2003 9:54:05 PM PDT by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.

96 posted on 06/30/2003 7:14:27 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Some day, if I am a very very lucky man, some woman might look at me with "doe eyes" like that.
97 posted on 06/30/2003 7:23:47 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
98 posted on 06/30/2003 8:13:57 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Thanks for setting the record straight.
99 posted on 06/30/2003 8:25:24 PM PDT by scott7278 ("If I'm not back by dawn -- call the president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
TIVO comes in handy sometimes. :)
100 posted on 06/30/2003 8:31:39 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson