Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ZOA CONDEMNS POWELL FOR IMPLYING ISRAELI SELF-DEFENSE THE SAME THING AS PALESTINIAN ARAB TERRORISM
IMRA ^ | June 27, 2003

Posted on 06/27/2003 11:20:52 AM PDT by SJackson

ZOA Condemns Powell's Remark on Terror

June 26, 2003 Contact: (212) 481-1500

Attn: NEWS EDITOR

ZOA CONDEMNS POWELL FOR IMPLYING ISRAELI SELF-DEFENSE IS "THE SAME THING" AS PALESTINIAN ARAB TERRORISM

NEW YORK- The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has condemned the statement by Secretary of State Colin Powell strongly implying that Israeli self-defense actions are "the same thing" as Palestinian Arab terrorism.

Interviewed on the Arabic television station Al-Jazeera on June 23, 2003, Powell was asked, "Can you explain the difference you see between legitimate resistance and terrorism in the Middle East?" Powell replied by saying that the recent Palestinian Arab drive-by shooting in which a 7 year-old girl was murdered "is terrorism." He then added: "The same thing happens on the other side when the response comes and innocent people lose their lives, young people on the Palestinian side."

ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said:

"Secretary Powell's remark could certainly be interpreted as meaning that since both Israeli and Arab civilians have died, the Israeli and Arab actions which caused those deaths are 'the same thing.' This is false and outrageous. There is no equivalency between Palestinian Arab terror, which deliberately targets innocent civilians, and Israeli self-defense actions, which never target innocent civilians."

"How and why someone dies is important. To say that Israeli and Arab casualties are 'the same thing' is like saying that casualties caused by U.S. forces in Afghanistan are 'the same thing' as the thousands of Americans murdered in the 9/11 attacks."

Powell Should Be Telling the Arabs That Their Violence is Morally Wrong, Not Just "Ineffective"

Asked by Al-Jazeera Television "Is there any legitimate resistance?," Powell refused to state that all Palestinian Arab violence is illegitimate. Instead, he argued that Palestinian Arab violence was not effective: "What has this kind of resistance achieved for Palestinian people, whether you describe it as legitimate or illegitimate, whether it is terrorism or resistance, whatever you call it, let me ask the question this way, what has it achieved for the Palestinian people?"

ZOA president Klein commented: "The Secretary of State should be telling the Arab world, loud and clear, in no uncertain terms, that all Arab violence against Israelis is illegitimate and immoral and must stop immediately, whether or not it 'achieves' anything."

Powell's Repeated "Cycle of Violence" Remarks Implies Moral Equivalency Between Terrorists & Israel

In his remarks to Al Jazeera Television, Powell repeatedly referred to Palestinian Arab terrorism and Israeli self-defense action as "the cycle," as if the two are morally equivalent. Similarly, Powell said on June 22, 2003: "I regret that we continue to find ourselves trapped in this action and counteraction, provocation and reaction to provocation."

ZOA president Klein said: "The term 'cycle of violence' implies a moral equivalency between Arab terrorism and Israeli self-defense. Would Secretary Powell describe America's fight with Al Qaeda as a 'cycle of violence'? Would he say that the only thing wrong with Al Qaeda terrorism is that it has not 'achieved' very much for Al Qaeda's cause?"

Another U.S. Official Spoke of Arabs' "Legitimate Resistance"

The ZOA notes that Deputy Undersecretary of State David Satterfield, who has been sent to Israel as one of the leaders of the U.S. team monitoring implementation of the Road Map, has made statements describing some Arab terrorism as legitimate "resistance." While touring southern Lebanon in December 1998. He was asked by reporters about attacks launched by Hezbollah against Israel. (Hezbollah is on the U.S. list of terrorist groups; its attacks include the 1983 car-bomb massacre of 241 Marines in Lebanon.) According to the Arab newspaper Al-Nahar (Dec. 4, 1998), he replied: "We make a distinction between resistance and terror. We don't think that this resistance is terrorism." When a correspondent for the Journal of Counterterrorism asked the State Department for its response, a spokesman "refused to answer whether Satterfield's comments were in line with State Department policy or not." He did not deny that Satterfield made the statement. (Vol.6, No.2, p.26)


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/27/2003 11:20:52 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
All Hail the Arabs!
2 posted on 06/27/2003 11:23:52 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

=============================

Clearly Secretary Powell sings to an Arab drummer when he's on Al Jazeera.

3 posted on 06/27/2003 11:26:27 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
There's considerable difference between intentional, deliberate and accidental, regrettable.
4 posted on 06/27/2003 11:47:06 AM PDT by freedom9 (Nature will not tolerate the unnatural)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom9
Didn't look like Powell made that distinction.
5 posted on 06/27/2003 11:55:04 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Veni Vidi Velcro (I came, I saw, I stuck around :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: lilDuce
Actually, there would be no war if the palis would have just accepted the land and support that Israel has offered them more than once -- or if they had taken the state created for them in 1948.

The moral equivalence that you're placing on both sides is appalling in that it's no different than those who condemn both the arsonist and the fire fighter.

The palis fight not to gain freedom and statehood, which have been repeatedly offered to them, but to attempt to annihilate the Jews. In other words, they do not *have* to fight for survival -- and that's why your analogy is fatally flawed.

Another major flaw is that your examples, for the most part, don't explicitly target civilians, as the palis do. If you can't see the difference between ambushing soldiers and blowing up buses full of schoolkids and grandparents, then that's really quite sad.

But it's very big of you to not condone acts of terror.

I apologize if I didn't engage in ad hominems or any other type of personal attack which would have given you reason to shrug and complain that your opponents are irrational and engage in nastiness and personal attacks, but you just ain't worth it.

7 posted on 06/27/2003 12:59:05 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
In case you weren't having enough fun in certain other threads, check out #6. < smirk >
8 posted on 06/27/2003 12:59:45 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda
Ha! I was just about to *ping* you over here, my friend! Good work! :)
10 posted on 06/27/2003 1:06:19 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lilDuce
Like any other rational human being, I do not condone the acts of terror but at the same time I can understand them.

In your understanding what are the Arabs fighting for? The buzz word "occupation" is not valid. The label "refugee" was never valid when applied to Arabs. The Arabs only reason for terrorism in the middle east is to kill Jews, period. I personally see that as terrorism and ethnic cleansing. The Jews have more reason to resort to these tactics than the Arabs. Considering the support of the entire Arab world against little-bitty Israel I don't see vast superiority except in culture and discipline.
11 posted on 06/27/2003 5:04:14 PM PDT by BabsC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; MeeknMing
"Clearly Secretary Powell sings to an Arab drummer when he's on Al Jazeera."

Prepare yourselves - the wrath of God will befall America like never in our history if Bush continues to send spies (Powell) into the camp of Israel.

The santioning of homosexuality by the highest legal authority in the land (USSC) has opened wide the gates of hell against America.

Have you noticed the increase of floods, tornadoes, droughts, plagues, pestilences coming on America?

If America keeps up the taking away of covenent lands from Israel - ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE!

Laugh if you must, but it won't be funny.

12 posted on 06/27/2003 7:53:17 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Powell acts like a politician in all circumstances, pandering to all interest groups. The terms right and wrong only apply to whether people will vote for him in the future.
13 posted on 06/28/2003 3:04:32 AM PDT by FreeReporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Powell represents the views of the State Department, which are most often not the views of the administration. The State Department envisions a very different world for America - one in which I don't want to live - than the one envisioned by President Bush and the administration. So it has been for a long time. The State Department opposed Ronald Reagan's activities in the Cold War, opposed Kennedy's Cuba embargo,etc.
14 posted on 06/28/2003 8:05:39 AM PDT by Tom Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
moral equivalence

Filthy words. *Wrong* words. Grr, how I hate the moral-equivalenciers.

15 posted on 06/29/2003 10:08:59 AM PDT by Kip Lange ("And yet it moves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
Just to put myself in the crossfire for a moment, saying you "understand" the acts of terror does not automatically make you a "moral equivocating traitor". Saying you understand the acts of terror and they're the same as what the US does abroad, or that kind of bs, is...bs...just making the distinction. One can understand blind militant Islamic rage quite easily. Why do we keep blathering about needing to understand it? We all understand it very well. Those pictures are very illustrative. :-)
16 posted on 06/29/2003 10:11:27 AM PDT by Kip Lange ("And yet it moves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kip Lange
Grr, how I hate the practioners of moral equivalence.
17 posted on 06/29/2003 3:12:59 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; adam_az; LarryM; American in Israel; ReligionofMassDestruction; ...
The title speaks for itself.
18 posted on 06/30/2003 11:19:50 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Interviewed on the Arabic television station Al-Jazeera on June 23, 2003, Powell was asked, "Can you explain the difference you see between legitimate resistance and terrorism in the Middle East?" Powell replied by saying that the recent Palestinian Arab drive-by shooting in which a 7 year-old girl was murdered "is terrorism." He then added: "The same thing happens on the other side when the response comes and innocent people lose their lives, young people on the Palestinian side."

At one time I really liked Powell.  Over the years I have come to see a completely different side of the man.  He is unfit to hold the office of Secretary of State.

Does he also seek to equate collateral damage during our military efforts to be terrorism?  Mr. Powell, place you resignation on the desk by morning.

19 posted on 06/30/2003 12:09:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Vote RIPublican in 2004: Socialism's kinder gentler party: "We will leave no wallet left behind!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson