Skip to comments.
An INSANE situation up in Waltham, Massachusetts
Conservative Alerts.Com ^
| Chuck Muth
Posted on 06/16/2003 3:21:35 PM PDT by webber
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-316 next last
1
posted on
06/16/2003 3:21:35 PM PDT
by
webber
To: webber; *Homeschool_list
Bookmark bump to make some phone calls ...
2
posted on
06/16/2003 3:26:35 PM PDT
by
coloradan
To: webber
3
posted on
06/16/2003 3:29:45 PM PDT
by
jgrubbs
To: webber
I would mostly agree with this. I guess at some point, if the parents so desire, they would take some sort of standarized test to assess where their kids are in relation to other kids of their age. But, nobody should be able to force them to do it, if they don't want to.
4
posted on
06/16/2003 3:30:44 PM PDT
by
rs79bm
(The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
To: coloradan
I've had it with these nut cases.
Do you know that society has an interest in everyone vacinating their children? Can you handle that?
Also education. Is that too oppressive? Just take the standardized tests and shut up!
But no, people want to thumb their noses at society, the society that provides safety and decent neighbors, and police and fire departments, and then all of FR has to mail endless petitions for someone to have the luxury of living in the US and flaunting the few obligations put on a parent, by the state, for his child.
(Home schooling, yes, answering to no one, no.)
5
posted on
06/16/2003 3:34:28 PM PDT
by
Sarah
To: Sarah
It takes a village, eh Sarah?
6
posted on
06/16/2003 3:40:26 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
To: webber
They should really consider getting the heck out of Massachussetts at some point. Its no place for a free person to live.
7
posted on
06/16/2003 3:42:02 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: webber
Interesting situation. One the one hand, we don't want "the state" especially as represented by social workers to decide to just take custody of kids because they don't like the fact that the parents haven't had their kids take a standardized test. On the other hand, we don't want some nut cases deciding that home schooling means they can keep their kids pig ignorant so that all they are fit for when they are adults is welfare and crime.
While I am in no way sympathetic with the state, most home schoolers are happy to take standardized test because they consistently show how much better educated they are than the publicly schooled kids. And face facts -- if you want to get into college after home schooling (well, the vast majority of colleges especially if you want to pursue a real degree) you are going to have to take standardized tests to get in.
To take the position that homeschoolers are exempt from standardized testing (which is the least intrusive way for a state to determine that, yes, the kids are actually being educated instead of watching the cartoon channel all day) is like saying "heck, I'm a good driver, I don't need no stinkin' license, so I ain't gonna get one!" Well, yeah, maybe you are a good driver, and maybe you aren't, but if you are going to be on the roads with the rest of us we would like more than just your word on it!
8
posted on
06/16/2003 3:46:39 PM PDT
by
dark_lord
(The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
To: webber
This isn't about education. It's about control.
Not quite. It's about control of education, and as you correctly note, the minds of children. The fascists are getting anxious, since these matters have to be decided one way or another for society as a whole soon. The educrat statists know the jig is up.
To: webber
Seeing as private school students do not have to take these tests in Massachusetts, it is beyond bizarre that this can happen. The parents should maybe connect with a private school and do the homestudy through them. Or, maybe a clever lawyer could get the parents defined as a private school.
I think there might be something in the home-school laws that gives the schools some rights to test the students and some obligations to let those students be involved in activities and maybe some courses. The testing goes both ways. There have been school systems that have been seriously embarrassed when home schooled students get the best grades on Iowas.
10
posted on
06/16/2003 3:49:28 PM PDT
by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
To: webber
Let the lines be drawn. Thsoe who step across deserve what is coming to them.
11
posted on
06/16/2003 3:54:40 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problems solved!)
To: ElkGroveDan
A village of completely self absorbed people trying to prove some idiotic point, ignoring all the good they receive from others, to ruin a society, yes.
12
posted on
06/16/2003 3:55:27 PM PDT
by
Sarah
To: dark_lord
The government has no business assuming that the parents won't educate their children, therefore has no need for a "least intrusive" test.
If we don't assume basic good will and competency of most citizens, we assume a nation fit only for rule by an elite.
To: Sarah
Just take the standardized tests and shut up! And they let you vote ....
It's not about the tests anymore .... it's about the freedom to live your life away from a government intervention. I'm sure those kids can ace the tests.
The Amish don't go to public school and take stupid government tests; why can Mass. just leave them alone ?
Come to think of it, if I were these people I'd get the hell out of dodge.
14
posted on
06/16/2003 3:57:09 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: Freedom4US
The educrat statists know the jig is up.Hardly. They have just started to raise one eyelid just one millimeter.
Watch out if they even begin to feel threatened.
To: Sarah
Society this, society that....you might be a...SOCIALIST!
Do you know that what makes America great and unique is the concept of INDIVIDUAL freedoms and rights?
To: Sarah
Yes, so much good flows from the arms of government. Those ingrates have no appreciation of all the positive ways that bureaucrats can come into your home and make your lives better.
17
posted on
06/16/2003 4:01:49 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
To: rs79bm
The standaradized test that the Ultra-left school board would require the kids to take would cause them to flunk the test and thus showing in writing that the parents are unfit to teach their kids. The Ultra Liberal Public school system will pack their tests with PC questions, which of course home schooled children would answer "Incorrectly" in the view of the "Pubic Skoo Sistum".
18
posted on
06/16/2003 4:05:48 PM PDT
by
webber
(For Tyranny to exists, only takes good men to do nothing.)
To: webber
My wife and I home schooled both our daughters. We faced this same question and so we understand the reasons or fears behind home school parents not wanting their kids to take such standardized government tests (getting on a government list of some sort to later to be used for who know what purpose).
That said, it would be better for the kids if their parents side stepped the issue and had them independently tested/certified (what thousands of other homeshoolers do every year)....and live to fight another day on larger questions. Just because the government sees fit to use kids as political fodder, it does not mean parents should.
19
posted on
06/16/2003 4:10:37 PM PDT
by
kimoajax
To: webber
Any good home school parent should teach their kids how to lie on such tests. Tests are not given under penalty of purjury. In the end, what is the higher value? Being right or effective?
20
posted on
06/16/2003 4:13:05 PM PDT
by
kimoajax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-316 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson