Skip to comments.
A Democratic Party?: Anti-abortion Group Seeks DNC Web Link
Roll Call ^
| June 2, 2003
| Josh Kurtz
Posted on 06/07/2003 10:51:07 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Washington, DC -- The Web site of the Democratic National Committee links Internet users to the sites of 279 political and advocacy organizations, labor unions, religious groups and government agencies.
The list, divided into 28 categories, includes everything from
the Willie Valasquez Institute to the Oneida Indian Nation to the
National Association of Social Workers.
But the DNC is resisting adding a 280th link.
For almost a year, an organization dedicated to electing
Democrats to national, state and local offices has been pressing
the national party to add its Web site to the DNC's list of
linkable sites. The problem is, the organization is dedicated to
electing Democrats who oppose abortion rights.
So far, the DNC, whose quadrennial platform in 2000 included a
plank affirming the party's support for a woman's right to have
an abortion, has refused to respond to the query by the group
known as Democrats for Life of America.
"The request is under review," is all DNC spokeswoman Deborah
DeShong will say.
But Democrats who buck the party orthodoxy on abortion are saying
plenty.
"I think that the Democratic Party is the party of inclusion,
according to their mission statement - the big tent party," said
Carol Crossed of Rochester, N.Y., president of Democrats for Life
of America. "We've always embraced a more expansive
interpretation of human rights. Surely we can embrace a diversity
of opinions on this issue."
The organization is now turning to high-powered allies for help.
In the past month, Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) has written to DNC
Chairman Terry McAuliffe urging the party to add the Democrats
for Life link to its Web site. In addition, 17 House Democrats
wrote to McAuliffe defending the anti-abortion-rights group.
In their May 14 letter, the House Members said the DNC's refusal
to add the Web link amounted to "ostracism" of loyal Democrats
and contradicted the party's abortion plank in the 2000 platform,
which said in part, "We respect the individual conscience of each
American on this difficult issue."
"Actions speak louder than words," the 17 House lawmakers wrote.
But the DNC apparently does not know how to respond.
In this era of sharply divisive political discourse, abortion
rights groups have come to represent one of the Democratic
Party's strongest constituencies - and one of its best sources of
fundraising.
The DNC Web site offers links to seven organizations devoted to
the support of abortion rights, plus links to 48 women's groups,
most of whom are known to be defenders of abortion rights.
"We weren't asking them for a change of the platform," Crossed
said. "We were simply asking for an acknowledgment, a
recognition."
Inevitably, she likened the party's reluctance to include the Web
site link to the party's refusal to let then-Pennsylvania Gov.
Bob Casey (D) speak at the 1992 Democratic National Convention
about his opposition to abortion. The late former governor, who
went to work for anti-abortion-rights organizations after he left
office in 1994, has become the patron saint of the anti-abortion
wing of the party.
"I love the Democratic Party, but to be quite honest, I was
embarrassed about what happened to Bob Casey," Crossed said.
She argued that the Democrats may have lost Senate races in
Missouri, Georgia and Minnesota in 2002 because of the party's
absolutist position on abortion, which, she said, turned off
swing voters who might otherwise have been receptive to the
party's positions on other issues.
But a national Democratic strategist with close ties to women's
organizations called that thesis - and the anti-abortion group's
push for a Web link - "a teapot looking for a tempest."
"It seems to me like this is a fringe group desperately in search
of a little publicity here," the strategist said.
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: abortions; acttivism; democrats; dnc; politics; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; BeforeISleep; madprof98; miltonim; Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona; ..
ping
To: nickcarraway
For almost a year, an organization dedicated to electing Democrats to national, state and local offices has been pressing the national party to add its Web site to the DNC's list of linkable sites. The problem is, the organization is dedicated to electing Democrats who oppose abortion rights. So far, the DNC, whose quadrennial platform in 2000 included a plank affirming the party's support for a woman's right to have an abortion, has refused to respond to the query by the group known as Democrats for Life of America.
The democrat party has become the party of abortion, so the group in question have the proverbial 'snowballs chance' of being included int he already fractured, factioned party. To admit the group in question would be tantamoung to admitting the killing is contrary to issues of life, tantamount to admitting that the democrat party holds clearly duplicitous positions ... the unborn are not yet human beings thus they may be killed by a woman's choice--like removing a tumor; the unborn are due protection from killing because they are human beings.
3
posted on
06/07/2003 11:08:11 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: nickcarraway
"It seems to me like this is a fringe group desperately in search of a little publicity here," the strategist said. Fringe? Poll after poll shows a slight pro-life tilt in general and +70% opposition to partial birth infanticide. I hope the 'rat leadership continues their elite, absolutist views, it's a sure loser in the presidential election.
4
posted on
06/07/2003 11:16:16 AM PDT
by
roderick
To: MHGinTN
Leader of the Democrat Party
To: nickcarraway
THey just don't get it.
6
posted on
06/07/2003 11:18:46 AM PDT
by
Desdemona
To: nickcarraway
Kate has a dead look, doesn't she? Ghoulish, simply ghoulish.
7
posted on
06/07/2003 11:32:14 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: nickcarraway
"I think that the Democratic Party is the party of inclusion, according to their mission statement - the big tent party," No, that's the other party.
To: nickcarraway
The democratic party has a litmus test?
I am shocked, I tell ya, shocked.
9
posted on
06/07/2003 12:13:41 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
To: nickcarraway
Thanks for the ping
10
posted on
06/07/2003 12:31:11 PM PDT
by
firewalk
To: nickcarraway
"It seems to me like this is a fringe group desperately in search of a little publicity here," the strategist said. Well, a pro-life group would have to be on the fringe of the party of partial-birth abortion. But they're not on the fringe of the American electorate, as you Dem strategists will find out in the next few years.
11
posted on
06/07/2003 12:59:32 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(Sorry, I forgot to put a tagline here.)
To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Alouette; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; bulldogs; ...
2n
ProLife Ping! If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
12
posted on
06/07/2003 1:00:09 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(Sorry, I forgot to put a tagline here.)
To: nickcarraway; MHGinTN
I noticed the end of the url for that photo is "sp_image_katewelcome.jpg". She sure doesn't look welcoming does she? If that's the look she has for her supporters, what kind of expression would she have if she ran into me?
13
posted on
06/07/2003 1:02:52 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(Sorry, I forgot to put a tagline here.)
To: Slyfox
Chuckie Schumer thinks that if he is first to use the term 'litmus test' to describe a nominee to the judiciary (as in 'the republicans use a litmus test on abortion to decide whom to put forward), then he is immune to accusation that he is applying his pro-Roe litmus test tot he nominee. It is the crimnal enterprise democrats that use a litmust test ... look at the moderate positions of Souter and Breyer, bit Republican administration nominees (if memory serves), as well as others!
14
posted on
06/07/2003 1:02:53 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: MHGinTN
Chuckie Shumer goes to church with Julian Phillips and Julian dares to call himself an objective journalist.
15
posted on
06/07/2003 2:03:08 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(If they sneak in throw em out on their chin!!)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: nickcarraway
If the DemonRATS party were honest, their symbol would not be that jackass, (Even though it perfectly symbolizes their bone headed stupidity and stubbornness) their symbol would be a dismembered, aborted human baby. Their favorite agenda is defending the right of sexually irresponsible adults, to murder the innocent ones that their sex acts create.
Democrat politicians are in lock step on philabustering Judges appointed by Bush for only one reason-The slugs are convinced that Bush's appointees, would properly decide against Roe vs Wade and in favor of equal rights for all, under the law, as clearly set forth in the Constitution of the USA. The Dims oppose them just as they opposed Judge Bork-THey fail the DemonRATS litmus test for Judges. To please the Rats, a judge must not judge, but instead enable the Rodents murderous agenda.
Why Pro lifers would vote for DemonRATS, only God knows-or maybe he is waiting to hear their explanation too.
17
posted on
06/07/2003 2:39:10 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(DemonRATS-the party of baby bashing bullies and bulliettes.)
To: F.J. Mitchell
There are pro-life liberals just there are pro RKBA liberals. You should be able to be a good liberal and still believe in positions that any person who champions human rights for all and who believes in freedom can embrace. The problem is the collectivists who run today's Democratic Party reject both. The leaders of the party are not so much liberals as they are Stalinists. If you don't agree with the party line 100% as its articulated by them, you aren't a Democrat, period. And they wonder why the party keeps on losing ground. Some big tent party, that they can't accept differences of opinion among their members.
18
posted on
06/07/2003 4:00:48 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: nickcarraway
So much for the RATS dedication to "diversity."
19
posted on
06/07/2003 4:59:58 PM PDT
by
Kuksool
To: ConservativeMan55
Schumer goes to church?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson