To: Slyfox
Chuckie Schumer thinks that if he is first to use the term 'litmus test' to describe a nominee to the judiciary (as in 'the republicans use a litmus test on abortion to decide whom to put forward), then he is immune to accusation that he is applying his pro-Roe litmus test tot he nominee. It is the crimnal enterprise democrats that use a litmust test ... look at the moderate positions of Souter and Breyer, bit Republican administration nominees (if memory serves), as well as others!
14 posted on
06/07/2003 1:02:53 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: MHGinTN
Chuckie Shumer goes to church with Julian Phillips and Julian dares to call himself an objective journalist.
15 posted on
06/07/2003 2:03:08 PM PDT by
ConservativeMan55
(If they sneak in throw em out on their chin!!)
To: MHGinTN
I suspect we haven't seen anything yet with respect to RAT obstruction of judicial nominees. Just wait till the president tries to fill vacancies on the supreme court with qualified, conservative candidates. Of course, a little fantasy of mine is that the RATs will look so bad by that point for the stunts they've already pulled that furthur obstruction would be political suicide, clearing the way for the president to appoint those SAME individuals that they have so adamantly and unfairly opposed, to the USSC. The anguish that would cause the senate RATs would indeed be a pleasure to behold.
22 posted on
06/07/2003 5:29:31 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson