Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Friday, May 30, 2003

Quote of the Day by Grampa Dave

1 posted on 05/29/2003 11:42:24 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2; Mago
Log Cabin Republicans

I am switching syrup brands.

2 posted on 05/29/2003 11:45:31 PM PDT by chance33_98 (www.hannahmore.com -- Shepherd Of Salisbury Plain is online, more to come! (my website))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"On this point, Horowitz is dead wrong – there is not a scintilla of proof that homosexuality is a genetic or biological trait."

Uh, I wouldn't want to bet the house on that one. I'm afraid that when we make the argument against special rights for gays, we fail to do so in a thoroughly intellectually honest way. I do sincerely believe it to be a genetic abnormality, which probably accounts for the bulk of cases, and the other is a dysfunctional environment. The latter might be able to be corrected, but the former most certainly can't. I'm rather dubious of when I hear about "former homosexuals", which probably means they were either bisexual to begin with or are now simply living in denial (think fmr. Congressman Mike Huffington). In the case of genetic homosexuals, you can no more change your sexuality than someone mentally retarded can pretend to be a member of MENSA.

3 posted on 05/30/2003 12:33:16 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
SITREP
6 posted on 05/30/2003 8:13:51 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2; *Homosexual Agenda; Remedy; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
Thanks for posting the article.

Homosexual agenda ping.

Homosexual Agenda Index
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search
All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

7 posted on 05/30/2003 8:25:06 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

But beyond that, we are also laying the foundation for a destructive future.

Judaism's Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism (and then Christianity) Rejected HomosexualityWhen Judaism demanded that all sexual activity be channeled into marriage, it changed the world. The Torah's prohibition of non-marital sex quite simply made the creation of Western civilization possible. Societies that did not place boundaries around sexuality were stymied in their development. The subsequent dominance of the Western world can largely be attributed to the sexual revolution initiated by Judaism and later carried forward by Christianity. The acceptance of homosexuality as the equal of heterosexual marital love signifies the decline of Western civilization as surely as the rejection of homosexuality and other nonmarital sex made the creation of this civilization possible.

Texas Phys.Resource Council, Christian Med. & Dental Association, Catholic Med.Association Sodomy is an efficient method of transmitting STDs. And regardless of the reason, same-sex sodomy is far more effective in spreading STDs than opposite-sex sodomy. Multiple studies have estimated that 40 percent or more of men who practice anal sex acquire STDs. In fact, same-sex sodomy has resulted in the transformation of diseases previously transmitted only through fecally contaminated food and water into sexually caused diseases primarily among those who practice same-sex sodomy.

11 posted on 05/30/2003 8:50:44 AM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
This article makes it even more clear why homosexual activists are pushing so hard to SHOVE their horrid agenda down everyone's throats. They want to abolish all remnants of right and wrong in society. What can be more wrong, painful or destructive than homosexual behavior in its most extreme forms?
Nothing (not counting abortion and it's interesting to note that homo-activists are often very vocal abortion supporter fanatics, although they never have children) except bestiality, pedophilia or cannibalism. But (see recent article) those are going to be part of the agenda too.

By trying their hardest to destroy absolutes of morality, they are trying to "kill" God. They can't touch Him, but they can destroy people. It is tragic, it is shameful, and we can't let it happen.
12 posted on 05/30/2003 8:54:39 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Conservatives have been scared into believing that there really is something about homosexuality that is uncontrollable or inherent in genetic or biological make-up to cause these people to behave in this manner.

I agree with everything McCullough says, save this.

From where I sit, it seems to me are indeed scared. But of something else, specifically the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, or GLAAD. It is these people who have consistently gone after people over the slightest thing, and Hollywood/TV news heads don't think twice about kow-towing to their every need, to the point where these homosexual anti-First Amendment activists can get a private audience with those on the high end of the totem pole just by asking.

There can be little argument GLAAD played a major role in the cancellation of Dr. Laura's TV show. They created their own little campaign, complete with website, designed specifically to remove Dr. Laura from the television airwaves simply because she does not agree with the homosexual agenda.

Now they have decided to go after Michael Savage. He has been targeted NOT for making "anti-gay" statements (although I am sure that is what GLAAD is saying), but for saying something else, which a regular listener such as myself has heard him say repeatedly:

He has said he is a sexual libertarian, in that he has a live and let live attitude towards homosexuals. However, he draws the line when children get involved.

Now unlike Dr. Laura, he is not taking GLAAD's assault lying down. He has said on the air there are statements being attributed to him that he never said, and these are being used in an attempt to keep him from making a living. Savage has said he will sue if they do not knock it off. And true to form, a website not affiliated with GLAAD but nevertheless involved in the campaign to silence Savage has been served.

A visual response from a sister site shows the defendants think this is some kind of a joke. But Michael Savage is not laughing. And soon, neither will they.

And since this sister site has been kind enough to provide a space where you can e-mail all his sponsors at once, why doesn't everybody here use it to let them know you support Michael Savage's First Amendment rights, and they should, too.

But I digress.

It's time we stood up as a nation and stopped GLAAD in their mission to silence everyone who disagrees with them that happen to have a microphone, a TV/movie camera or a printing press. Because if they get their way, there will be nothing to stop the homosexual agenda, which absolutely includes our kids, and don't you frickin' forget it!

14 posted on 05/30/2003 3:16:27 PM PDT by Houmatt (Real conservatives don't defend kiddy porn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The government's primary concern is punishment and growth. In other words, from a government standpoint, it does not matter if one is a pig or what sexual consumption one has, just as long as one is not a wild boar but a domesticated pig. That said government has also interest in that pigs do not eat their own feces.

Gayness is a fantasy and as when any fantasy becomes fraudulent when politicaly sold, gayness is fraud as it is today. That said, government may tolerate it just as long as it makes fat happy little pigs that pay their taxes.
19 posted on 05/30/2003 4:10:07 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remedy
This is one of the most brilliant essays I’ve ever read. Can you book mark it for future reference?
23 posted on 05/30/2003 10:52:13 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
How many canards can this author fit into 15 paragraphs?
24 posted on 05/31/2003 3:43:54 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houmatt; EdReform; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; saradippity; stage left; ...
Thanks for the pings. I'm trying to catch up with my pings after being gone for a couple of days.
27 posted on 06/01/2003 2:27:38 PM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Anyone find it odd that the spokesman for the Concerned Women of America is named ROBERT?
29 posted on 06/01/2003 5:19:21 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Conservatives have been scared into believing that there really is something about homosexuality that is uncontrollable or inherent in genetic or biological make-up to cause these people to behave in this manner.

Presumably heterosexuality is genetic and so is hemaphroditism. Why is it odd to suggest that homosexuality is genetic? Rarity nor society's approval have nothing to do with whether something is genetic or not.

84 posted on 06/02/2003 6:13:15 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
I think it would be interesting to study the genetics of politicians that have a mysterious 2% vote desire. It's a strange genetic malady that prompts them to alienate vast amounts of voters for the 2% of the population homosexual vote and causes Republicans to pander to illegal invaders to increase the Mexican vote 2%.
98 posted on 06/02/2003 6:41:01 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"...our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics or geometry; that therefore the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages to which, in common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right." --- Thomas Jefferson

165 posted on 06/02/2003 9:21:17 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
bump
183 posted on 06/03/2003 7:53:25 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
But I have noticed that when it comes to the entire issue of homosexuality, increasing numbers of banner conservatives are going soft on truth that has been commonly understood for thousands of years. That truth is this: Homosexuality is behavior that is damaging to individuals, to families and to society.

Yes !

187 posted on 06/03/2003 8:33:36 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Statement: "The 'gay' truth: Kevin McCullough on homosexuality dominating American politics."

Response: An inevitable result of egalitarianism and its pendant "tolerance." The social outcasts now moving into positions of authority.

294 posted on 06/08/2003 8:14:31 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson