Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Else is Sick of Hearing About Scott Peterson?
Me | 29 May 2003 | Me

Posted on 05/29/2003 6:41:57 PM PDT by annyokie

Am I the only one who is sick and tired of the wall-to-wall coverage of this case?

Rant on or flame on.


TOPICS: Announcements; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Free Republic
KEYWORDS: canyercable; chatchatchat; chatthestoryis; enoughisenough; everypeterson; faq; killyourtv; makeacrimeforum; mindlessvanity; oldnewsnow; shutupghouls; stoopidmedia; threadshouldbein; veyseries; wherestherealnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-368 next last
To: annyokie
I can't say I am sick of it because I haven't really heard that much about it. I watch Fox News mostly and they don't seem to be wall to wall Peterson? Local news is not at all concerned with it either. Must be heavy coverage on the West Coast? Since I am not following it- can anyone tell me if there is any merit to the claim's of the defense? Or is this guy guilty as sin?
61 posted on 05/29/2003 6:59:56 PM PDT by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Too much media - not enough news...

I'm both sick of the story AND concerned over this trial by media trend.

Not that I think he's actually innocent, but can this guy get an impartial jury ANYWHERE in this country because of this mediagasm?

62 posted on 05/29/2003 7:00:03 PM PDT by AngryJawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Could be worse. Donahue could still be on the air, talking about it. Or worse than that. charles grodin could still have his blab show, talking about it.

I, too, am sick of it.

63 posted on 05/29/2003 7:00:23 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks; Wheat; katze
Sorry if I had my a$$ on my shoulders earlier today.
This thread has made me feel better already. :)

FRegards,
CD

64 posted on 05/29/2003 7:01:19 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I'm in line with you on this one. Short of a CNN interview with a Clinton, nothing these days makes me reach for the remote quicker than the Peterson story.
65 posted on 05/29/2003 7:01:37 PM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Hard-core pornography would pull even bigger ratings. Are you suggesting they program hard-core porn in search of more money? Simply because it draws ratings is not a reason to broadcast it.

The Laci crowd is mainly women. If you're talking about drawing a male crowd I'm not sure how many would watch it as avidly day after day as this case. And I believe there is a restriction on hard core porn on TV.

As for "is it okay" ... may not. But who decides? Do you want to go out and legislate that no channel can cover this trial? No tabloid can be in business? Next thing you know, you'll decide that people can't some in restaurants.

66 posted on 05/29/2003 7:01:39 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
My therapist says I should cut way back on "news". This wall-to-wall Peterson coverage has me on Comedy Central faster than you can John Stewart.
67 posted on 05/29/2003 7:02:08 PM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
They've done alright without him....so far.

Well, they're 1 - 2 without him, and I attribute the one win a couple nights ago more to the Spurs' incredible (and fairly recent) talent for choking than to the Mavs's sans-Niwitski prowess. If it goes 7, I'd want the big man back in a big way.

Thanks for the link.

68 posted on 05/29/2003 7:02:13 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I'm not; I haven't declared him guilty like a lot of people on the forum and, I might add, I have been flamed for not thinking him guilty from the gates. So, every time news comes out I like to watch the ebb and flow of the Peterson threads.
69 posted on 05/29/2003 7:02:55 PM PDT by Porterville (Screw the grammar, full posting ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
New Jersey 2, Anaheim 0
Refresh: 30 Seconds | 60 Seconds | 90 Seconds | OFF


 BOX SCORE | PLAY-BY-PLAY
19:33 3RD PERIOD 1st 2nd 3rd T
Anaheim 0 0 0 0
New Jersey 0 2 0 2

TEAM STATISTICAL COMPARISON
Key:  Anaheim    New Jersey
Total Shots
   9
 13
PIM
   8
 2
Faceoffs Won
 25
   16
1st Period Summary
TIME TEAM SCORING DETAIL SCORE
No Scoring this period
TIME TEAM PENALTY DETAIL
6:10 Anaheim Samuel Pahlsson: 2 Minutes for Obstruction - Interference of Grant Marshall
18:24 Anaheim Mike Leclerc: 2 Minutes for Hooking Jeff Friesen

2nd Period Summary
TIME TEAM SCORING DETAIL SCORE
4:42 New Jersey Patrik Elias (Power Play)
Assists: Oleg Tverdovsky, Scott Gomez
New Jersey 1-0
12:11 New Jersey Scott Gomez
Assists: Oleg Tverdovsky, Patrik Elias
New Jersey 2-0
TIME TEAM PENALTY DETAIL
2:23 New Jersey Patrik Elias: 2 Minutes for Holding the Stick Samuel Pahlsson
3:19 Anaheim Petr Sykora: 2 Minutes for Holding Sergei Brylin

ESPN

70 posted on 05/29/2003 7:04:04 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: hole_n_one
Thanks! Go Devils!
72 posted on 05/29/2003 7:05:38 PM PDT by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Count me in!!!! I keep thinking that by the time it goes to trial, we will have seen interviews of the blades of grass in front of the Peterson Home.
73 posted on 05/29/2003 7:05:54 PM PDT by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
My bad.....I thought he was injured in game 4.
74 posted on 05/29/2003 7:07:25 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Wheat
Hey, it takes a real man to admit when he's being a jerk.

However, I want you to know that I am STILL sick of hearing of this case! :)
Thanks for your comments.

CD

75 posted on 05/29/2003 7:07:27 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Me.
76 posted on 05/29/2003 7:07:49 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
NJ 3
ANA 0
15:38 3rd Period

77 posted on 05/29/2003 7:08:17 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I always get Scott Petersen and Scott Ritter confused. Maybe we need a thread for Good Scotts.
78 posted on 05/29/2003 7:08:19 PM PDT by JoeSchem (Okay, now it works: Knight's Quest, at http://wwwgeocities.com/engineerzero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Apparently I am not alone in my Peterson Fatigue! LOL
79 posted on 05/29/2003 7:08:34 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
He won't be able to get an impartial jury. Most people think he did it anyway. These is going to be like another OJ trial. I see Fox News has chosen theme music for the Scott Peterson case. That is one thing that angers me more than anything! They choose the same music before they start talking about Scott Peterson. They did the same with Chandra Levy!
80 posted on 05/29/2003 7:08:35 PM PDT by areafiftyone (The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-368 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson