Posted on 04/22/2003 3:17:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
After listening to a couple of his major addresses, and conducting a lengthy, wide-ranging interview with him, I would say Gary Hart poses a unique challenge to American political conventional wisdom. And there seems little doubt that if he were to make a serious run, and if he got sufficient attention, he could - at a minimum - shake up the entire process. "I have a rather archaic view of history," he says during our talk. "You ought to qualify to run for the presidency before you run, not try to figure it out after you get elected - like in the movie The Candidate, where Robert Redford asks at the end, 'What do we do now?'"
That's easy, of course, to say if you have published a dozen books, established yourself as a Jeffersonian scholar and just got your Ph.D. in politics - as Hart did two years ago, from Oxford no less. But what is striking about Hart is precisely his seriousness in pondering the role and future of America way beyond the narrow, Rove-like calculations of a political operative. He proudly boasts of "writing every word" of the thick, major policy papers he presented over the last few months. And anyone who knows him wouldn't doubt the boast for a moment.
Nor is Hart's political posture so easily pigeonholed into the limited spaces that now make up modern American politics. Perhaps the best definition comes by way of one of his former advisers, who says, "Gary is basically a postindustrial social democrat." In Europe that might be easy to grasp. But what does it mean in American terms?
"I can boil all this down into two themes," Hart answers. "First is to restore the ideal of the republic. The second is to shift American culture from consumption and spending to investment and saving. The bumper-sticker version might be: 'We must earn our rights by performance of our duties.'"
That's one helluva wonkish slogan to run on. But Hart is deadly serious about it. He's written a trilogy of weighty books on the "restoration of the republic," and his novel I, Che Guevara, written a handful of years ago under the pen name John Blackthorn, envisions a Jeffersonian revolution in post-Castro Cuba. He now argues for a renegotiation of the social contract in which the American people would take on more civic duties in exchange for improved physical, social, economic and environmental security. It's a vision, he says, that America has been able to glean only fleetingly three times in the last half-century. "There was that moment when we were asked not what our country can do for us but what we can do for our country," Hart says. "And that changed my whole generation. Then there was Clinton's brief, too brief, mention of an AmeriCorps." The third incident, which Hart describes as a "massive missed opportunity," was a week after September 11, when George W. Bush said, "We are all in this together."
The economic and social rights won through blood and sacrifice over the last two centuries have made America a "hugely" better place, says Hart. "But we have lost the other side of the coin," he adds. "Participation, responsibility and ownership."
On that basis, he sketches out a political program that is no less than a hybrid of socially progressive ideas and small-c conservatism: national health care, children's and citizens' savings accounts, tighter regulation of markets and corporations, a national energy strategy, environmentalism, and radical campaign-finance reform. In turn, Americans might be asked to pay a consumption tax, he says, participate in community service and learn to scale down their lifestyles to something more compatible with finite resources.
(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...
I can see huge billboards now.
Hart's era was when I began to despise Democrats as just plain dishonorable--say one thing, lie about another, and then draw a totally unwarranted connection between the two.
He can't even be honest enough to say: this is my socialist program. It is a vast change from what America stands for, but I think it's best. The reason is because people who only read or hear the introductions will really flock to him.
I guess they believe him to be "brillant" as they do Bill Clinton.
Anyone for Jimmy Carter's malaise? If this one is emphasized, he won't go far--that speech was the beginning of the end for Jimmy and won't sell today.
Gee, and all this time I thought we were endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights. Silly me.
--- I got no beef with that. That's what FR is here for. But it's the dems who are digging faster on this hole we are in.
'We must earn our rights by performance of our duties.'"
"Rights" are not "earned" - they are inalienable, remember?
I'm all for doing our duty, but our duty doesn't include all the welfare-state crapola you have foisted upon us.
It's a tough choice, but I'm still another FREEPER for AL.
(That's SHARPTON, not Gore or Yankovic)
A regular Jim Jones.
I'll vote for Weird Al Yankovic before I vote for Gary "Monkey Business" Hartpence.
Regards,
What? This guy's got a button he can push or something? Oh, I get it -- the old command and control economy (cause people just can't be trusted).
We are too rich, that's the problem. Too much freedom to control our own destinies. We need the short leash, the era of limitations, the global village to get well. At least, that's the ever-recurring Demo message. Security over freedom, government 'guarantees' of benefits over real prosperity. Hart/Hillary would comprise a Demo dream ticket. (Course, maybe she wouldn't accept him as her VP.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.