Posted on 03/15/2003 10:48:51 PM PST by ItsJeff
150 acres of dreams dashed
Buyer now sought for super-collider site
By JIM HENDERSON
Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle
WAXAHACHIE -- The historical footnote will record that it was the most expensive dry hole ever drilled: 18 miles, $2 billion.
It was a cursed quest not for oil or gold or any other tangible resource, but for a brief glimpse -- through a window measured in billionths of a second -- at the creation of the universe.
It touched off a frenzy of land speculation, ignited delusions of quick wealth and long-term prosperity, inspired visions of this placid, North Texas prairie town, best known for its gingerbread homes and ornate courthouse, turned into a hub of international scientific commotion.
That was then. Now, a decade after Congress pulled the plug, what was to have been a superconducting super collider, capable of smashing atoms at near the speed of light, is just a plugged hole, seven drab buildings of assorted sizes and 150 acres of dashed dreams.
Ellis County officials would like to sell it and put the debacle behind them, but while potential buyers drop in occasionally, they have never been able to close the deal.
"It's pretty much a single-use facility," says Ellis County Attorney Joe Grubbs, who handles the legal work of disposing of the property. "One building is 28 feet wide and 600 feet long and it curves. There are not a lot of uses for that building. You couldn't even use it for a shooting range."
The county thought it was close to unloading the white elephant a few weeks ago. A Dallas businessman entered into serious negotiations to acquire the buildings and convert them into an antiterrorism training camp.
Like others before it, that deal fell through. The buildings, which were built to operate what was touted as one of history's grandest scientific experiments, are now near-deserted warehouses. Some county office furniture is stored in one. Mountains of boxes containing plastic foam food containers fill another.
"Everybody gets excited when somebody looks at it," Grubbs says of the property, "and then they are disappointed when a sale isn't made. After a few times, you get a little jaded."
After Congress killed funding for the program in 1993, the Department of Energy ceded nearly 10,000 acres to the state, which sold some of it to private individuals and parceled out some to the county and local school districts.
Rent from companies using the buildings for storage and for television commercial and movie production have helped defray the costs.
"It pays for itself," says County Judge Chad Adams, who took office early this year.
Still, the county is eager to unload the bland, brown buildings that are a dreary monument to what one scholar called a "super boondoggle."
"The SSC promises to do little more than provide permanent employment for hundreds of high-energy particle physicists and transfer wealth to Texas," Kent Jeffreys, director of environmental studies at the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., wrote in the spring of 1992.
Enthusiastically advocated by the Reagan administration -- including then-Vice President George Bush -- and embraced by Congress in the early 1980s, the super collider was designed to be a 54-mile elliptical tunnel lined with 11,000 superconducting magnets that would hurl atoms on a collision course for a small-scale replication of the Big Bang.
It would employ nearly 2,500 scientists and technicians and would cost what seemed like an affordable $5 billion. The Energy Department promised that other nations would gladly contribute to the cost for their scientists to have access to the facility.
Twenty-six states engaged in fierce bidding for the colossus, but passions in Washington cooled as the decade came to a close. The scientific community was divided over the value of the collider, and when Texas was chosen for the site, regional resentments surfaced.
"Politics is what killed it," says Keith Roberts, the Ellis County property manager.
Holly Davis, an assistant to the county judge, agrees.
"The government said, `Wait, this is Texas. You've got NASA and the collider. You guys have to choose,' " she says.
More likely what killed it was the debate over the scientific value and the cost.
By the time President George Bush signed the first appropriations bill for the collider in 1989, the estimated cost was approaching $8 billion, with no guarantees it wouldn't go higher.
And, that was a time when the country was facing tough choices. During the 1980s, the national debt soared higher than a space lab, and interest payments alone devoured a quarter of annual federal outlays.
Defending such a massive and controversial project, which promised little practical return, was becoming difficult, especially for Bush, who would soon have to renege on his "read my lips" pledge and go along with a tax increase.
Still, work proceeded in Ellis County. Scientists began moving in. Land was acquired, and work on the tunnel started. Land values shot up, and businesses jockeyed for a bite of the golden egg.
But there were a few skeptics.
"There was a lot of hope," says Susie Witcher, who works in an antique shop in Waxahachie. "But some of us thought it was going to be a fiasco, that we were going to get screwed. It was just too good to be true. I couldn't understand why they would put it here anyway. We're the fire ant capital of the world. Those things can get into a bank vault."
Feelings also were mixed in the community of Boz (population 200), just southwest of Waxahachie, where houses and farms and ranches were being acquired for the project.
The village vanished. Most residents went willingly, having exacted generous prices for their land.
Monnie Bratcher, eightysomething, became a local legend and is still talked about, several years after her death, when conversation turns to the collider.
She had a small farm where she had lived for 80 years. She had 17 cattle, fences, a barn and was close to the cemetery where her parents were buried.
"She wanted to die in her house," says Witcher. "She told them they would have to physically move her off her land, and they did."
Lon Robert Wakefield, who surrendered most of his 140-acre cattle ranch to the Department of Energy, also remembers Bratcher's last stand.
"The sheriff came out and moved her," he says. "She told them they were never going to finish it (the collider) and she was staying right there."
She was the last to go. Less than two years later, the project, 20 percent complete, was halted.
"There was some bitterness about losing their land," Wakefield says. "But most who went through this are dead and gone now."
After he sold his land, Wakefield, now 71, moved into town for a few years. He then returned to the country to settle on six acres, something less than a ranch.
He had a chance to buy back the land he lost, but he declined.
"Everything was gone ... the fences, the barns. I would have had to start all over," he says. "I'm too old for that."
Adams, the county judge, says local residents have recovered from the disappointment of the project's demise but would like to see the facility sold and put to profitable use.
Tentative offers for the property have ranged from $3 million to $8.5 million -- paltry sums in the scheme of what was planned here.
Still, most residents believe, anything would be better than storing plastic foam cups in a $2 billion warehouse.
"It needs to be used for something," Wakefield says.
Stop trying to get us all depressed.
he sounds suspiciously like "Marvin" (?), the robot in "Hitchiker's Guide to the Universe."
Instead they are working in Europe. This is a public sector crime.
Some questions won't be answered for decades that could have been answered quickly. Is it worth our public effort to understand the world as best we can? Now others are filling the gap, delayed, and it is not American facilities. We are not competing well among nations, not up to the level we need to sustain dominant preeminence.
Sounds like Waxahachie will continue to be a beautiful, nice place to live.
At least until the next bright idea comes along.
I know the feeling: I ate a sandwich at a Greek Pizza & Sub shop, my stomach was upset for a week....
:-)
Macaroni?
Explaining high energy particle physics to politicians must be like trying to teach, well, high energy particle physics to pigs.
I would explode from frustration.
yeah, that $40 billion dollar International Space Station sure was a winner, wasn't it? ><
Much better than knowing where the universe came from, or having a moon base, or other unimportant stuff like that.
Lol, look who got the zot. :P
I was all for it when I was younger. A shame it was canceled.
That is what keeps science interesting. Ansering the questions. If it creates more questions and answers then that means we continue investing in projects like the supercollider and motivates people to get more interested in the science. Using your logic, perhaps we should not have gone to the moon because it is a inanimate body in Earth's orbit.
I think you mean Project Mohole. I remember hearing about it in school.
Finding out what is deep within the Earth doesn't seem like the stupidest project to undertake, depending on the total cost. For instance the Russians have drilled the world's deepest hole and found valuable concentrations of minerals at great depths. As with all fundamental research, private enterprise doesn't usually show much interest until government funded research has blazed the trail and made clear where money might be made.
I was thinking an 18-mile long tunnel would be a great all-weather training facility for marathon runners.
Home Depot has purchased the Super Collider site to chop up and sell as fence post holes...
Strange and unusual circular underground restaurant. Call it The Circle, The Roundabout, Circa, etc. Fix it where the floor gradually goes round and round and call it The Carousel. Jet setters with private jets could fly in for very expensive dinners. It could be so expensive that people like me couldn't dine there, but we could work there. Dining, dancing in one of the buildings with entertainment venues. Imaginative lighting. Help me here . . .
A spa? Ideas on how to do a spa? An exclusive spa? Is there much water around? An airport nearby?
We live near a dam project that was supposed to be done about twenty years ago. The "endangered" pearly mussell or some such thing got in the way. They spent, I think, about $8,000,000.00 on the dam, scrapped that project, demolished the dam (which looked pretty far along), and now we don't live on a potential lake and aren't too sad about the lack of speedboats, jetskis and strange fishermen on our property to access the "lake". Now, we are close to the river on a hill overlooking it fairly closely. It just flabbergasts me how the government can be allowed to spend so much money and then just flush it all down the potty. It makes me think what taxes I pay are just an insignificant drop in the bucket. Hah! . . and the ironic thing in this dam business is that plenty of pearly mussells were found later in another area.
Depends on which direction it bends!
My point is that science has to compete in today's world by delivering useful results. Gone are the days where government trucks dumped money at the door to some dimly lit lair of theoretical physicists. Physicists need to understand that to pursue Grand Unification, they must also devote a few hours on multidisciplinary teams that solve contemporary problems.
As previous, I think the US was right to pursue the SNS and become the leader in neutron science over supercolliders and particle physics.
Where I think the US went astray was investing in NIF and letting ITER go probably to Asia. If anyone should be the lead in fusion research it should be us. We have the most to gain.
A better investment in neutron science would have been the original ANS design. We were ready to go with that until (Hillary) Clinton found out that it was a reactor (horrors!). So they switched to a more politically-correct accelerator source. As someone who has done neutron scattering work, it is my opinion that a steady-state, intense neutron source has it all over a pulsed source. Not to mention usable flux. Once you get 10 cm or so away from the target, the flux is down a factor of 1000. Not good when you're taking diffractograms that are on the order of hours of data collection time already.
Where I think the US went astray was investing in NIF and letting ITER go probably to Asia. If anyone should be the lead in fusion research it should be us. We have the most to gain.
The most promising one we killed (Clinton again) was the Integral Fast Reactor that was being developed at Idaho National Lab. That would have had immediate payoff, as well as developing a whole slew of related technologies (i.e., fuel reprocessing, actinide recycle, etc.). But, again, once Hillary got wind that it was a reactor concept that might actually benefit the nuclear industry, it was outta there faster than $h*t through a goose...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.