Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate passes Partial Birth abortion ban
Fox News website ^ | 3/13/03 | Fox News

Posted on 03/13/2003 7:19:50 AM PST by netmilsmom

This is a banner at the top of the Fox website. Thank God!


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pbaban2003; shamsubstitute
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-269 next last
To: Salamander
"Funny how Edwards and Kerry both managed to avoid voting on it, and therefore, any potential political 'stigma' associated with this issue.
With 2004 in mind....convenient, even."

Let's all make sure we CONTINUOUSLY let the public know that they abstained for NO GOOD REASON. THEY WANT TO PLAY BOTH SIDES OF THE FENCE.

I can hear them now at $5,000 a plate fundraisers: "I would have voted AGAINST it if I had been able to make it" and to crowds of moderate conservative 'swing' voters: "I would have voted AGAINST it if I had been able to make it".

I think the Clintonista regime has made me cynical.

121 posted on 03/13/2003 9:08:05 AM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
LOL! Delightful post! Thanks.

I think we do Asti Spumonte. I've liked a number of California blushes, probably too lowbrow for your taste.

Dan
122 posted on 03/13/2003 9:11:47 AM PST by BibChr (Gotta love these guys who are smarter than God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Pro-Life victory bump!
123 posted on 03/13/2003 9:12:28 AM PST by k2blader (Please do not feed the Tag Lion. ®oar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
"No, you were looking at a tally of YESTERDAY's Harkin amendment to the PBA bill that endorsed Roe v. Wade."

Sorry. I saw in further replies that I had the wrong floor vote.

124 posted on 03/13/2003 9:13:39 AM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: swheats
That's GREAT graphic!
125 posted on 03/13/2003 9:14:44 AM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Courtesy of animationfactory.com
126 posted on 03/13/2003 9:15:58 AM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
I want to see it, too. I live in NM. I know for a fact that Domenici has been in favor of passing the partial birth abortion ban for a long time. Binaman, on the other hand, is a drone for the RAT leadership. He will duck and cover when his ass is on the line with the NM voters, and a bill is assured of passage or defeat. Binaman is one of Daschle's key "heyboys".
127 posted on 03/13/2003 9:16:40 AM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
The legislation includes an exemption in cases in which the procedure is necessary to save the life of the mother

In a partial birth abortion, a baby is delivered nearly all the way except for the top of its little head. Okay.

AT THAT POINT (where the baby is almost all the way born)..... there are only two options: 1) Pop! - - out comes the last few inches of the living baby, or 2) Surgical scissors are thrust into the base of the baby's skull to facilitate removal of brain matter so said baby's skull can be collapsed. Then, Squish! - - out comes the last few inches of a brutally murdered, dead baby.

Can somebody please explain to me the difference between option #1 and option #2 as it relates to the possible endangerment of the mother's life?

Thank you.

128 posted on 03/13/2003 9:18:39 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Santorum voted against this.....I take it to mean that the "exception" clause was added....the one where he says that the partial birth abortion is left to the SOLE DISCRETION of the doctor....NO PEER REVIEW. He said that clause means that ANY ABORTION CAN OCCUR AT ANY TIME, AS LONG AS A DOCTOR STATES IT WAS IN THE MOTHER'S HEALTH INTEREST........he discussed this at length the other night.....why he was against this amendment with the ADDED EXCEPTION CLAUSE.
129 posted on 03/13/2003 9:19:47 AM PST by nicmarlo (** UNDER GOD **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
Maybe we should send "thank yous" to Senator Frist for keeping his word and making sure this came up ASAP.
130 posted on 03/13/2003 9:20:23 AM PST by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Can somebody please explain to me the difference between option #1 and option #2 as it relates to the possible endangerment of the mother's life?

No difference. If the mother's life was in danger the baby would be born by C Section and put in the NICU if necessary. Killing the baby on purpose is never a way to save a mother's life.

131 posted on 03/13/2003 9:20:34 AM PST by Terriergal ("what does the LORD require..? To ACT justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Correction: "I can hear them now at $5,000 a plate fundraisers: 'I would have voted AGAINST FOR it if I had been able to make it' and to crowds of moderate conservative 'swing' voters: 'I would have voted AGAINST it if I had been able to make it'. "

Geeeeez....I'm not as thought as awake I was....

132 posted on 03/13/2003 9:20:35 AM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Religion has nothing to do with it... If th child is viable outside of the womb, then to kill it is murder. Period...
133 posted on 03/13/2003 9:21:14 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks ("No I'm never gonna do it without the fez on... oh no...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
The left was so distracted by Iraq they didn't hardly even mention it :)

I doubt that. They just know they can twist the definition of "life and health of the mother" to suit their own pro-death ends.

134 posted on 03/13/2003 9:21:31 AM PST by Terriergal ("what does the LORD require..? To ACT justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
Clinton with a Yea no way.
135 posted on 03/13/2003 9:23:23 AM PST by Rightly Biased (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased
Clinton with a Yea no way.

Again, please read more closely. THAT's the tally from a Harkin amendment to the bill endorsing Roe v. Wade.

136 posted on 03/13/2003 9:25:48 AM PST by hispanarepublicana (successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Yup, I going to say something similar along those lines.
137 posted on 03/13/2003 9:26:39 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture (Most Americans favor RESTRICTIONS on abortion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased
Nay, she said Nayyyyyy (like a billygoat!)
138 posted on 03/13/2003 9:26:48 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
Sorry I saw someone ask for a roll call and there it was but it wasn't the roll call I was expecting to see,Sorry (hanging my head in shame)
139 posted on 03/13/2003 9:30:27 AM PST by Rightly Biased (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
And she smells like one too!!!
140 posted on 03/13/2003 9:31:17 AM PST by Rightly Biased (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson