Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unemployed at 62, his plight may be a sign of the times (Barf alert!)
bostonherald ^ | 3-11-03 | Margery Eagan

Posted on 03/11/2003 11:40:19 AM PST by Jimmyclyde

Unemployed at 62, his plight may be a sign of the times

by Margery Eagan Tuesday, March 11, 2003

Here in the living room of what feels like a cozy English country cottage - china-blue walls, hand-painted antique chairs, latticed windows and fine woods - it's hard to believe the once-comfortable occupants are down to their last $2,500.

Not enough to pay their $2,000 monthly rent and $1,200 health insurance, never mind food or heat or gas.

But that's the very scary story of North Easton couple Dick Wilcox, 62, and his wife, Michele, 56. Dick was laid off from his $65,000, mid-level insurance company job a year ago. He cannot afford to retire.

And as a nation obsesses over war, its politicians seeming to forget the crushing effects of a jittery economy, Dick Wilcox has joined the unenviable ranks of older, unemployed, white-collar workers who can't find another decent job.

``It's like all it takes,'' Dick Wilcox said yesterday, ``is one crack in the system and you can go from having a really good lifestyle to being literally homeless.''

To prevent that is why he's spent three months now, morning after frigid morning, at busy Canton intersections. He wears fat mittens and a hooded parka over a neat suit and tie. And like an upscale version of your average street corner beggar, lifelong, middle-class taxpayer Dick Wilcox stands with a mix of humiliation, desperation and defiance behind the 4-by-6-foot plywood sign he made in his basement. And he begs, too.

``I NEED A JOB. 508-238-3226.'' That's what his sign reads in big black letters. ``36 Yrs. Exper. Insur/Mngmnt.''

Dick Wilcox has dropped off hundreds of resumes at companies and office parks. He's sent out hundreds more online. He's had two interviews and not a single job offer near the $50,000 he needs.

Now his severance, unemployment, modest savings and pension are almost gone. Michele Wilcox, who raised three children and supplemented Dick's income with a home crochet business, brought in just $9,000 this year. Her small business is yet another victim, it appears, of a shrinking economy.

A year ago, the couple planned to help an infertile daughter finance an expensive overseas adoption. They'd hoped to replace a 12-year-old car. Now, even if both find $10-an-hour jobs tomorrow, they're on the brink of losing their home.

Dick Wilcox, who has a can-do, take-charge aura about him - and unique ideas on making older workers more attractive - says he's still a bit stunned by it all. ``When I first lost my job I said, `Well, it's not the end of the world. I'll go out and find something else . . .' I never expected . . . this.''

Here is the good and bad news. Last week, his story made the front page of The Wall Street Journal. Since then he's had hundreds of phone calls, mostly from other older laid-off workers who are discouraged, too, ``and practically crying on the phone,'' he says. ``Out of work nine months, 14 months. Unbelievable, terrible stories.''

But he's also had calls from other media outlets, including nationally syndicated radio shows, cable TV's NECN and two of the three big morning network shows: ``Good Morning America'' and ``The Early Show.'' But the morning shows keep delaying him, he says, because of war stories.

Meanwhile, he says, not a single politician has called. ``They'd much rather debate the war than talk about the economy because they don't have any solutions. They just keep promising the economy's going to turn around. . . Now they don't even say it anymore and we've got tens of thousands out of work.''

Although media coverage has led to at least one promising interview offer, Dick Wilcox is taking no chances. He plans to be out again tomorrow morning, the corner of Route 138 and Washington Street, where people have climbed over snowbanks to shake his hand or bring him Dunkin' Donuts. ``One woman tapped me on the shoulder with tears in her eyes. She said, `This is the gutsiest thing I ever saw anybody do.' ''

He says that when he first thought of the sign, he was afraid to tell his wife or children. He was embarrassed, scared he'd seem like a failure, like ``some idiot'' standing in the road.

Yesterday, Michele Wilcox said she'd admired her husband's daring. Yesterday Karen Wilcox, their oldest child, said her father ``had proven us all wrong'' for ever fretting about his sign. She said her father had worked hard all his life and that when she heard him last week on the radio, ``I had tears in my eyes. . . . I'm so proud of him.''


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-223 next last
To: Dr. Eckleburg
taught by a 26-year-old liberal who's still living at home

I would drop such a class, ethics should be taught by someone who has been around the block a few times. The one I remember was a gray beard, it was really me who was liberal and naive. I wish I could talk with him now that I am one of the old ones.

181 posted on 03/11/2003 7:44:25 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Though I don't wish evil on these smart arrogant ASSES ... I know that karma can be a bitch ...and they are VERY likely to find out.

I think that you may be focusing on one half of the reply from most critical posters. That half concerning the man's employment situation, or lack thereof. He is in the same boat as many people who were laid off recently and there really is no plus side or pro argument for his continued unemployment.

The other half of the argument concerns his personal spending habits which he is just now cutting back on. I know that things are really bad right now, but they were bad when he first lost his job. He needed to save money and yet he kept on spending beyond his means.

If he is so ready to have his story printed in the media, then he should be ready for some criticism. I am positive that most posters to this site would be happy to help the man out if he was a friend or neighbor regardless of his past decisions. On the other hand, it is not up to us to support him if he does not change his ways. He is not entitled to live a lifestyle that most of us cannot afford purely because he doesn't want to give it up..

182 posted on 03/11/2003 7:47:34 PM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
He's had two interviews and not a single job offer near the $50,000 he needs>>

Hmm--job or no job? My hubby got laid off in January. Accepted a job which would keep us having to use a little savings for a while to make a difference, but we know the oppurtunity is there to make what we really need within a couple of years. Any chance this guy could have done the same and they could have used the savings more sparingly and then he'd be back on track in a couple of years? Could his wife have picked up a job in addition to her "hobby job"? Between what she made and a 10.00 an hour job that would be more like 30K a year! My guess is he had an offer for 35k or so, so by my numbers, they would have done better if the little lady had thrown herself in the workplace for a short time!
I'm sorry, but I can't feel sorry for folks who stubbornly refuse to adjust anything in their lives. We were prepared for me to return to work for a short time if necessary and our children are not even school age yet. I hated it, but you do what you have to do--you don't just let everything you worked for for years get p*ssed away because you want only your husband to support the family or have unrealistic dreams(wife and husband) of him making the same money he did prior to this economy.
183 posted on 03/11/2003 7:48:01 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingcelt
I have no sympathy because he had TWO job offers, but they weren't making what he wanted so it sounds as though he turned them down. Also, it appears as if either he or his wife have the opinion that the wife should not think about working. Read my other post--between the two of them, they probably could do better then he wants if they would BOTH work. I also think it's incredibly imprudent for a 62 yr old man and a 56 yr old woman to have NO retirment savings or, at least partially, own a home. Perhaps it's time for those children you said sucked their resources to pay them back if that's the case.
184 posted on 03/11/2003 7:54:06 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: u-89
Did you read the part where he was offered two jobs and turned them down because they weren't enough? This guy did get a job at 62, but he turned them down. Wife does not work, save for her "hobby business". They live in a rental--2k a month-those in the area have already said they could find something comfortable but more modest for half that.--enough said--this family does not deserve the sympathy of the freepers who are giving it. I don't wish them ill will, I sure hope it comes together for them, but so far, they seem to be their own worst enemies.
185 posted on 03/11/2003 7:57:51 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: matthew_the_brain
AMEN--hubby just got a job in the insurance business and they are still hiring! They are doing well enough that they look like the brokerage he worked for back in the booming 90's. Bonuses and all that. Only thing is this dude would have to accept less pay INITIALLY! Seems like if he had done that earlier and put the old gal to work, they would not be in the straits they are in.

And for the freeper12, we have btdt--TWO times in fact in that last 18 months. Somehow we managed to put away a retirment fund, that while down signifigantly since they 90's, it is still there and generates a nice little income to help out during the lean times. Smart ass comments my butt--have you ever considered some of us have lack of compassion precisely because we have been there and done that?

Let me ask some of you this who say his age precludes him from getting a job. If it's so damn tight in the market for a 62 yr old man and these people are so desperate, then why in the hell would he turn down not one, but two jobs in his field?
186 posted on 03/11/2003 8:05:21 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: vikingcelt
BTDT, twice in 18 months--YAWN--you learn to deal with it.
187 posted on 03/11/2003 8:05:54 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Nov3
Anyone who can admire a 62 yr old man who lives well beyond his means and behaves as if he has no options when he has turned down two job offers and has a spouse who is currently not gainfully employed is, in fact, the cad!
188 posted on 03/11/2003 8:08:29 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
New ideas are not going to get going with people like the focus of this story-sorry, but that is the truth.

BTW, my over forty hubby has been laid off twice in the past 18 months--both times he found employment fairly quickly, but each time meant adjusting. This second time is much more like the first job he left and worked at for many years and should get us back to the pay he left in about a year or so--could you imagine our situation if he had not worked that year in between at a job he didn't like for a lot less salary? I dare say you'd be hearing our sob story.
189 posted on 03/11/2003 8:19:48 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Ga Rob
AMEN!!! We got ours when the bills continue to come in--you do what you have to do. How have people lost this basic principle in the interest of "preserving" their resume?
190 posted on 03/11/2003 8:20:56 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
sounds like two companies were willing to retrain him so what says you now?
191 posted on 03/11/2003 8:21:49 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Momma Lou
Hmmm...my mother who is in her 50's just started working there--she did a stellar job and they took her on full time within a couple of months. Most retail places just will not hire you full time initially. Benefits are a premium and they like people to prove they are worthy of receiving them before they dole them out.
192 posted on 03/11/2003 8:32:26 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
There's no search for replacements because there isn't much work to be done. Formerly, the US could grow out of a slump by exporting but now the entire world is in a slump.

However, the Administration will continue to plan for war.
193 posted on 03/11/2003 8:33:46 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: freeper12
Idiot! People do not choose to have cancer...people do however choose to live beyond their means and turn down good jobs in their 60's. Your moral equivalence of the two is typical of liberal think--shame on you!
194 posted on 03/11/2003 8:33:47 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Its clear that this guy's wife has sucked him dry. They'll put us all out on the street if we let them.
195 posted on 03/11/2003 8:45:10 PM PST by Archie Bunker on steroids (DNC is funding & organizing international and national antiwar movement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #196 Removed by Moderator

To: glory
>>Idiot! People do not choose to have cancer

Gee, really? People don't continue to smoke?
197 posted on 03/12/2003 5:18:35 AM PST by freeper12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
? I didn't think so-P.T. Barnum had it right all the time.

Whatever. Yeah, some are old cons. Some are not. But go ahead and make a blanket generalization. Your Barnum quote is correct after all.

198 posted on 03/12/2003 5:48:44 AM PST by banjo joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
To suggest that it doesn't matter that people outside the top twenty percent of intellect don't matter is as elitist as the Damnocrats.

I never said that. What I said was people will need to adapt, find a niche, or fall by the wayside. And to suggest that people 'outside the top 20%' are owed a job by the government is a liberal attitude, as well.

The fact of the matter is, we're looking at a societal shift here that will rival the Industrial Revolution, and will come much faster. If you had told me 5 years ago that it would be cheaper to have people in India answer our phones, I would have laughed at you. Not only was the thought ridiculous, but totally inconceivable.

Can the government help? Surely. They can limit the amount of H1B visas, limit the number of foreign students to stop the knowledge drain, etc. However, companies will always find the cheapest processes, because the consumer demands the cheapest prices. Do you have the same feelings about jobs that are lost through automation and improvement of processes? Should the government legislate against innovation?

199 posted on 03/12/2003 5:55:18 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Our kids were too considerate to demand lavish weddings at the expense of our comfort in retirement. I pity the pathetic parents of such children.

I do not remember saying they "demanded it" (because they did not) We did not touch our retirment funds to pay for it (that was the reason for the loan)

Yes it is heartless to see a man that is in trouble and mock him..I sure hope your kids have solid jobs..or you may have to eat your words..

The bible says the "measure you use to measure others is the measure used to measure you". My daddy said it clearer.."If ya spit up in the air it come down in your face" .My kids generation said " what goes around comes around. For the non Christians among us it is call Karma

Pro 14:31   He that oppresseth the poor reproacheth his Maker: but he that honoureth him hath mercy on the poor.   

  Pro 17:5   Whoso mocketh the poor reproacheth his Maker: [and] he that is glad at calamities shall not be unpunished.

200 posted on 03/12/2003 6:08:20 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson